Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1   II,     5.  3.  5|          Prostate-Specific Antigen) testing, which resulted in increased
 2   II,     5.  4.  2|          diabetes care~Annual HbA1c testing~Annual LDL cholesterol testing~
 3   II,     5.  4.  2|      testing~Annual LDL cholesterol testing~Annual screening for nephropathy~
 4   II,     5.  4.  3|        existing recommendations for testing.~LDL cholesterol level >
 5   II,     5.  4.  6|           of oral glucose tolerance testing for the diagnosis of this
 6   II,     5.  4.  8|       Should oral glucose tolerance testing be mandatory following acute
 7   II,     5.  7.  1|      currently underway for further testing the value of these biomarkers
 8   II,     5.  9.  4|            EXPAH project (htt f) is testing the hypothesis that PAHs
 9   II,     5. 11.  3|            ESSCA): results of patch testing the standard series, 2004.
10   II,     5. 11.  3|     investigation by means of patch testing, a process whereby a standard
11   II,     6.  3.  2|         methodology for sensitivity testing is the same in all laboratories
12   II,     6.  3.  3|            must be made to increase testing uptake; thus, ECDC has started
13   II,     8.  1.  4|             screened with cognitive testing. A first discussion with
14   II,     8.  1.  4|            A larger translation and testing is also planned.~On the
15   II,     8.  1.  4|         basis of the results of the testing phase, a decision will then
16   II,     8.  2.  1|       Doctors may recommend genetic testing for people who have a family
17   II,     8.  2.  2|             refractive services for testing; insufficient provision
18   II,     9.  3.  1|             recommended for further testing and treatment (Arber, 2006).~ ~
19   II,     9.  3.  2|    EURO-PERISTAT group is currently testing the feasibility and quality
20   II,     9.  3.  3|            revised, but reliability testing was not undertaken in European
21  III,    10.  2.  1|             intensive random breath testing, where police regularly
22  III,    10.  2.  4|            harmonisation of genetic testing services in the EU” (Ibarreta
23  III,    10.  2.  4|            harmonisation of genetic testing services in the EU, www ~ ~
24  III,    10.  2.  5|            an absence of systematic testing, many additional chemicals
25  III,    10.  2.  5|        origin are the great gaps in testing chemicals for developmental
26  III,    10.  3.  2|    emergency plans (elaboration and testing) and provision of information
27  III,    10.  3.  2|            an absence of systematic testing, many additional chemicals
28  III,    10.  3.  2|        origin are the great gaps in testing chemicals for developmental
29  III,    10.  4.  2|          across the EU to harmonise testing methodology for contaminants.
30  III,    10.  4.  2|     Commission but the frequency of testing varies across Member States.
31  III,    10.  4.  2|     microorganisms, microbiological testing of finished food products
32  III,    10.  4.  2|     supplements, is currently under testing within the framework of
33  III,    10.  4.  2|        without any need for further testing. Issues that should be carefully
34  III,    10.  4.  2|            purposes (e.g. for field testing), is governed by Directive
35  III,    10.  4.  2| verifications, audits, sampling and testing of samples. Training of
36  III,    10.  4.  2|             laboratory capacity for testing and a sufficient number
37   IV,    11.  5.  3|             of authorised tests for testing the donors is a binding
38   IV,    12.  2    |             intensive random breath testing, where police regularly
39   IV,    12. 10    |             for comparative product testing (Stiftung Warentest, see www. –
40   IV,    12. 10    |       voluntary counselling and HIV testing services (initiated by Global