Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 I, 2. 10. 3 | i2010 programme include:~ ~A review of e-Business policies and
2 I, 2. 10. 3 | take-up of ICT and e-Business.~Review of standardisation for ICT.~
3 I, 2. 10. 3 | initiatives under i2010 is the review of the competitiveness of
4 I, 2. 10. 3 | on Health Telematics to review the introduction of information
5 I, 2. 10. 3(7)| technology. International Labour Review. Geneva, ILO; 134(4-5),587-
6 I, 2. 11 | technology. International Labour Review. Geneva, ILO; 134(4-5),587-
7 I, 2. 11 | barriers to health care: a review of disparities in health
8 II, 4. 1 | estimates for the EU25, review the trends in life expectancy
9 II, 4. 3 | Population and Development Review 16(3): 403-432.~ ~Robine,
10 II, 4. 3 | Healthy People 2010 Midcourse Review: Executive summary. Washington,
11 II, 5. 2. 6 | necrosis and brought to a review in the definition of AMI,
12 II, 5. 3. 7 | identified:~· Further reduce the review time for the marketing authorization
13 II, 5. 4. 6 | stronger compared to the last review, because of the greater
14 II, 5. 4. 8 | type 2 diabetes: literature review and economic modelling Health
15 II, 5. 5. 1 | systems.~o The European Review of Suicide and Violence
16 II, 5. 5. 1 | providers before suicide: a review of the evidence. Am J Psychiatry
17 II, 5. 5. 1 | of self-harm. Systematic review. Bri J Psychiatry 181:193-
18 II, 5. 5. 1 | depression: a systematic review. Am J Med 118(4):330-41.~ ~
19 II, 5. 5. 2 | experts conducted a systematic review of published studies on
20 II, 5. 5. 2 | of writing a descriptive review of risk factors for dementia
21 II, 5. 5. 2 | preventively about dementia: a review, International Journal of
22 II, 5. 5. 2 | population-based context. Annual Review of Public Health 25: 1-24.~ ~
23 II, 5. 5. 3 | data basis, is a systematic review of literature that can base
24 II, 5. 5. 3 | studies) were reviewed. The review analysed indicators such
25 II, 5. 5. 3 | makers should regularly review the effectiveness of programmes
26 II, 5. 5. 3 | Disorders: A Systematic review of the Literature. International
27 II, 5. 5. 3 | W, van Hoeken D, (2003): Review of the Prevalence and Incidence
28 II, 5. 5. 3 | According to a systematic review (Saha et al, 2005) of prevalence
29 II, 5. 5. 3 | available most comprehensive review on prevalence data identified
30 II, 5. 5. 3 | recently published systematic review. Based on population-based
31 II, 5. 5. 3 | suicide. According to a recent review of the literature on physical
32 II, 5. 5. 3 | According to a literature review on the treatment gap in
33 II, 5. 5. 3 | schizophrenia: A comprehensive review of recent literature. J
34 II, 5. 5. 3 | illness and schizophrenia: a review of the literature. Acta
35 II, 5. 5. 3 | McGrath J (2005): A systematic review of the prevalence of schizophrenia
36 II, 5. 5. 3 | McGrrath J (2007): A systematic review of mortality in schizophrenia:
37 II, 5. 5. 3 | factors for ASD.~A systematic review of prevalence studies has
38 II, 5. 5. 3 | Denmark ~All ages ~MR review~333 ~7.6 ~Joensen, 1986 (*)~
39 II, 5. 5. 3 | 1999~Estonia ~Adults ~MR review and examination~396 ~5.3 ~
40 II, 5. 5. 3 | 2003 (*)~Finland~Adults ~MR review and examination~1233 ~6.
41 II, 5. 5. 3 | Children ~Retrospective/MR review and examination ~329/348 ~
42 II, 5. 5. 3 | Iceland ~All ages ~MR review~428 ~4.8 ~Olafsson and Hauser,
