Table of Contents | Words: Alphabetical - Frequency - Inverse - Length - Statistics | Help | IntraText Library
Alphabetical    [«  »]
objecerit 2
object 2237
objected 8
objection 324
objectionable 2
objections 161
objective 8
Frequency    [«  »]
325 deed
325 matrimony
324 80
324 objection
323 free
322 highest
321 37
St. Thomas Aquinas
Summa Theologica

IntraText - Concordances

objection

    Part, Question
1 1, 1 | divisions mentioned in the first objection. Therefore it does not seem ~ 2 1, 3 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: This objection turns upon proportionate 3 1, 4 | the Reply to the Second Objection.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[4] A[2] 4 1, 5 | solution is applied to this objection. Or it may ~be said that 5 1, 7 | appears the Reply to the First Objection.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[7] A[1] 6 1, 9 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: This objection proceeds from mutability 7 1, 10 | the answer to the Second Objection. For ~God is said to be 8 1, 12 | the answer to the Second Objection. For when it is said ~that 9 1, 13 | the solution of the First Objection, since synonymous terms ~ 10 1, 13 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: This objection refers to the imposition 11 1, 13 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: This objection would be valid if these 12 1, 14 | appears the Reply to the Third Objection. For the act of divine ~ 13 1, 14 | Para. 2/2~Now some urge an objection and say that this distinction 14 1, 14 | God cannot be known. ~This objection, however, would hold if 15 1, 14 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: This objection would avail if God knew 16 1, 18 | Wherefore the Reply to the Third Objection is clear.~Aquin.: SMT FP 17 1, 24 | the solution of the Second Objection.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[24] A[ 18 1, 24 | the Reply to the Second Objection. For there is no ~election, 19 1, 25 | Then what is ~said in the objection is false; for the sense 20 1, 27 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: This objection comes from the idea of procession 21 1, 27 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: This objection is based on the idea of 22 1, 33 | appears the Reply to the Third Objection.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[33] A[ 23 1, 39 | signification being different. ~This objection would hold good as regards 24 1, 40 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: This objection avails of paternity as a 25 1, 43 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: This objection rests on the idea of mission 26 1, 44 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: This objection has led some to say that 27 1, 45 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: This objection proceeds from a false imagination, 28 1, 46 | can be passed through. The objection is ~founded on the idea 29 1, 50 | Hence it is ~clear that the objection rests on an equivocation.~ 30 1, 53 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: This objection is based on continuous time. 31 1, 58 | 2 Para. 2/2~To the third objection the answer is the same as 32 1, 60 | The reply to the second objection follows from what has been 33 1, 61 | no one has ever raised ~objection to his teaching, as is also 34 1, 62 | The answer to the Third Objection is evident from what we 35 1, 70 | A[4]; Q[68], A[3]). The ~objection, however, falls to the ground 36 1, 39 | signification being different. ~This objection would hold good as regards 37 1, 40 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: This objection avails of paternity as a 38 1, 43 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: This objection rests on the idea of mission 39 1, 45 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: This objection has led some to say that 40 1, 46 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: This objection proceeds from a false imagination, 41 1, 47 | can be passed through. The objection is ~founded on the idea 42 1, 51 | Hence it is ~clear that the objection rests on an equivocation.~ 43 1, 54 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: This objection is based on continuous time. 44 1, 59 | 2 Para. 2/2~To the third objection the answer is the same as 45 1, 61 | The reply to the second objection follows from what has been 46 1, 62 | no one has ever raised ~objection to his teaching, as is also 47 1, 63 | The answer to the Third Objection is evident from what we 48 1, 71 | A[4]; Q[68], A[3]). The ~objection, however, falls to the ground 49 1, 78 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: This objection is verified of passion in 50 1, 81 | the answer to the third ~objection is clear. ~ 51 1, 84 | answer applies to the Second ~Objection concerning opinion and reasoning, 52 1, 84 | reasoning, and to the Third Objection, ~concerning the error of 53 1, 84 | 2~The reply to the First Objection is clear from the above; 54 1, 85 | the reply to the ~first objection is clear. ~Aquin.: SMT FP 55 1, 88 | the meaning of the second objection.