Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1   II,     5.  5.  3|        incidence. ~ ~Literature reviews~ ~It is difficult to measure
 2   II,     5.  5.  3|        resulted from literature reviews should be carefully used
 3   II,     5.  5.  3|       and rising secular trend. Reviews that have downplayed the
 4   II,     5.  6.  5|       guidelines and systematic reviews, along with the opinion
 5   II,     5. 11.  2|         and updating systematic reviews of clinical trials relating
 6   II,     9.  3.  2|      for undertaking systematic reviews of deaths as for example
 7   II,     9.  3.  3|        et al, 2006). Systematic reviews have shown school-based
 8   II,     9.  3.  3|        et al, 2006). Systematic reviews have focused mainly on the
 9   II,     9.  5.  3|     over Europe (EIWH, 2006).~ ~Reviews of caring responsibilities
10  III,    10.  2.  1|         than others. Systematic reviews have suggested that alcohol
11  III,    10.  2.  1|    drink every second day. Some reviews have suggested that the
12  III,    10.  2.  1|         Many careful systematic reviews have evaluated school based
13  III,    10.  2.  1| Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 2. Art. No.:
14  III,    10.  2.  1|    obesity in Portugal. Obesity Reviews 7:233-237.~ ~Dolman R, Kingdon
15  III,    10.  2.  1|       in public health. Obesity Reviews 5(Suppl. 1):4-104.~ ~Lobstein
16  III,    10.  2.  1|     children in Europe. Obesity Reviews 4:195-200.~Mackenbach JP,
17  III,    10.  2.  1| Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 20:CD001871.~ ~Surkan PJ,
18  III,    10.  2.  4|         to open consent. Nature Reviews Genetics, AOP, published
19  III,    10.  4.  1| construction materials. Several reviews find respiratory problems,
20  III,    10.  4.  2|      second: EFSA (PRAPeR) peer reviews the DAR at EU level with
21  III,    10.  5.  1|      the urban environment. In: Reviews on Environmental Health
22  III,    10.  5.  1|       Health: a new agenda? In: Reviews on Environmental Health
23  III,    10.  5.  1|      and health. Sleep Medicine Reviews 11(2): 135-142.~ ~Norback
24   IV,    11.  6    |       healthcare~ ~This section reviews the ways in which healthcare
25   IV,    11.  6.  4|       as independent systematic reviews, stakeholder involvement
26   IV,    12.  2    |         Many careful systematic reviews have evaluated school based