43 II, 5. 5. 3 | Italy ~All ages ~MR review and examination MR review/
44 II, 5. 5. 3 | review and examination MR review/MR review and Examination/
45 II, 5. 5. 3 | examination MR review/MR review and Examination/AED consumption
46 II, 5. 5. 3 | consumption door-to-door survey/MR review and examination~278/51~ ~
47 II, 5. 5. 3 | 2005~Italy ~Children ~MR review~? ~4.5 + ~Cavazzuti, 1986 (*)~
48 II, 5. 5. 3 | Lithuania~Children ~MR review~378 ~4.3 ~Endziniene et
49 II, 5. 5. 3 | 1997~Norway ~Children ~MR review and examination~198 ~5.3 -~
50 II, 5. 5. 3 | Norway ~All ages? ~MR review and GP contacts~245 ~2.3 ~
51 II, 5. 5. 3 | Poland~All ages ~MR review~337.8 ~ ~Zielinski, 1974 (*)~
52 II, 5. 5. 3 | Multisource medical register review~713 ~5.5 ~Forsgren, 1992 (*)~
53 II, 5. 5. 3 | and GP and P inquiry/MR review? ~155/195 ~4.2/3.5~Sidenvall
54 II, 5. 5. 3 | Children 4-20 years ~MR review ~69 ~4.3 ~Tidman et al.,
55 II, 5. 5. 3 | seizure: a quantitative review. Neurology 41:965-972.~Berg
56 II, 5. 5. 3 | the patient’s perspective: review of results of a community-based
57 II, 5. 5. 3 | in Europe – a systematic review. Eur J Neurol 12:245-253.~
58 II, 5. 5. 3 | et al (2002): Systematic review and meta-analysis of incidence
59 II, 5. 5. 3 | sudden unexpected death: a review. Epilepsia 38(suppl 11):
60 II, 5. 5. 3 | and employment: literature review. Epilepsy Behav 10:354-362.~
61 II, 5. 5. 3 | Medical risks in epilepsy: a review with focus on physical injuries,
62 II, 5. 5. 3 | in Europe; good practice review of MS treatments and therapies,
63 II, 5. 5. 3 | to the society. A recent review estimated costs due to PD
64 II, 5. 5. 3 | EUROSTAT, 2002). Several recent review articles are available (
65 II, 5. 5. 3 | by disease severity~ ~The review has revealed that: i) PD
66 II, 5. 5. 3 | Shenton CL, Salek SS (2006): A review of the health-related quality
67 II, 5. 5. 3 | Rascol O, Sampaio C (2006): Review of the therapeutic management
68 II, 5. 5. 3 | Counsell C (2003): Systematic review of incidence studies of
69 II, 5. 6. 3 | Health).~ ~Incidence~ ~A review of European studies using
70 II, 5. 6. 5 | strategies are based on a review of the evidence from existing
71 II, 5. 6. 6 | arthritis register with a review of the literature. I. Risk
72 II, 5. 7. 2 | sources~ ~ ~The present review is based on a compilation
73 II, 5. 7. 3 | the data collected in this review. Indeed the prevalence of
74 II, 5. 7. 3 | the data collected in this review. Indeed, the prevalence
75 II, 5. 7. 7 | mortality risk: a systematic review. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006 Jul;
76 II, 5. 8. 3 | WHO’s Large Analysis and Review of Housing and Health Status
77 II, 5. 8. 3 | the WHO Large Analysis and Review of European Housing and
78 II, 5. 8. 4 | Marco et al, 2004).~ ~In a review of community or general
79 II, 5. 8. 7 | burden of COPD: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir
80 II, 5. 8. 7 | pulmonary disease (COPD). A review. Nord J Psychiatry 2004;
81 II, 5. 9. 2 | data have been published; a review by von Hertzen and Haahtela
82 II, 5. 9. 3 | since the early 60s. The review by von Hertzen and Haahtela (
83 II, 5. 9. 3 | in Europe, 2003).~ ~In a review of nine studies carried
84 II, 5. 9. 7 | of control? A structured review of recent patient surveys,
85 II, 5. 10. 2 | which is the most updated review of available data on FA
