Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 -, 1 | Ministries of Health (or by the Scientific Institutions appointed by
2 -, 1 | manuscripts with high-quality scientific analyses and comments on
3 -, 1 | Iacontino for different scientific and administrative aspects.
4 I, 2. 1 | socio-economic, environmental, scientific, technological and institutional
5 I, 2. 10. 4 | identification in the San Raffaele Scientific Institute in Italy resulted
6 I, 2. 10. 4(20)| Chain “, Dr. Alberto Sanna, Scientific Institute Hospital San Raffaele
7 I, 2. 11 | al. (2007): Ethical and Scientific Issues of Nanotechnology
8 II, 4. 1 | these expectations, the scientific community should work on
9 II, 5. 3. 2 | gave voice to the European scientific community in a document
10 II, 5. 3. 2 | carcinogenesis, and to develop scientific strategies for cancer control.
11 II, 5. 3. 2 | research and disseminates scientific information through publications,
12 II, 5. 3. 7 | cancer.~ ~The international scientific community indicates that
13 II, 5. 3. 7 | importance of NCP is stressed by scientific research and patient community (
14 II, 5. 3. 9 | Code Against Cancer and scientific justification: third version.
15 II, 5. 4. 4 | gaining credibility from scientific evidence, i.e. the measuring
16 II, 5. 4. 4 | Governments: we know from scientific literature that the current
17 II, 5. 4. 4 | alarming, as we know from scientific evidence that the rise of
18 II, 5. 4. 6 | the direct contribution of scientific associations.~One important
19 II, 5. 5. 3 | is well accepted in the scientific community that early and
20 II, 5. 5. 3 | 20 years have alerted the scientific community and public health
21 II, 5. 5. 3 | summarizing the current scientific position on epilepsy and
22 II, 5. 5. 3 | national and international scientific associations (ILAE, IBE.
23 II, 5. 5. 3 | published in the international scientific peer-reviewed literature (
24 II, 5. 5. 3 | reported in non-English scientific literature or from local
25 II, 5. 5. 3 | 000 are reported in the scientific literature. An overview
26 II, 5. 5. 3 | will be made available in scientific literature.~Early published
27 II, 5. 5. 3 | international, peer-reviewed, scientific journal reporting the results.
28 II, 5. 5. 3 | there is a vast amount of scientific literature dealing with
29 II, 5. 5. 3 | national and international scientific associations or by national
30 II, 5. 6. 6 | Millenium. Report of a WHO Scientific Group. TRS 919. Geneva,
31 II, 5. 9. FB | introduced, together with scientific and evidence-based preventive
32 II, 5. 9. 5 | introduced, together with scientific and evidence-based preventive
33 II, 5. 9. 5 | moment there is not enough scientific evidence of the effectiveness
34 II, 5. 10.Acr | IgE~Immunoglobulin E~SCF~Scientific Committee for Food~
35 II, 5. 10. 2 | includes the common name, scientific name, occurrence, allergy
36 II, 5. 10. 2 | exhibit adverse reactions, the Scientific Committee for Food (SCF)
37 II, 5. 10. 2 | from the Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products,
38 II, 5. 10. 5 | the industry to provide scientific justification for that,
39 II, 5. 10. 5 | at any time based on new scientific evidence.~ ~
40 II, 5. 10. 7 | 2004): Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products,
41 II, 5. 10. 7 | EU SCOOP (European Union Scientific Cooperation) (1998): Report
42 II, 5. 10. 7 | experts participating in EU Scientific Cooperation. Task 7.2 entitled “
43 II, 5. 10. 7 | Immunol 120, 638-646.~ ~Scientific Committee for Foods (SCF) (
44 II, 5. 10. 7 | ingredients. Reports of the Scientific Committee for Foods, Thirty-seventh
45 II, 5. 11. 3 | with the aim of providing scientific information necessary for
46 II, 5. 14. 2 | ministries of health and scientific reports from population
47 II, 5. 15. 1 | approach in the areas of scientific and biomedical research,
48 II, 6. 2 | and relevant articles from scientific journals2.~ ~However, the
49 II, 6. 3. 1 | more and better data and scientific studies are needed to clearly
50 II, 6. 4. 2 | is in charge of providing scientific advice and risk assessment
51 II, 6. 4. 4 | activities on surveillance, scientific advice and risk assessment,
52 II, 6. 4. 4 | a key role in providing scientific and technical support to
53 II, 6. 4. 4 | to develop authoritative scientific opinions about the risks
54 II, 6. 4. 4 | new Centre also provides scientific co-operation within the
55 II, 7. 3. 5 | approach involving different scientific disciplines.~ ~Interpersonal