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[89] A[ 56 1, 88 | retained, ~and this the objection proves; but the soul in 57 1, 88 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 4: This objection considers the corruption 58 1, 89 | observation applies to the second objection. For ~if the soul had a 59 1, 91 | how to answer the third objection.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[92] A[ 60 1, 93 | clear the reply to the first objection.~Aquin.: SMT FP Q[94] A[ 61 1, 98 | by inept matter, as the objection proposes; ~but sometimes 62 1, 99 | this the reply to the third objection is clear.~Aquin.: SMT FP 63 1, 101 | way I reply to the second objection, for those places befit ~ 64 1, 105 | inferior; which appears open to objection. Therefore the ~superior 65 1, 107 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: This objection considers principality on 66 1, 112 | The reply to the second objection appears from what has been 67 1, 113 | Thus the reply to the first objection is clear.~Aquin.: SMT FP 68 1, 113 | the answer to the first objection is clear.~Aquin.: SMT FP 69 1, 114 | the solution of the second objection. But it must be ~observed, 70 1, 115 | fate: wherefore the first ~objection's solution is manifest.~ 71 1, 118 | In like manner the third objection is ~answered. For kinship 72 2, 2 | As far as the proposed objection is concerned, happiness 73 2, 3 | this perfect happiness, the objection fails: ~because in that 74 2, 3 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: This objection proves that the operation 75 2, 5 | the reply to the first ~Objection is clear.~Aquin.: SMT FS 76 2, 6 | Nyssa, and ~Damascene [*See Objection 1], the voluntary is defined 77 2, 6 | objections. For the first ~objection deals with ignorance of 78 2, 18 | remain indifferent; and the objection proceeds along this line. ~ 79 2, 19 | Wherefore the reply to the Third Objection is evident.~Aquin.: SMT 80 2, 20 | this the reply to the Third Objection is evident.~Aquin.: SMT 81 2, 24 | Hence the reply to the First Objection is evident.~Aquin.: SMT 82 2, 26 | the Reply to the Second Objection.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[26] A[ 83 2, 27 | Hence the Reply to the First Objection is evident. ~Aquin.: SMT 84 2, 28 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: This objection takes love as a passion 85 2, 29 | how to reply to the First Objection. For the love of ~pleasure 86 2, 29 | Wherefore the reply to the First Objection is evident.~Aquin.: SMT 87 2, 29 | the Reply to the First ~Objection.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[29] A[ 88 2, 33 | 2~The Reply to the Third Objection is evident for what has 89 2, 35 | Wherefore the Reply to the Third Objection is evident. Or we may say ~ 90 2, 38 | for the reply to the Third Objection.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[38] A[ 91 2, 40 | in reply to the Second Objection, we must observe that ~young 92 2, 44 | for the Reply to the First Objection.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[44] A[ 93 2, 44 | the Reply to the Second Objection.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[44] A[ 94 2, 44 | for the Reply to the First Objection.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[44] A[ 95 2, 47 | for the Reply to the First Objection.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[47] A[ 96 2, 47 | for the Reply to the First Objection. ~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[47] A[ 97 2, 48 | the Reply to the Second Objection.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[48] A[ 98 2, 49 | how to answer the second objection: though some ~give another 99 2, 50 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: This objection runs in the sense of habit 100 2, 51 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: This objection takes nature as divided 101 2, 55 | and not at sixty. But the objection takes virtue as being ~essentially 102 2, 56 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: This objection considers virtue simply 103 2, 56 | the Reply to the Second Objection.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[56] A[ 104 2, 56 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: This objection is true of those virtues 105 2, 58 | same applies to the Third Objection.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[58] A[ 106 2, 61 | the Reply to the Second Objection is clear. For temperance ~ 107 2, 62 | for the Reply to the First Objection.