Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 II, 4. 1 | for men and women. If we consider a gain of 5% between 1995
2 II, 5. 2. 2| would also be reasonable to consider Malta as an outlier in the
3 II, 5. 2. 6| actors, for Member States to consider in their own national policies
4 II, 5. 2. 6| international organizations to consider at regional and global levels.
5 II, 5. 3. 2| is relatively low if we consider that registration is essential
6 II, 5. 3. 2| Working Party Leaders to consider CRs as important as National
7 II, 5. 3. 6| Moreover, it is important to consider that the prevalence of European
8 II, 5. 3. 7| States (see Table 5.3.2) consider national cancer plan as
9 II, 5. 5. 2| European policy makers to consider these recommendations and
10 II, 5. 6. 1| mechanisms. This chapter will consider musculoskeletal problems
11 II, 5. 8. 3| these basis, some authors consider that COPD should no longer
12 II, 6. 3. 4| vaccination of children could consider switching to vaccination
13 II, 8. 2. 1| parents and allow them to consider the option of termination
14 II, 9 | 2004). Member States should consider the promotion of programmes
15 II, 9. 1. 1| mortality and points to consider when comparing rates between
16 II, 9. 1. 1| Indicator~Definition~Points to consider in interpretation~Fetal
17 II, 9. 1. 2| number of women having to consider termination of pregnancy
18 II, 9. 2. 3| quarter of 11-year-old girls consider themselves to be too fat,
19 II, 9. 4. 4| 2004). Member States should consider the promotion of programmes
20 II, 9. 4. 5| concerned, it is important to consider that, partly due to the
21 II, 9. 5. 1| health, it is essential to consider a lifespan and multiple
22 III, 10. 1. 1| intervention studies only consider the energy intake immediately
23 III, 10. 2. 1| awareness of the need to consider the public health implications
24 III, 10. 2. 1| fluoridation programmes, to consider the development and implementation
25 III, 10. 2. 1| nutrition recommendations consider public health significance.
26 III, 10. 3. 1| mitigation measures have to consider differences in exposure
27 III, 10. 3. 1| European countries do not consider in their legislation different
28 III, 10. 4. 2| decision makers need to consider a range of information in
29 III, 10. 4. 2| foodstuffs has to properly consider microbiological criteria,
30 III, 10. 4. 2| the EU, it is important to consider the food chain globally,
31 III, 10. 4. 5| gained only from studies that consider exposure pathways and biomarkers
32 III, 10. 4. 5| site investigations should consider metals, polycyclic aromatic
33 III, 10. 4. 5| gained only from studies that consider exposure pathways and biomarkers
34 III, 10. 5. 2| al., 1997), and needs to consider that in poorer countries
35 III, 10. 5. 2| morbidity differences implies to consider the demographic differences
36 III, 10. 5. 3| of the female respondents consider their health or safety at
37 III, 10. 5. 3| does and almost two-thirds consider that their job does not
38 IV, 11. 1. 3| is clearly important to consider when evaluating a country’
39 IV, 11. 1. 4| therefore, important to consider not just health system efficiency,
40 IV, 11. 1. 4| particular because it does not consider the capacity of an individual
41 IV, 11. 2. 1| It is also important to consider the number of hospital beds
42 IV, 11. 5. 4| additional option is to consider other potential donors~(“
43 IV, 12. 5 | for men and women. If we consider a gain of 5% between 1995
44 IV, 12. 10 | ageing will be prepared to consider how the challenge can best
45 IV, 12. 10 | public health, are obliged to consider the effects and to monitor
46 IV, 13. 2. 3| choices, although one has to consider the important interaction