56 II, 7. 5 | sector. This offers a unique scientific and prevention-driven approach
57 II, 7. 5 | quarterly newsletter, a scientific journal (Injury Control
58 II, 8. 2. 1 | International Association for the Scientific Study of Intellectual Disabilities.
59 II, 8. 2. 2 | the report of a 1999 WHO scientific meeting (WHO, 2000), as
60 II, 8. 2. 2 | children. Report of a WHO/IAPB scientific meeting Hyderabad, India
61 II, 9 | are well documented in the scientific literature (Stillman et
62 II, 9. 1. 1 | DELPHI consensus process with scientific committees composed of clinicians,
63 II, 9. 1. 1 | reflects a solid base of scientific evidence, as well as the
64 II, 9. 1. 2 | are well documented in the scientific literature (Stillman et
65 II, 9. 1. 2 | different interpretations of the scientific evidence in the design and
66 II, 9. 1. 2 | protecting the foetus despite scientific uncertainty, particularly
67 II, 9. 2. 3 | rubella) vaccine. The apparent scientific evidence brought into this
68 II, 9. 2. 5 | Commission is able to provide scientific support to Member States
69 II, 9. 2. 6 | DG SANCO, including the Scientific Platform on behavioural
70 II, 9. 3. 1 | joint statement of three Scientific Societies - the International
71 II, 9. 3. 3 | European studies published in scientific journals.~· Data from national
72 II, 9. 5. 4 | programmes, and to reinforce the scientific evidence on the effectiveness
73 II, 9. 5. 6 | medicine: a vital part of scientific rationality. A useful model
74 III, 10. 1. 3 | what we need to know. A scientific statement from the American
75 III, 10. 2. 1 | and Development~SCENIHR~Scientific Committee on Emerging and
76 III, 10. 2. 1 | reviewing the ban and its Scientific Committee on Emerging and
77 III, 10. 2. 1 | that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support the
78 III, 10. 2. 1 | Code Against Cancer and scientific justification: third version (
79 III, 10. 2. 1 | in a context in which no scientific or methodological guarantees
80 III, 10. 2. 1 | 1,000 ppm. Although the scientific literature does not evaluate
81 III, 10. 2. 1 | context specific questions. A scientific analysis of this survey
82 III, 10. 2. 1 | estimates for Switzerland. Scientific position statement of the
83 III, 10. 2. 1 | School Fruit Scheme~SCF~Scientific Committee on Food~UNECE~
84 III, 10. 2. 1 | assessments by the EFSA Scientific Panels and Member States.
85 III, 10. 2. 1 | the recommendation of the Scientific Committee on Food (SCF)
86 III, 10. 2. 1 | published in a number of scientific papers. In particular, the
87 III, 10. 2. 1 | dietary guidelines(FBDG)~ ~A Scientific Colloquium was organized
88 III, 10. 2. 1 | the above-mentioned EFSA’s scientific colloquium. One approach
89 III, 10. 2. 1 | depending on aims and underlying scientific data (Figure 10.2.1.7.7).~ ~
90 III, 10. 2. 1 | 2007).~ ~There are several scientific approaches to collect information
91 III, 10. 2. 1 | evaluation of an appropriate scientific dossier concerning the safety
92 III, 10. 2. 1 | evaluation of an appropriate scientific dossier concerning the safety
93 III, 10. 2. 1 | 2004 - results]. Brussels, Scientific Institute of Public Health,
94 III, 10. 2. 1 | Guidelines - SUMMARY REPORT. EFSA SCIENTIFIC COLLOQUIUM, Parma, Italy,
95 III, 10. 2. 1 | www.efsa.europa.eu/EFSA/Scientific_Document/sc_colloque5_fbdg_
96 III, 10. 2. 1 | Am J Clin Nutr 22: 1-8.~ ~Scientific Committee for Food (SCF):
97 III, 10. 2. 1 | Food (SCF): Report of the Scientific Committee for Food. Nutrition
98 III, 10. 2. 4 | United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural~ ~Organization~
99 III, 10. 2. 4 | globally, that will enable the scientific advances to be effectively,
100 III, 10. 2. 4 | globally, that will enable the scientific advances to be effectively,
101 III, 10. 2. 4 | Human Genome Epidemiology. A Scientific Foundation for Using Genetic
102 III, 10. 2. 5 | present section is built on scientific papers published in the
103 III, 10. 2. 5 | An increasing number of scientific studies indicate the role
104 III, 10. 3. 1 | Resonance Imaging~SCENIHR~Scientific Committee on Emerging and
105 III, 10. 3. 1 | public concern and several scientific studies, there is still
106 III, 10. 3. 1 | and the European Union Scientific Committee on Emerging and
107 III, 10. 3. 1 | frequency. The European Union Scientific Committee on Emerging and
108 III, 10. 3. 1 | opinion is primarily based on scientific articles, published in English