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[62] A[ 108 2, 63 | rational beings. The third objection must be taken in the sense 109 2, 63 | virtues that the First Objection holds good.~Aquin.: SMT 110 2, 65 | the Reply to the Second Objection. ~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[65] A[ 111 2, 66 | for the Reply to the Third Objection.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[66] A[ 112 2, 67 | same applies to the Second Objection. For those things that concern ~ 113 2, 67 | 2~The Reply to the Third Objection is clear from what has been 114 2, 68 | things mentioned in the objection. God, ~however, to Whose 115 2, 68 | OBJ 1: Gregory solves this objection (Moral. ii, 27) by saying ~ 116 2, 70 | 2~The Reply to the Third Objection is clear from what has been 117 2, 72 | the Reply to the Second Objection.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[72] A[ 118 2, 72 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: This objection considers the material diversity 119 2, 74 | 2~The Reply to the Third Objection is evident from what has 120 2, 74 | for the Reply to the First Objection.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[74] A[ 121 2, 77 | R.O. 2 Para. 2/2~The Third Objection is solved in like manner.~ 122 2, 77 | mortal sin: whereas the objection regards the first kind.~ 123 2, 78 | of choice, to which the objection refers, neither ~excuses 124 2, 80 | Consequently the Reply to the Third Objection is clear, because these ~ 125 2, 81 | must say ~in reply to the objection, that although they are 126 2, 82 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: This objection considers the habit which 127 2, 84 | for the Reply to the First Objection.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[84] A[ 128 2, 84 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: This objection considers capital sin as 129 2, 85 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: This objection avails when diminution is 130 2, 87 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: This objection considers sin essentially 131 2, 87 | answer applies to the Third Objection.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[87] A[ 132 2, 87 | answer applies to the Third Objection about venial sin. Because ~ 133 2, 88 | must therefore reply to the objection by saying that since anger 134 2, 89 | the ~Reply to the Second Objection is evident.~Aquin.: SMT 135 2, 93 | R.O. 2 Para. 2/2~The third objection we grant, because it deals 136 2, 97 | applies also to the Third ~Objection.~Aquin.: SMT FS Q[97] A[ 137 2, 100 | 2~The Reply to the Third Objection is clear from what has been 138 2, 100 | Para. 1/2~Reply OBJ 1: This objection may be answered in two ways. 139 2, 101 | answer applies to the Fourth Objection: because men were taught ~ 140 2, 102 | 2~The Reply to the Third Objection is clear from what has been 141 2, 102 | The Reply to the Tenth Objection is lacking in the ~codices. 142 2, 109 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: This objection has to do with the natural 143 2, 109 | 1/1 ~Reply OBJ 3: This objection regards habitual grace, 144 2, 109 | Para. 1/2~Reply OBJ 1: This objection regards the first mode of 145 2, 109 | perseverance, as ~the second objection regards the second.~Aquin.: 146 2, 109 | the solution of the second objection is clear.~Aquin.: SMT FS 147 2, 110 | the Reply to the Second Objection. For grace ~is the principle 148 2, 112 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: This objection is based on the first kind 149 2, 113 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: This objection rests on the manner of acting, 150 2, 114 | perfect the action. But the objection would hold good, if we supposed 151 2, 114 | may we answer the third objection which concerns the ~increase 152 2, 1 | answer applies to the Second Objection, as regards all things ~ 153 2, 2 | the Reply to the Second Objection.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[2] A[2] 154 2, 2 | God and our ~neighbor. The objection refers to those precepts 155 2, 4 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: This objection is true of an intrinsic 156 2, 4 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: This objection considers numerical diversity 157 2, 4 | for the Reply to the First Objection.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[4] A[7] 158 2, 9 | the Reply to the Second Objection is clear.~Aquin.: SMT SS 159 2, 10 | Hence the Reply to the First Objection is clear.~Aquin.: SMT SS 160 2, 10 | for the Reply to the First Objection.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[10] A[ 161 2, 10 | for the Reply to the First Objection.