86 II, 5. 10. 7 | food allergy research: a review. Allergy 61,1336-1343.~ ~
87 II, 5. 10. 7 | 56: 91-102.~Tay L (2006): Review of the development of methodology
88 II, 5. 11. 2 | has been integrated by a review of more recent literature
89 II, 5. 11. 7 | Hay R (2005): Literature review. Onychomycosis. J Eur Acad
90 II, 5. 12. 7 | infection: a systematic review. Int J Cancer 111:1-8.~ ~
91 II, 5. 13 | Moreover, a systematic review shows that childhood obesity
92 II, 5. 14. 2 | survey data, and literature review. Major sources of information
93 II, 5. 15. 4 | Medicines Agency (EMEA) to review designation applications
94 II, 5. 15. 6 | for a national orphan drug review policy. CMAJ. 2006 Jan 17;
95 II, 8. 2. 2 | as from a comprehensive review of available data (Gilbert
96 II, 8. 2. 2 | blindness and low vision~ ~A review and selection, based on
97 II, 8. 2. 2 | 3. Data Description~ ~A review and selection, based on
98 II, 8. 2. 2 | impairment in children: a review of available data. Ophthalmic
99 II, 9. 1. 1 | developed after an extensive review of existing perinatal health
100 II, 9. 1. 2 | EUROCAT Special Report: A Review of Environmental Risk Factors
101 II, 9. 1. 2 | and newborns: a systematic review. HTA Assessment 2004; Vol
102 II, 9. 1. 2 | birth defects – a systematic review. Hum Reprod 2005; 20:328-
103 II, 9. 3. 1 | than in women. A recent review made for the American College
104 II, 9. 3. 1 | in Europe – a systematic review. European Journal of Neurology,
105 II, 9. 3. 1 | to help-seeking by men: a review of sociocultural and clinical
106 II, 9. 3. 1 | sensitivity. Mental Health Review Journal, 11(4), 3-6.~ ~White
107 II, 9. 3. 3 | database, 2007).~· Systematic review conducted by REPROSTAT 2
108 II, 9. 3. 3 | countries: a systematic review. Eur J Public Health. 0:
109 II, 9. 4. 3 | therapy input and outpatient review (Bhalla et al, 2004).~ ~
110 II, 9. 4. 7 | Older People: A European Review. Journal of Integrated Care
111 II, 9. 4. 7 | people across Europe: a review of the longitudinal results
112 II, 9. 5. 4 | for gender balance;~· The review and amendment of pre-2006
113 II, 9. 5. 6 | in safety and health - A review. Luxembourg: Office for
114 II, 9. 5. 6 | health – an evidence based review. Geneva. Available at: http://
115 III, 10. 1. 3 | family factors. A critical review. Recent Dev Alcohol 7:147-
116 III, 10. 1. 3 | Intergenerational effects – a review of environmentally oriented
117 III, 10. 1. 3 | Intergenerational effects – a review of environmentally oriented
118 III, 10. 2. 1 | future. Drug and Alcohol Review, 2006; 25: 59-71~ ~Janson
119 III, 10. 2. 1 | concentration levels. A review of 112 studies provided
120 III, 10. 2. 1 | alcohol-impaired driving a systematic review Am J Prev Med Jun;28(5 Suppl):
121 III, 10. 2. 1 | Witty K, Bellis M (2007): A review of the effectiveness and
122 III, 10. 2. 1 | old Alcohol and schools: Review of effectiveness and cost
123 III, 10. 2. 1 | 1995) Drug prevention: a review of legislation, regulation
124 III, 10. 2. 1 | survey data, and literature review. Data are obtainable from
125 III, 10. 2. 1 | teachers to plan, do and review activities.~ ~Individuals
126 III, 10. 2. 1 | toothpaste: a systematic review. Acta Odontol Scand 2003;
127 III, 10. 2. 1 | physical activity~A recent review of instruments currently
128 III, 10. 2. 1 | physical activity (WHO, 2006g). This review aims at inspiring policy-makers
