Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 II, 5. 1. 2| latter being much easier to define and which responds to the
2 II, 5. 1. 2| shows how difficult it is to define care since its efficiency
3 II, 5. 3. 7| most European countries define, mainly at national level
4 II, 5. 4. 2| contributing significantly to define estimates of rates of complications
5 II, 5. 5. 3| and the criteria used to define autism have changed over
6 II, 5. 5. 3| classification criteria used to define autism have changed over
7 II, 5. 5. 3| comorbidity” is used here to define the contemporary occurrence
8 II, 6. 3. 3| epidemiological studies would help to define the profile of HPV strains
9 II, 9. 2. 6| addition, it is necessary to define “intentional harm” and provide
10 III, 10. 2. 1| respectively; pre-obese is used to define adults with a BMI of 25.
11 III, 10. 2. 1| Group, 2002) were:~· to define a method for monitoring
12 III, 10. 2. 1| data comparable; and~· to define a (minimum) set of dietary
13 III, 10. 4. 2| achievements has been to define food, which has enabled
14 III, 10. 4. 2| sparse. There is a need to define the optimal monitoring schemes
15 III, 10. 4. 3| open for Member States to define additional limit values
16 III, 10. 5. 2| cases it seems easier to define “urbanism” and then label
17 III, 10. 5. 2| rural residents more often define their health status as poor.
18 IV, 11. 1. 5| even consensus, on how to define quality of care, is largely
19 IV, 11. 1. 6| are being introduced to define the budgets or as a form
20 IV, 11. 4 | informs policy and does not define policies nor make decisions.
21 IV, 11. 5. 5| experts:~ ~1. biomarkers to define the risk of rejection and
22 IV, 11. 5. 5| donation and its outcome and define the limits of organ’s safety
23 IV, 11. 6. 4| such as positive lists to define benefits packages.~ ~Most
24 IV, 11. 6. 4| highly developed and used to define services negatively or positively.~ ~
25 IV, 11. 6. 4| There were attempts to define a more concise or ‘basic’
26 IV, 11. 6. 4| populations, it is necessary to define indicators, i.e. measures
27 IV, 11. 6. 4| healthcare providers) and to define the benchmark (i.e. the
28 IV, 12. 2 | to identify priorities, define indicators, produce guidelines
29 IV, 12. 2 | most European countries define, mainly at national level
30 IV, 13. 3 | methodological approach to define priorities, support decisions
31 IV, 13. 6. 2| measures are difficult to define and measure. Screening services