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[10] A[ 162 2, 11 | heresy as stated in the first objection denotes ~a choosing. Now 163 2, 11 | as stated in the second objection, or some ~illusion of the 164 2, 12 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: This objection refers to the second kind 165 2, 16 | the ~Reply to the First Objection.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[17] A[ 166 2, 17 | for the Reply to the First Objection.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[18] A[ 167 2, 18 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: This objection considers the object of 168 2, 18 | for the Reply to the Fifth Objection.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[19] A[ 169 2, 19 | answer applies to the Third Objection, since the Novatians ~denied, 170 2, 19 | for the Reply to the First Objection.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[20] A[ 171 2, 23 | be in its subject, as the objection imagines, but by ~beginning 172 2, 23 | 2~The Reply to the Third Objection is evident from what has 173 2, 24 | Wherefore the Reply to the First Objection is evident.~Aquin.: SMT 174 2, 24 | friendship: and the Second Objection is to be taken in the same 175 2, 24 | etc. See Reply ~to this Objection.]." Therefore sinners should 176 2, 24 | passage quoted in ~the First Objection, the Reply to which is therefore 177 2, 25 | 2~The Reply to the Third Objection is evident.~Aquin.: SMT 178 2, 28 | the Reply to the Second Objection.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[29] A[ 179 2, 29 | Hence the Reply to the Third Objection is evident.~ 180 2, 30 | Wherefore the Reply to the Third Objection is evident.~Aquin.: SMT 181 2, 30 | the Reply to the Fourth Objection is clear.~Aquin.: SMT SS 182 2, 34 | the Reply to the Second Objection is ~manifest.~Aquin.: SMT 183 2, 41 | for the Reply to the First Objection.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[43] A[ 184 2, 42 | as we said in the first objection, in Dt. 6 three points are ~ 185 2, 43 | the Reply to the Second Objection is evident, ~that is if 186 2, 44 | for the Reply to the First Objection.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[46] A[ 187 2, 45 | the Reply to the Second Objection.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[47] A[ 188 2, 45 | for the Reply to the First Objection.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[47] A[ 189 2, 54 | are ~quoted in the first objection.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[56] A[ 190 2, 55 | for the Reply to the First Objection.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[57] A[ 191 2, 56 | the Reply to the Second Objection.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[58] A[ 192 2, 56 | the Reply to the Second Objection.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[58] A[ 193 2, 58 | for the Reply to the Third Objection.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[60] A[ 194 2, 60 | how to answer the First Objection: because this law ~fixes 195 2, 62 | passage ~quoted in the Second Objection is to be understood in the 196 2, 62 | the Reply to the Second ~Objection.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[64] A[ 197 2, 64 | the Reply to the First ~Objection is evident.~Aquin.: SMT 198 2, 74 | answer applies to the Second Objection.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[76] A[ 199 2, 76 | version has simply 'lend.' The objection lays ~stress on the word ' 200 2, 85 | for the Reply to the First Objection.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[87] A[ 201 2, 85 | Hence the Reply to the First Objection is clear, because the clergy 202 2, 87 | the Reply to the Second Objection.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[89] A[ 203 2, 93 | Wherefore the Reply to the First Objection is evident.~Aquin.: SMT 204 2, 93 | for the Reply to the Third Objection.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[95] A[ 205 2, 97 | stated in the ~preceding objection. Therefore it is not a special 206 2, 101 | virtue distinct from latria? Objection 1. It ~seems that dulia 207 2, 108 | as stated in ~the Second Objection. Here the first three kinds 208 2, 108 | preceding kindliness, as the objection understands the words ~to 209 2, 114 | OBJ 3: As stated in the objection, shame regards the vileness 210 2, 116 | passage quoted in the ~First Objection. Wherefore this suffices 211 2, 116 | the Reply to the First ~Objection.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[118] A[ 212 2, 116 | As stated in the Second Objection, a capital vice is one ~ 213 2, 119 | for the Reply to the First Objection.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[121] A[ 214 2, 120 | explanation quoted in the First ~Objection.