129 III, 10. 2. 1 | Exercise and mental health: a review. Journal of the Royal Society
130 III, 10. 2. 1 | Socioeconomic status and obesity: a review of the literature. Psychological
131 III, 10. 2. 1 | self-esteem. Sport Science Review, 12:123-155.~ ~TNS Opinion
132 III, 10. 2. 1 | Moreover, a systematic review shows that childhood obesity
133 III, 10. 2. 1 | unbalances~ ~The present review builds upon the compilation
134 III, 10. 2. 1 | country were identified, this review only presents the objective
135 III, 10. 2. 1 | Lobstein et al, 2004). This review uses the definition based
136 III, 10. 2. 1 | a systematic literature review of the effectiveness of (
137 III, 10. 2. 1 | individual needs. Another review looking at the effectiveness
138 III, 10. 2. 1 | Commission will carry out a review of progress in 2010 to review
139 III, 10. 2. 1 | review of progress in 2010 to review obesity status, to observe
140 III, 10. 2. 1 | in women: an integrative review of the literature. Journal
141 III, 10. 2. 1 | developing countries: a review. Bulletin of the World Health
142 III, 10. 2. 1 | Socioeconomic status and obesity: a review of the literature. Psychological
143 III, 10. 2. 1 | children aged 1 to 5 years: a review. London, Health Education
144 III, 10. 2. 1 | selenoproteins and human health: a review Public Health Nutr. 4: 593-
145 III, 10. 3. 1 | and cardiovascular risk. Review and synthesis of epidemiological
146 III, 10. 3. 2 | Norway (htt ). The EPER review report 2004 reveals that
147 III, 10. 3. 2 | Health and Environment: a Review of Evidence. A Joint Report
148 III, 10. 3. 4 | adaptation during 2007. The review of the EU-ETS has started
149 III, 10. 3. 4 | investigated . A systematic review of post-traumatic stress
150 III, 10. 4. 1 | fully developed yet, this review is only partly based on
151 III, 10. 4. 1 | WHO Project “Systematic Review of Health Aspects of Air
152 III, 10. 4. 2 | Pesticide Risk Assessment Peer Review Unit is responsible for
153 III, 10. 4. 2 | responsible for the peer review of active substances used
154 III, 10. 4. 2 | pesticides, the Commission will review the temporary MRLs established
155 III, 10. 4. 2 | would modify the JECFA 2002 review and derived ADI values for
156 III, 10. 4. 2 | EFSA provided a summary review of the biological processes
157 III, 10. 4. 2 | all active substances;~· Review programme for all MRLs~·
158 III, 10. 4. 2 | consumes Article 32 ;~· peer review of active substances.~ ~
159 III, 10. 4. 2 | framework of the EFSA peer review for the risk assessment
160 III, 10. 4. 2 | SCPHAW).~ ~Pesticides peer review phases are as indicated
161 III, 10. 4. 2 | contentious) issues;~· joint peer review of the risk assessment by
162 III, 10. 4. 2 | cornerstone of the peer review occurs thorugh the meetings
163 III, 10. 4. 2 | 10.4.2.2. Pesticides Peer review – status: evaluation of
164 III, 10. 4. 2 | main goals of PRAPeR peer review in the future include:~·
165 III, 10. 4. 2 | asked by the Commission to review the latest draft Annexes
166 III, 10. 4. 3 | 3.2. Data sources~ ~This review is based on the first outcomes
167 III, 10. 4. 5 | aereosols.~ ~Data sources~This review is based on the WHO Guidelines
168 III, 10. 4. 5 | environment.~ ~Data sources~ ~This review is primarily based on the
169 III, 10. 4. 5 | WHO Europe has produced a review “Population health and waste
