Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1    I,     2.  3    |         to the USA, Australia and Canada, while vacancies in highly
 2    I,     2.  5    |         to the USA, Australia and Canada, while vacancies in highly
 3   II,     5.  5.  3|     States as well as the USA and Canada participated (Finland, Norway,
 4   II,     5.  5.  3|      Switzerland, Wales, Denmark, Canada, Latvia, Poland, Belgium (
 5   II,     5.  7.  3|        Whereas incidence rates in Canada (160 pmp in 2005) are similar
 6   II,     5.  7.  7|          renal disease in Europe, Canada and the Asia-Pacific region,
 7   II,     5. 14.  3|      burden for ageing adults. In Canada, Locker reported that one
 8   II,     6.  4.  4| institutes of the EU, the US-CDC, Canada and other parts of the world.~ ~
 9   II,     8.  2.  1|          health inequalities – in Canada, for example (Ouellette-Kuntz
10   II,     9.  1.  2|       folic acid fortification in Canada. New Engl J Med 2007;357:
11  III,    10.  4.  1|    Several studies in the USA and Canada (6-city study, 12-city and
12  III,    10.  4.  2|     United Kingdom, Germany, USA, Canada). The public health implications
13  III,    10.  4.  2| regulations~ ~ Episode in 1987 in Canada:~3 deaths, 105 intoxications~ ~
14   IV,    11.  1.  3|           The Conference Board of Canada, 2004). These, among others,
15   IV,    11.  2.  1|     Norway (along with the US and Canada) with much lower rates in
16   IV,    11.  3.  1|        Australia, New Zealand and Canada had the highest shares of
17   IV,    11.  6.  5|           The Conference Board of Canada (2004): Understanding health
18   IV,    11.  6.  5|           The Conference Board of Canada.~ ~Thomson S, Mossialos
19   IV,    12.  8    |          or their counterparts in Canada and other countries.~ ~The