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[122] A[ 215 2, 121 | in the Reply to the First Objection, is so called from its ~ 216 2, 121 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: This objection takes fortitude in the first 217 2, 121 | definition quoted ~in the Second Objection, it follows that fortitude 218 2, 121 | Objections: for the First Objection ~proceeds as though the 219 2, 134 | this point of view that the objection argues. Nor is it inconsistent 220 2, 146 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: This objection argues from the standpoint 221 2, 148 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: This objection regards the resulting defect 222 2, 151 | of the body, and thus the objection is not to the point. If, ~ 223 2, 158 | Wherefore the Reply to the Third Objection also is clear.~ 224 2, 160 | for the Reply to the First Objection.~Aquin.: SMT SS Q[162] A[ 225 2, 187 | year's ~probation, as the objection proves. The other is the 226 2, 187 | gives no reply to the third objection, which is sufficiently solved 227 3, 2 | thereby the reply to the First Objection is manifest.~Aquin.: SMT 228 3, 16 | in ~this sense that the objection takes it. But it ought to 229 3, 19 | gathered the reply to the third objection.)~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[19] A[ 230 3, 21 | Wherefore the reply to the third objection is also manifest.~Aquin.: 231 3, 22 | The reply to the third objection is wanting in the original ~ 232 3, 22 | Wherefore the reply to the third objection is clear.~Aquin.: SMT TP 233 3, 24 | And in this sense the objection takes it.~Aquin.: SMT TP 234 3, 24 | This is ~the sense of the objection. Secondly, a thing may be 235 3, 24 | to be said of the second objection.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[24] A[ 236 3, 31 | of Nazianzum answers this objection by saying that ~it happened 237 3, 31 | certain writers to this ~objection which was raised by Julian 238 3, 31 | Faustus, ~who urged this objection; "By no means," says he, " 239 3, 31 | the answer to the first objection is made manifest.~Aquin.: 240 3, 32 | reply avails for the Third Objection.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[32] A[ 241 3, 33 | the reply to the Second Objection is clear. For in the ~same 242 3, 34 | the reply to the Second Objection is clear.~Aquin.: SMT TP 243 3, 38 | baptism, in order to avoid the objection mentioned above.~Aquin.: 244 3, 53 | the answer to the first objection is clear: because both those ~ 245 3, 55 | Para. 1/1~OBJ 5: [*This objection is wanting in the older 246 3, 57 | Para. 1/1~OBJ 2: [*This objection with its solution is omitted 247 3, 57 | substance: in this sense the objection runs. Or it may be ~considered 248 3, 60 | with regard to these the objection is ~verified: only those 249 3, 63 | charity ~and grace, as the objection runs; while the latter results 250 3, 64 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: This objection is true of the power of 251 3, 72 | the ~reply to the First Objection.~Aquin.: SMT TP Q[72] A[ 252 3, 75 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: This objection holds good in respect of 253 3, 78 | for there is still the objection in regard to the first uttering 254 3, 80 | things mentioned (in the ~objection), because they do not give 255 3, 88 | stated above: and so the objection does not prove.~Aquin.: 256 3, 88 | special sin; while the ~last objection proves that ingratitude, 257 3, 90 | 2~The Reply to the Fifth Objection is clear from what has been 258 Suppl, 2 | Reply avails for the Second Objection, because contrition is ~ 259 Suppl, 2 | for the Reply to the First Objection.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[2] A[6] 260 Suppl, 3 | Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: This objection considers the sorrow which 261 Suppl, 6 | the Reply to the Second Objection, since a ~just man, who 262 Suppl, 7 | 2~The Reply to the Fifth Objection is to be gathered from what 263 Suppl, 8 | for the Reply to the First Objection, because there is no ~need 264 Suppl, 10| for the Reply to the First Objection.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[10] A[ 265 Suppl, 11| Since then by raising an objection he ~seems to raise a suspicion 266 Suppl, 11| like: so that by raising an objection one does not raise a ~suspicion 267 Suppl, 11| for the Reply to the First Objection.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[11] A[ 268 Suppl, 16| argument. But since the Fifth ~Objection proves that there will be 269 Suppl, 16| the Reply to the Second Objection.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[16] A[ 270 Suppl, 18| the Reply to the Third Objection is evident. ~Aquin.: SMT 271 Suppl, 20| Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 3: This objection considers those cases in 272 Suppl, 22| The Reply to the First Objection is evident from what has 273 Suppl, 25| Hence the Reply to the First Objection is clear.