Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 -, 1 | Report adopts a European comparative perspective, there are considerable
2 I, 2. 5 | Work on the methodology for comparative analysis and the exchange
3 I, 2. 10. 1| may include functional and comparative genomics and/or in silico
4 II, 5. 3. 2| cancer care by providing comparative data about treatment patterns
5 II, 5. 4. 6| Health targeted the need for comparative information on the following
6 II, 5. 5. 3| there are little accurate comparative data on prescribing patterns
7 II, 5. 5. 3| daily doses or DDD, and a comparative standard is emerging based
8 II, 5. 5. 3| not so great as to prevent comparative analysis and do not explain
9 II, 5. 5. 3| changes do not prevent some comparative analysis and do not fully
10 II, 5. 5. 3| cannot be estimated, as comparative estimates of the rate of
11 II, 5. 5. 3| of multiple sclerosis: a comparative study of four centres in
12 II, 5. 5. 3| industry-sponsored studies, and a comparative analysis of burden-of-disease,
13 II, 5. 6. 6| disorders in the community: the comparative prevalence of symptoms at
14 II, 5. 7. 3| compared to Norway. In a recent comparative study (Hallan et al, 2006a)
15 II, 5. 11. 3| gold sodium thiosulfate. A comparative study, Contact Dermatitis,
16 II, 5. 11. 6| complete absence of any comparative prevalence surveys of skin
17 II, 9. 1. 1| information, there are no comparative data available on the principal
18 II, 9. 1. 1| Pharoah P, Sturgiss SN (2000): Comparative trends in cause-specific
19 II, 9. 1. 2| of prescription drugs and comparative risk assessment. Elsevier
20 II, 9. 2. 6| the enhanced collection of comparative data on children, including
21 II, 9. 3. 2| Pharoah P, Sturgiss SN (2000): Comparative trends in cause-specific
22 II, 9. 3. 3| many different groups.~· Comparative data on health of adolescents
23 II, 9. 3. 3| for the systematic use of comparative indicators for sexual behaviour
24 II, 9. 3. 3| general health surveys using comparative sexual health indicators
25 II, 9. 3. 3| behaviour in HIV epidemiology: Comparative analysis in France and Britain.
26 III, 10. 2. 1| and medicine~ECAS~European Comparative Alcohol Study~ELSA~Enforcement
27 III, 10. 2. 1| Commission-funded projects~ ~· European Comparative Alcohol Study (ECAS) reports (
28 III, 10. 2. 1| Health Organization (WHO)~ ~· Comparative Risk Assessment Study, carried
29 III, 10. 2. 1| Database~ ~International comparative surveys~ ~· European Schools
30 III, 10. 2. 1| their ability to provide comparative dietary intake information
31 III, 10. 2. 1| high body mass index). In Comparative quantification of health
32 III, 10. 2. 5| and it provides the only comparative European data on early mother-child
33 III, 10. 5. 1| are very few international comparative studies on the school environment
34 III, 10. 5. 1| of the world. One small comparative EU-funded study in west-Europe
35 III, 10. 6. 1| burden of crime in the EU. A comparative analysis of the European
36 III, 10. 6. 3| by means of survey-based comparative measurement of a large sample
37 III, 10. 6. 3| addresses new needs for European comparative data for policy-makers.
38 III, 10. 6. 3| policy-makers. EUICS published a comparative analysis of crime and safety
39 IV, 11. 1. 1| chapter adopts a European comparative perspective, there are considerable
40 IV, 11. 1. 1| context based on well-informed comparative research. The challenge
41 IV, 11. 1. 2| for the majority of the comparative figures on health expenditure,
42 IV, 11. 1. 2| across countries and the comparative figures should be interpreted
43 IV, 11. 1. 2| important cross-country comparative projects in areas such as
44 IV, 11. 1. 3| useful starting point for a comparative analysis, although as shown
45 IV, 11. 1. 5| medical practice, provide comparative performance data and encourage
46 IV, 11. 1. 5| surveys and opinion polls. Comparative data across countries tend
47 IV, 11. 6. 5| Aim of Social Policy: a Comparative Analysis of Taxes, Tax Expenditure
48 IV, 11. 6. 5| 2005): "Methods for the comparative evaluation of pharmaceuticals."
49 IV, 12. 4 | social policy on the basis of comparative information, research and
50 IV, 12. 10 | associations~Foundation for comparative product testing (Stiftung
51 IV, 13. 6. 2| as this; thus, meaningful comparative analyses of issues such
