Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1   II,     5.  2.  5|      highlights the importance of decisions such as stop smoking, adopting
 2   II,     5.  2.  6|          to wrong conclusions and decisions if not properly controlled
 3   II,     5.  3.  7|         required to make the best decisions for each patient’s diagnosis,
 4   II,     5.  5.  2|       they need assistance making decisions. At this time, a legal guardian
 5   II,     5.  5.  3|           create a firm basis for decisions and strategies regarding
 6   II,     5.  5.  3|     Database~Since strategies and decisions should be backed up by reliable
 7   II,     5.  7.  6|     stakeholders in guiding their decisions. The NephroQUEST project
 8   II,     6.  3.  2|      involves important political decisions, specific legislation and
 9   II,     6.  4.  2|           the system. Under these decisions, Member States should inform
10   II,     9.  1.  2|          termination necessitates decisions on which anomalies justify
11   II,     9.  1.  2|     European information systemdecisions on funding are short-term.
12   II,     9.  2.  1|        health-related behavioural decisions), they nevertheless remain
13   II,     9.  2.  1|       blame them for making wrong decisions, many commercial interests
14   II,     9.  2.  5|      thirty directives, framework decisions or green papers have been
15   II,     9.  4.  5|         considerations into their decisions. A process of mutual learning
16  III,    10.  2.  1|       which include authoritative decisions that are made by governments
17  III,    10.  3.  1|        findings and more informed decisions. Protecting human health
18  III,    10.  4.  2|        open to risk managers when decisions have to be made to protect
19  III,    10.  4.  2|  assessment process. This affects decisions on:~ ~· The choice of qualitative
20  III,    10.  5.  1|        health and that the policy decisions can have a positive or a
21  III,    10.  6.  2|           and by taking political decisions at different levels. The
22   IV,    11.  1.  6| reimbursement rates also requires decisions to be made about outlier
23   IV,    11.  2.  2|   systematic procedure for making decisions affecting public health,
24   IV,    11.  2.  2|       methodology used for making decisions and setting priorities in
25   IV,    11.  2.  2|        evidence to support policy decisions and evaluate the effectiveness
26   IV,    11.  3.  2|          wide range of regulatory decisions about market authorization,
27   IV,    11.  3.  2|           linked to reimbursement decisions by setting a maximum level
28   IV,    11.  3.  2|            2006).~ ~Reimbursement decisions about whether and at what
29   IV,    11.  3.  2|         and the payer, and policy decisions regarding cost-sharing arrangements.
30   IV,    11.  3.  2|        used to make reimbursement decisions, e.g. in Finland and the
31   IV,    11.  3.  2|        analysis is used to inform decisions about reimbursement, but
32   IV,    11.  4    |          define policies nor make decisions. There is a clear distinction
33   IV,    11.  4    |          committees to inform its decisions, and are made publicly available
34   IV,    11.  4    |           reached its preliminary decisions. The assessment does not
35   IV,    11.  6.  2|         electorate and allocation decisions may be more apparent; and
36   IV,    11.  6.  4|           so for pharmaceuticals. Decisions regarding benefit catalogues
37   IV,    11.  6.  4|       reports, to support various decisions surrounding a given health
38   IV,    11.  6.  4|         reimbursement and pricing decisions often differ from those
39   IV,    11.  6.  4|     political will to enforce the decisions based on HTA. The trend
40   IV,    11.  6.  5|     Shifting criteria for benefit decisions in social health insurance
41   IV,    11.  6.  5|       into Health Care Purchasing Decisions? New York, The Commonwealth
42   IV,    11.  6.  5|   resource allocation and funding decisions. Funding health care: options
43   IV,    12.  1    |          of integrated regulatory decisions about good clinical practice
44   IV,    12.  2    |       which include authoritative decisions that are made by governments
45   IV,    12.  4    |      charge of all health related decisions. Similarly, the work of
46   IV,    12.  7    |       health can be influenced by decisions made in sectors other than
47   IV,    12.  7    |         the health impact of such decisions, so that health is systematically
48   IV,    12. 10    |       implement the Strategy. The decisions of the HSE in relation to
49   IV,    12. 10    |             According Ministerial Decisions 76017 (1-8-2002) and 82942 (
50   IV,    12. 10    |          organisms.~o Ministerial Decisions 34258 and 100 (published
51   IV,    12. 10    |         etc.)~Air pollution~ High~Decisions 346-352/03/2007 regarding
52   IV,    12. 10    |  pesticides~ high~Law 89/2006 and decisions on maximum admitted levels
53   IV,    12. 10    |           municipalities had made decisions on municipal merges, reducing
54   IV,    13.Acr    |       methodology used for making decisions and setting priorities in
55   IV,    13.  3    |        define priorities, support decisions and evaluate cost-effectiveness