170 III, 10. 4. 5 | waste landfill sites: A review of the Epidemiological literature.
171 III, 10. 5. 1 | 13:53-64.~ DEFRA (2004): Review of environmental and health
172 III, 10. 5. 1 | performance? A critical review of the literature. Indoor
173 III, 10. 5. 1 | Indoor Air. 2005, 15:27-52. Review. Erratum in: Indoor Air. (
174 III, 10. 5. 1 | related to asthma?: literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing
175 III, 10. 5. 1 | in settled school dust: a review of findings and significant
176 III, 10. 5. 2 | a number of research and review articles which will be referenced
177 III, 10. 5. 2 | A valid and consistent review of rural and urban health
178 III, 10. 5. 3 | 2001): A Comprehensive Review of the Literature. American
179 III, 10. 5. 3 | retention and mental health: a review of the literature. London,
180 IV, 11. 1. 3 | measurement. Their findings and review of the literature demonstrate
181 IV, 11. 1. 5 | approaches such as peer review/visitation, clinical audit,
182 IV, 11. 1. 6 | systems vary across Europe. A review of the methodology used
183 IV, 11. 2. 1 | cardiovascular disease and cancer. A review of DMPs found they improve
184 IV, 11. 4 | epidemiology~· Systematic review of published evidence~·
185 IV, 11. 4 | of systematic search and review of published evidence on
186 IV, 11. 4 | economic evaluation and a review of manufacturers’ submissions.
187 IV, 11. 6. 2 | Thomson et al, 2003). A review of the literature shows
188 IV, 11. 6. 4 | independent assessments.~ ~Most review bodies can be categorized
189 IV, 11. 6. 4 | greater reliance on HTA to review existing and new services
190 IV, 11. 6. 5 | results from a systematic review of the literature and methodological
191 IV, 11. 6. 5 | health financing in Europe: a review. Oxford, Blackwell Publishing
192 IV, 11. 6. 5 | medical care." Medical Care Review 37(7): 653-98.~ ~Dovey SM,
193 IV, 11. 6. 5 | Theory: An Assessment and Review." Academy of Management
194 IV, 11. 6. 5 | Academy of Management Review 14 ,(4): 57-74.~ ~Epstein
195 IV, 11. 6. 5 | forthcoming): "A literature review of cost sharing for prescription
196 IV, 11. 6. 5 | et al. (2006): Cochrane Review: Capitation, salary, fee-for-service
197 IV, 11. 6. 5 | mortality and health services:a review of aggregate data studies.
198 IV, 11. 6. 5 | International Social Security Review 59(3): 3-25.~ ~Mossialos
199 IV, 11. 6. 5 | prescribing in Europe." Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes
200 IV, 11. 6. 5 | The American Economic Review 58: 531-537.~ ~Perleth M,
201 IV, 11. 6. 5 | health problem." Annual Review of Public Health 23: 135-
202 IV, 11. 6. 5 | Medical Care Research and Review 53: 243-66.~ ~Robinson JC,
203 IV, 11. 6. 5 | Medical Care Research and Review 63(2): 135-57.~ ~Rutstein
204 IV, 12. 2 | Strategy to 2013, when a review will take place to support
205 IV, 12. 6 | give it an opportunity to review issues as appropriate. The
206 IV, 12. 10 | 2001).~Tobacco Free Policy Review Group established (1998 –
207 IV, 12. 10 | Hygiene~Services Quality Review~(last review published Nov
208 IV, 12. 10 | Services Quality Review~(last review published Nov 2007)~ ~The
209 IV, 12. 10 | automatic and independent~review of involuntary detentions
210 IV, 12. 10 | of health inequities, 3) review of policies on alcohol and
211 IV, 13. 8 | Organisations (CSOs).~ ~A review of the NGO status in Europe
