Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 I, 2. 10. 5| for the assessment, the conclusions reached and how the HTA
2 II, 5. 2. 5| health in the Health Council conclusions~· The European Union Council
3 II, 5. 2. 5| The European Union Council Conclusions, adopted under the Irish
4 II, 5. 2. 5| policies expressed by the conclusions of the European Council
5 II, 5. 2. 6| practice, leading to wrong conclusions and decisions if not properly
6 II, 5. 4. 2| regions~· epidemiological conclusions can be drawn on the basis
7 II, 5. 4. 6| recommendations, by releasing the Conclusions on the promotion of healthy
8 II, 5. 4. 7| commitments, declarations and conclusions into tangible political
9 II, 5. 4. 8| European Union (2006), Council Conclusions on promotion of healthy
10 II, 5. 5.Int| mental health. The Council Conclusions adopted in June 2005 reinforced
11 II, 5. 5. 3| group of persons, but forbid conclusions on population level. Several
12 II, 5. 5. 3| not allow representative conclusions about prevalence and incidence. ~ ~
13 II, 5. 5. 3| of 5 or 10 years allowing conclusions about changes in incidence,
14 II, 5. 5. 3| promising - do not allow final conclusions on the preventive effects
15 II, 5. 14. 2| The interpretation and conclusions in public oral health are
16 II, 6. 2 | data on which to build such conclusions are far from perfect, and
17 II, 6. 3. 6| all cases, and very few conclusions can be drawn from the data.~ ~
18 II, 7. 1 | Safety Promotion based on the conclusions of a Communication from
19 II, 9. 1. 1| for more information.~ ~ ~Conclusions and future priorities for
20 II, 9. 2. 7| European Union (2006): Council Conclusions on Health in All Policies (
21 II, 9. 3. 1| clinician cannot draw any conclusions about the timing of an individual
22 II, 9. 5. 5| developments are:~· the Council Conclusions of 16.12.2005 on the implementation
23 II, 9. 5. 5| Action; and~· the Council Conclusions of 2.6.2006 on gender equality
24 III, 10. 2. 1| adopted in February 2008. The conclusions of this report and the final
25 III, 10. 2. 1| ingestion from toothpaste: conclusions of European Union-funded
26 III, 10. 2. 1| will be conditional on the conclusions of an assessment demonstrating
27 III, 10. 2. 1| WHO/FAO expert report. Its conclusions and the scheme to develop
28 III, 10. 2. 4| to be reluctant to draw conclusions from the existing evidence.~ ~
29 III, 10. 2. 4| to be reluctant to draw conclusions from the existing evidence.
30 III, 10. 3. 1| data are sparse and any conclusions therefore are uncertain.
31 III, 10. 3. 2| endocrine disruptors no clear conclusions can be drawn regarding their
32 III, 10. 3. 4| catchments draw consistent conclusions. Estimated total damages
33 III, 10. 4. 2| EFSA, 2006a).~ ~The main conclusions on the Community Summary
34 III, 10. 4. 2| 2008 include:~· delivering conclusions on 37 active substances
35 III, 10. 4. 2| publication;~· delivering conclusions on 11 active substances
36 III, 10. 4. 2| months.~ ~The findings and conclusions of the inspections are presented
37 III, 10. 6. 3| type of contact crime. Firm conclusions about relative vulnerability
38 IV, 11. 1. 3| to be cautious in drawing conclusions from measures of health
39 IV, 11. 1. 5| is difficult to glean any conclusions based on this survey data
40 IV, 11. 4 | seemingly is leading to varying conclusions and subsequent recommendations,
41 IV, 12. 2 | health in the Health Council conclusions.~ ~The European Union Council
42 IV, 12. 2 | The European Union Council Conclusions, adopted under the Irish
43 IV, 12. 2 | policies expressed by the conclusions of the European Council
44 IV, 12. 7 | health theme. The council conclusions in that effect were made
45 IV, 12. 7 | fundamental principles. Moreover, conclusions on “Health in All Policies”
46 IV, 13.Acr | produced - mainly as Council Conclusions or Recommendations - strategic
47 IV, 13. 1 | deal with them. Similar conclusions are also reached by comparing
48 IV, 13. 7. 1| cross-national collaboration.~In its conclusions of 4 December 2006, the
