Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1    I,     2.  2    |         manufacturers, an easing of restrictions on foreign direct investments
 2    I,     2.  5    |         manufacturers, an easing of restrictions on foreign direct investment
 3    I,     2. 10.  4|             any country without any restrictions or errors.~ ~Local needs
 4   II,     4.  1    |          many years with functional restrictions and activity limitations (
 5   II,     5.  5.  3|             abilities often lead to restrictions or even incapability to
 6   II,     5.  5.  3|             and the unnecessary job restrictions adopted in patients with
 7   II,     5.  5.  3|            Fraser et al, 1983). Job restrictions are common in European countries,
 8   II,     5.  5.  3|     epilepsy and considers that job restrictions are discriminatory unless
 9   II,     5. 10.  1|          sometimes harmful, dietary restrictions, particularly in children (
10   II,     5. 10.  4|         lead to unnecessary dietary restrictions, which are of particular
11   II,     7.  6    |       situation may change but some restrictions must be considered:~ ~The
12   II,     8.  1.  2|          these questions relates to restrictions regarding activities in
13   II,     8.  1.  3|            third reported to suffer restrictions in the mobility to and from
14   II,     8.  1.  3|         same individual, altogether restrictions related to work are experienced
15   II,     8.  1.  3|          LSHPD)~ ~The occurrence of restrictions in work ability due to LSHPD
16   II,     8.  1.  3|            people with considerable restrictions related to work, 42% indicated
17   II,     8.  1.  3|              almost 60% reported no restrictions in work activities. Considerable
18   II,     8.  1.  3|            activities. Considerable restrictions with regard to work were
19   II,     8.  1.  3|           persons with considerable restrictions in the ability to work and
20   II,     8.  1.  3|           persons with considerable restrictions and 36% for those limited
21   II,     8.  1.  3|            to 43% for those with no restrictions. These differences are also
22   II,     8.  1.  3|          with 45% in people with no restrictions; in the age group 55-64
23   II,     9.  4.  5|           norms of widowhood impose restrictions that have negative effects
24  III,    10.  2.  1|            delivery~- Foetal growth restrictions and low birth weight~- Increased
25  III,    10.  2.  1| anti-smoking interventions, such as restrictions of smoking in the workplace
26  III,    10.  2.  1|       countries are required to put restrictions in place; and~· demand reduction
27  III,    10.  4.  2|         involving~private sources~ ~Restrictions on the~consumption of nitrate-~
28  III,    10.  4.  2|    regulations prohibiting quantity restrictions on the import of food or
29  III,    10.  5.  3|         manufacturers, an easing of restrictions on foreign direct investment
30   IV,    12.  2    |       countries are required to put restrictions in place; and~demand reduction
31   IV,    12. 10    |      tobacco snuff use~ high~Law on Restrictions regarding Sale, Advertising
32   IV,    12. 10    |          specific food products and restrictions~Special targetHealthier
33   IV,    12. 10    |          specific food products and restrictions~FrameworkHealthy Diet,