Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1   II,     5.  1.  1|            into cervical cancer.~ ~Prostate cancer: age is the strongest
 2   II,     5.  1.  1|          strongest risk factor for prostate cancer: development of this
 3   II,     5.  3.  1| implication in screening activity; prostate and stomach cancers for
 4   II,     5.  3.  3|           cervix (ICD-9 code 180), prostate cancers (ICD-9 code 185),
 5   II,     5.  3.  4|            into cervical cancer.~ ~Prostate cancer: age is the strongest
 6   II,     5.  3.  4|          strongest risk factor for prostate cancer: development of this
 7   II,     5.  3.  5|           in the age class 20-44~ ~Prostate Cancer (ICD-9 185)~In 2006,
 8   II,     5.  3.  5|          deaths were estimated for prostate cancer in Europe (Ferlay
 9   II,     5.  3.  5|           al, 2007). Comparison of prostate cancer rates in European
10   II,     5.  3.  5|             incidence) of positive prostate cancers prognosis.~Prostate
11   II,     5.  3.  5|        prostate cancers prognosis.~Prostate cancer incidence seems to
12   II,     5.  3.  5|           Europe.~ ~Figure 5.3.25. Prostate cancer (ICD9 185) standardized
13   II,     5.  3.  5|           Figure 5.3.26. Trends of prostate cancer (ICD9 185) standardized
14   II,     5.  3.  5|           standard)~Figure 5.3.27. Prostate cancer (ICD9 185) standardized
15   II,     5.  3.  5|           Figure 5.3.28. Trends of prostate cancer (ICD9 185) standardized
16   II,     5.  3.  6|     European relative survival for prostate cancer 5 years after diagnosis
17   II,     5.  3.  6|        relative survival rates for prostate cancer differed greatly
18   II,     5.  3.  6|         year relative survival for prostate cancer were seen in Estonia (
19   II,     5.  3.  6|            2003).~ ~Figure 5.3.35. Prostate cancer (ICD9 185) age-standardized
20   II,     5.  3.  6|       breast (European mean: 79%), prostate (European mean: 76%) cancer
21   II,     5.  3.  6|           with colorectal, breast, prostate cancers. The European mean
22   II,     5.  3.  6|            cancer from 60% to 74%; prostate cancer from 40% to 68%).~
23   II,     5.  3.  7|    establish whether screening for prostate cancer or lung cancer in
24   II,     5.  3.  7|           for implementing lung or prostate cancer screening.~ ~
25   II,     9.  3.  1|         instance, the incidence of prostate cancer is increasing due
26   II,     9.  3.  1|           the breast, endometrium, prostate, testis, bowel, liver, kidney,
27   II,     9.  3.  1|            2004); the treatment of prostate cancer, which for many men
28   II,     9.  3.  1|           are mainly due to either prostate problems or the side effects
29   II,     9.  3.  1|        side effects of surgery for prostate problems.~ ~Brain function,
30   II,     9.  3.  1|         ultrasounds, respectively. Prostate status should be assessed
31   II,     9.  3.  1|        Lilja H, Hugosson J (2007): Prostate Cancer Screening Decreases
32   II,     9.  3.  1|            Diagnosed with Advanced Prostate CancerResults from a Prospective,
33   II,     9.  3.  1|         accessed 02.07)~ ~European Prostate Cancer Coalition: htt 1 (
34   II,     9.  3.  1|      hormone agonist treatment for prostate carcinoma. Cancer 104(8):
35   II,     9.  4.  3|        deaths after the age of 65. Prostate cancer is the most common
36   II,     9.  4.  3|           Senkus-Konefka, 2004).~ ~Prostate Cancer. Deprivation incidence
37   II,     9.  5.  4|           from their evaluation of prostate cancer and colorectal screening
38  III,    10.  2.  5|          women and testicular- and prostate cancer in men. Testicular
39  III,    10.  3.  2|          women and testicular- and prostate cancer in men. Testicular
40  III,    10.  5.  2|       survival after diagnosis for prostate and lung cancer, and that,
41   IV,    13.  2.  3|          atmosphere~Schizophrenia, prostate cancer, influenza~3,000 –
42  Key,   Ap5.  0.  0|           production~professionals~prostate~proteinuria~providers~pseudomonas~