~Aquin.: SMT XP 274 Suppl, 27| for the Reply to the First Objection.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[27] A[ 275 Suppl, 27| The Reply to the Second Objection is clear from what had been 276 Suppl, 29| The Reply to the Third Objection is gathered from what has 277 Suppl, 30| Para. 1/2~Reply OBJ 1: This objection proves that bodily health 278 Suppl, 30| The Reply to the Second Objection is clear from what has been 279 Suppl, 34| in ~the superior, as the objection states; but it is not thus 280 Suppl, 34| the Reply to the First ~Objection.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[34] A[ 281 Suppl, 35| 2~The Reply to the Third Objection is the same as to the First.~ 282 Suppl, 37| for the Reply to the Fifth Objection.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[37] A[ 283 Suppl, 38| reason indicated in the Objection.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[38] A[ 284 Suppl, 40| Hence the Reply to the First Objection is clear.~Aquin.: SMT XP 285 Suppl, 43| to the ~contention of the Objection] were to happen it would 286 Suppl, 44| The Reply to the Fourth Objection is clear from what has been 287 Suppl, 46| Hence the Reply to the Third Objection is clear.~Aquin.: SMT XP 288 Suppl, 49| the unity to which the ~objection refers pertains to faith, 289 Suppl, 53| Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 2: The objection is based on a false statement: 290 Suppl, 53| for the Reply to the last Objection.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[53] A[ 291 Suppl, 54| Para. 1/1~Reply OBJ 1: This objection is based on a false premise: 292 Suppl, 54| goods of marriage. Hence the Objection proceeds from ~false premises.~ 293 Suppl, 56| to the foregoing Eighth Objection.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[56] A[ 294 Suppl, 57| the Reply to the Second Objection.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[57] A[ 295 Suppl, 62| The Reply to the ~Third Objection is clear from what has been 296 Suppl, 62| would gain his end, as the objection ~proves. Secondly, he may 297 Suppl, 62| away of the wife. Hence the objection is based on a false ~interpretation.~ 298 Suppl, 64| the Reply to the Second Objection.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[64] A[ 299 Suppl, 65| 2~The Reply to the Third Objection follows from what has been 300 Suppl, 65| 4~The Reply to the Fifth Objection is clear from what has been 301 Suppl, 65| Accordingly we reply to the Sixth Objection that human nature was ~founded 302 Suppl, 66| the Reply to the Second Objection.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[66] A[ 303 Suppl, 66| for the Reply to the First Objection.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[66] A[ 304 Suppl, 67| 2~The Reply to the Third Objection may be gathered from what 305 Suppl, 69| Hence the Reply to the Third Objection is evident: and the same 306 Suppl, 69| the Reply to the Second Objection.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[69] A[ 307 Suppl, 70| reply ~as above to the first objection.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[70] A[ 308 Suppl, 70| of his flames." ~But the objection argues as though the corporeal 309 Suppl, 72| 2~The Reply to the Third Objection is clear from what has been 310 Suppl, 72| therefore grant the First Objection.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[74] A[ 311 Suppl, 72| answer ~applies to the Second Objection.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[74] A[ 312 Suppl, 73| Hence the Reply to the First Objection is evident from what has 313 Suppl, 75| Hence the Reply to the First Objection is clear.~Aquin.: SMT XP 314 Suppl, 77| is not troubled by this ~objection, since it does not hold 315 Suppl, 80| Q[67], A[2]): hence the objection proceeds on a false ~supposition.~ 316 Suppl, 80| answer applies to the Second Objection.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[83] A[ 317 Suppl, 80| stated above. Therefore ~the objection does not prove.~Aquin.: 318 Suppl, 86| 1/1 ~Reply OBJ 1: This objection considers the judgment of 319 Suppl, 86| answer applies to the Second ~Objection.~Aquin.: SMT XP Q[89] A[ 320 Suppl, 86| answer applies to the Third Objection.~ 321 Suppl, 89| the type of all. Hence the objection proves nothing.~Aquin.: 322 Suppl, 93| death. Those to whom the objection refers are believed to have ~ 323 Suppl, 95| the ~Reply to the Second Objection, since conscience will not 324 Appen1, 2| for the Reply to the Third Objection.~Aquin.: SMT XP App. 1 Q[


Best viewed with any browser at 800x600 or 768x1024 on Tablet PC
IntraText® (V89) - Some rights reserved by Èulogos SpA - 1996-2007. Content in this page is licensed under a Creative Commons License