Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 IV, 11. 1. 6| fee-for-service, salary and capitation. There are many variations
2 IV, 11. 1. 6| prospective (includes salary, capitation and line-item or global
3 IV, 11. 1. 6| taxation in a public system.~ ~Capitation is the payment of a set
4 IV, 11. 1. 6| schedule, while salary and capitation methods control costs but
5 IV, 11. 1. 6| GPs changing from a full capitation model to a partial fee-for-service/
6 IV, 11. 1. 6| fee-for-service/partial capitation method found that: a) activity
7 IV, 11. 1. 6| through a combination of capitation and fee-for-service. Specialists
8 IV, 11. 1. 6| by fee-for-service and capitation.~90% by fee-for-service,
9 IV, 11. 1. 6| fee-for-service, 10% by capitation and fee-for-service.~90%
10 IV, 11. 1. 6| Fee-for-service.~Bulgaria~Capitation (with some fee-for-service
11 IV, 11. 1. 6| personnel groups.~Croatia~Capitation (with fee-for-service for
12 IV, 11. 1. 6| not exceeding 7% of annual capitation).~Fee-for-service~Fee-for-service~
13 IV, 11. 1. 6| Fee-for-service.~Czech Republic~Capitation and fee-for-service~Fee-for-service (
14 IV, 11. 1. 6| fee-for-service, 28% from capitation).~Not relevant.~Salary.~ ~
15 IV, 11. 1. 6| 86% by blended payment (capitation, practice allowance, fee-for-service
16 IV, 11. 1. 6| fee-for-service.~Estonia~Capitation, fee-for-service (to a maximum
17 IV, 11. 1. 6| to a maximum of 18% of capitation payment), monthly allowance,
18 IV, 11. 1. 6| fee-for-service and salary).~Hungary~Capitation plus fixed amount based
19 IV, 11. 1. 6| Fee-for-service~Salary~ ~Italy~Capitation (ranging according to years
20 IV, 11. 1. 6| if higher income, patient capitation if lower patient income.~ ~
21 IV, 11. 1. 6| hospital.~ ~Latvia~“Mixed capitation”~Fee-for-service~Salary~
22 IV, 11. 1. 6| Fee-for-service~Lithuania~Capitation and fee-for-service.~Salary
23 IV, 11. 1. 6| if higher patient income,~capitation if lower patient income.~ ~ ~
24 IV, 11. 1. 6| fee-for-service and 30% from capitation).~Salary and fee-for-service
25 IV, 11. 1. 6| sector.~ ~Salary.~ ~ ~Poland~Capitation.~ ~ ~Fee-for-service.~Portugal~
26 IV, 11. 1. 6| Romania~Blended payment: capitation (85%) and fee-for-service (
27 IV, 11. 1. 6| Republic~Blended payment (capitation and target~payments for
28 IV, 11. 1. 6| from salary~and 15% from capitation).~100% by salary.~ ~100%
29 IV, 11. 1. 6| fee-for-service) and prospective (i.e. capitation, salaries) payment methods
30 IV, 11. 1. 6| combined with risk-adjusted capitation (Smith, 2004).~ ~The development,
31 IV, 11. 6. 2| allocation based on risk-adjusted capitation is another widespread trend
32 IV, 11. 6. 4| budgets of the purchasers is capitation (i.e. the amount is determined
33 IV, 11. 6. 4| allocation based on risk adjusted capitation aims at re-allocating resources
34 IV, 11. 6. 4| England (where risk adjusted capitation has been used since the
35 IV, 11. 6. 4| Allocation agent~Purchaser~Capitation – factors included~Austria~
36 IV, 11. 6. 4| pooling across funds. No capitation.~Belgium~National Social
37 IV, 11. 6. 4| funds (employment based)~No capitation. Allocation based on historical
38 IV, 11. 6. 4| Health~8 health boards~No capitation. Services funded based on
39 IV, 11. 6. 4| funds (employment based)~No capitation. Full risk pooling~Malta~
40 IV, 11. 6. 5| 2006): Cochrane Review: Capitation, salary, fee-for-service
