Council,  Canon

 1   7”,20|     of a presbyter. The Canon states definitely that a strange
 2   7”,28|       LVI of the same Council states that this was also confirmed
 3   7”,33|      sacerdotal Canon clearly states that as the crime of conspiracy
 4   7”,59|       St. Paul says. Balsamon states that such persons at various
 5   7”,60|    Nyssa in his c. II plainly states this. But also c. VII of
 6   7”,63|  asking questions, as Zonaras states, and ch. 32 of Book VIII
 7   7”,98|  excommunicated. But Balsamon states (in his interpretation of
 8   8”,23|      of thinking, as Eusebius states in his Book VI, ch. 43.~ ~  [
 9   8”,23|      bishops of Rome, Sozomen states that after God had governed
10   8”,23|  Epiphanius, in his Haer. 68, states that Alexandria never had
11   8”,23|   Eusebius ibidem, which even states that Paul used to assert
12   8”,23|     Blastaris. For the latter states that in old books it was
13   8”,23|  Council, wherein the Council states that “all bishops and clergymen
14   8”,23|    Ecrmenical C. in its edict states: “The 150 Fathers with the
15   8”,23|       as Nicephorus Callistus states, or because there arose
16   8”,23|    the Basilica, Title XXXVI, states that anyone that enters
17   8”,23|    Council held in St. Sophia states clearly that the one called
18   8”,23|   great ecclesiarch Silvester states (in Section VI, ch. 6).
19   8”,23|  Novel of Leo the Wise, which states it as follows: “It is not
20   8”,23|   laity, as the present Canon states word for word.~   ~[141]
21   8”,23|  prelate, just as Pelagius II states. This Council did not err
22   8”,23|       letter to the Trallians states that Archdeacon Stephen
23   8”,23|     shepherds). Zonaras, too, states that thev are assessors
24   8”,23|     notes by the Studite, who states that the originator of it
25   8”,23|     kalo, as a learned writer states, and especially Theodoret (
26   8”,23| concerning unleavened wafers) states that a certain Pope by the