Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1    -,     1            |  possible, the extent of their success or failure.~ ~So far, two
 2    I,     2. 10.  4(12)|     Robertson Ref. “Coding for successSimple technology for
 3    I,     2. 10.  4(19)|                     Coding for successSimple technology for
 4    I,     2. 10.  4(22)|                     Coding for successSimple technology for
 5   II,     5.  9.  5    |        change are all critical success factors for the implementation
 6   II,     5. 15.  5    |     highest possible chance of success through the sharing of expertise
 7   II,     6.  3.  2    |   Europe of good practices and success stories.~ ~
 8   II,     6.  3.  7    |        applied with increasing success. Still, the risk for travellers
 9   II,     7.  1        |      policies and evaluate the success of interventions designed
10   II,     7.  6        |      and emergency care). This success is owed to the fact that
11   II,     9.  1.  2    |       have not seen increasing success in congenital anomaly prevention,
12   II,     9.  2.  3    |       the same time, given the success in virtually eradicating
13   II,     9.  3.  1    |       and treatment has a high success rate. Ministers in England
14   II,     9.  3.  2    |      variations in the use and success of these medical technologies
15  III,    10.  2.  1    |       of 1% of region's GDP.~ ~Success of interventions geared
16  III,    10.  2.  1    |       power alone (ASH, 2006). Success depends to a great extent
17  III,    10.  2.  1    |    quit smoking determines the success rate of smoking cessation
18  III,    10.  2.  1    | nicotine addiction show modest success and are either based on
19  III,    10.  2.  1    |    period is attributed to the success of the 2003 EU directive
20  III,    10.  5.  1    |     Council, 2006). Still, the success of these strategies is restricted
21   IV,    11.  1.  3    |        with varying degrees of success and ease among the countries,
22   IV,    11.  1.  3    |       Germany).~ ~Despite some success in putting downward pressure
23   IV,    11.  1.  6    |       Federation, 2006).~ ~The success of a DRG system depends
24   IV,    11.  5.  1    | Donation and Transplantation~ ~Success of transplantation indeed
25   IV,    11.  5.  5    |     CSE and solid organ.~ ~The success depends on the mobilisation
26   IV,    11.  6.  1    |    1990s, this may not reflect success in controlling growth in
27   IV,    12.  2        |        using will power alone. Success depends to a great extent
28   IV,    12.  2        |    quit smoking determines the success rate of smoking cessation
29   IV,    12.  3        |      boost implementation:~The success of the open method of coordination
30   IV,    12.  7        |        before really declaring success.~ ~Annex 12.2. Declaration
31   IV,    12. 10        |       plan in 2006 (htt ). The success of the Convention thus heavily
32   IV,    13.  5        |        aggregate mark of human success in improving living conditions
33   IV,    13.  7.  2    |    technologies and the market success of innovations. The gains