Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 I, 2. 10. 1| genomics. These may include functional and comparative genomics
2 II, 4. 1 | surviving many years with functional restrictions and activity
3 II, 5. 2. 3| improve significantly both the functional outcome and the case fatality
4 II, 5. 5. 3| including genetic deviations and functional disturbances of the brain.
5 II, 5. 5. 3| disability due to irreversible functional disability over time (Ebers,
6 II, 5. 5. 3| MS can be measured within functional neurological systems (pyramidal,
7 II, 5. 5. 3| distribution of the scores over the functional systems combined with their
8 II, 5. 5. 3| disability in at least one functional system, 4.0-6.5 refers to
9 II, 5. 5. 3| function, regardless of functional status.~ ~Policies~ ~The
10 II, 5. 5. 3| forms of the disease and functional status of patients in Csongrád
11 II, 5. 6. 2| Musculoskeletal Conditions and Functional Limitation: the great public
12 II, 5. 6. 3| line predictors of future functional disability in patients with
13 II, 5. 6. 3| severity of RA as expressed by functional status, health status and
14 II, 5. 6. 3| risk of death, considerable functional impairment and possibly
15 II, 5. 6. 3| Only 50% report a good functional outcome at 6 months (Kaukonen
16 II, 5. 6. 4| disability~ ~In addition to functional limitations in everyday
17 II, 5. 6. 6| Musculoskeletal Problems and functional Limitation. University of
18 II, 5. 6. 6| care on the retention of functional ability. J Rheumatol 21:
19 II, 5. 6. 6| classification of global functional status in rheumatoid arthritis.
20 II, 5. 6. 6| Luthje P, Jakobsson A (1988): Functional recovery after fractures
21 II, 5. 6. 6| JE (1990): Predictors of functional recovery one year following
22 II, 5. 7. 1| diagnosed when structural or functional abnormalities of the kidneys
23 II, 5. 7. 1| Disease~ ~ ~Structural or functional abnormalities of the kidneys
24 II, 5. 14. 3| Measures of oral pain and oral functional limitation were more strongly
25 II, 5. 14. 3| oral disadvantage due to functional limitation has implications
26 II, 8. 1. 1| separates the notion of functional limitation from disability.
27 II, 8. 1. 1| limitation from disability. Functional differences are measured
28 II, 8. 2. 2| require an adequately trained, functional workforce with an enabling
29 II, 9 | an individual with lower functional capacity than would normally
30 II, 9 | self-perceived health, and a delay in functional dependence and mortality.
31 II, 9 | chronic diseases which reduce functional capacity are the result
32 II, 9 | little to change, also affect functional capacity. Poor education,
33 II, 9 | conditions all make reduced functional capacity more likely in
34 II, 9 | countries, people with poor functional ability are more likely
35 II, 9. 1. 2| with serious medical or functional consequences; some of these
36 II, 9. 3. 1| urinary incontinence. All four functional layers of the urethra –
37 II, 9. 4. 2| such sight, hearing and functional difficulties and reduced
38 II, 9. 4. 4| an individual with lower functional capacity than would normally
39 II, 9. 4. 4| self-perceived health, and a delay in functional dependence and mortality.
40 II, 9. 4. 4| chronic diseases which reduce functional capacity are the result
41 II, 9. 4. 4| little to change, also affect functional capacity. Poor education,
42 II, 9. 4. 4| conditions all make reduced functional capacity more likely in
43 II, 9. 4. 4| countries, people with poor functional ability are more likely
44 II, 9. 5. 3| conditions can negatively affect functional capacity in later life.
45 II, 9. 5. 3| noted that people with poor functional ability are more likely
46 III, 10. 2. 1| that benefits health and functional capacity without undue harm
47 III, 10. 2. 1| based upon the principle of functional labelling. Its aim is to
48 III, 10. 2. 1| claim, i.e.: nutritional, functional or health-related, made
49 III, 10. 2. 4| genetic mutations at the functional genomic unit level, and
50 III, 10. 2. 5| progressive exhaustion of functional reserves of organs and apparatuses
51 III, 10. 4. 2| confidence due to the lack of functional separation between risk
52 III, 10. 5. 1| down in more stable and functional shelters. Since this time,
53 IV, 12. 5 | Disease-specific~Perceived and functional health~Composite measures