109 III, 10. 3. 1 | English language peer-reviewed scientific journals. The opinion is
110 III, 10. 3. 1 | concern than based on a strict scientific and social cost-benefit
111 III, 10. 3. 1 | taking into account recent scientific and technical evidence.~ ~
112 III, 10. 3. 1 | the incorporation of new scientific findings and more informed
113 III, 10. 3. 1 | directive (htt )~European Union Scientific Committee on Emerging and
114 III, 10. 3. 2 | in the light of increased scientific knowledge and new uses.
115 III, 10. 3. 2 | reviewed and quality checked by scientific experts and policymakers
116 III, 10. 3. 2 | An increasing number of scientific studies indicate the role
117 III, 10. 3. 4 | or vulnerable to heat.~ ~Scientific methodologies and data gaps
118 III, 10. 4. 1 | reviewed and quality checked by scientific experts and policymakers
119 III, 10. 4. 1 | indicators and mainly on scientific knowledge, assessments and
120 III, 10. 4. 2 | stricter separation of the scientific and political elements of
121 III, 10. 4. 2 | relentless evolution of scientific knowledge, constantly push
122 III, 10. 4. 2 | the Commission providing scientific support to underpin food
123 III, 10. 4. 2 | structures and mechanisms for the scientific and technical evaluations
124 III, 10. 4. 2 | information in addition to the scientific risk assessment. These include,
125 III, 10. 4. 2 | are not just based on a scientific assessment of risk but also
126 III, 10. 4. 2 | protect health although scientific information concerning the
127 III, 10. 4. 2 | while seeking more complete scientific evidence and other data.
128 III, 10. 4. 2 | Safety Authority (EFSA)~ ~Scientific assessment of risk must
129 III, 10. 4. 2 | levels of independence, scientific excellence and transparency.
130 III, 10. 4. 2 | hold responsibility for scientific risk assessment and risk
131 III, 10. 4. 2 | collaboration with national scientific agencies and institutions.
132 III, 10. 4. 2 | Authority would provide scientific advice, collate and analyse
133 III, 10. 4. 2 | EFSA acts as an independent scientific source of advice, information
134 III, 10. 4. 2 | to specific requests for scientific advice mainly coming from
135 III, 10. 4. 2 | delivered more than 500 scientific opinions on a wide variety
136 III, 10. 4. 2 | collecting and analysing scientific data to ensure European
137 III, 10. 4. 2 | supported by the most complete scientific information available. This
138 III, 10. 4. 2 | and (10) plant health. The Scientific Committee supports and coordinates
139 III, 10. 4. 2 | supports and coordinates the scientific panels to ensure consistency
140 III, 10. 4. 2 | ensure consistency in the scientific opinions they produce.~ ~
141 III, 10. 4. 2 | measures, based on sound scientific opinions, include:~ ~· A
142 III, 10. 4. 2 | procedure based on sound scientific evaluation and taking into
143 III, 10. 4. 2 | contaminants is based on scientific advice and the principle
144 III, 10. 4. 2 | pesticides) provides for a scientific evaluation before the products
145 III, 10. 4. 2 | compounds~ ~In 2002 the Scientific Committee on Food assessed
146 III, 10. 4. 2 | animals. While there are no scientific reasons to doubt this risk
147 III, 10. 4. 2 | therefore it undertakes scientific work on its own initiative.
148 III, 10. 4. 2 | as emerging risks where scientific knowledge and approaches
149 III, 10. 4. 2 | including all relevant scientific information relating to
150 III, 10. 4. 2 | maintained as a transparent sound scientific process separated from risk
151 III, 10. 4. 2 | provides independent scientific opinions and guidance for
152 III, 10. 4. 2 | 91/414 EEC);~· deals with scientific questions related to the
153 III, 10. 4. 2 | enviroment.~ ~The main fields of scientific activities are:~· Providing
154 III, 10. 4. 2 | activities are:~· Providing scientific opinions on generic opinions,
155 III, 10. 4. 2 | promoting new and harmonized scientific approaches and methodologies:
156 III, 10. 4. 2 | early 2008.~ ~EFSA organises scientific colloquia aimed at achieving
157 III, 10. 4. 2 | some of the fundamental scientific issues related to risk assessment
158 III, 10. 4. 2 | endorsed by the EFSA’s Scientific Committee to assess safety
159 III, 10. 4. 2 | safety assessment, available scientific papers do not indicate any
160 III, 10. 4. 2 | chemicals in food is a purely scientific process consisting of the
161 III, 10. 4. 2 | such internationally agreed scientific approach is available for
162 III, 10. 4. 2 | measurements. An ad hoc scientific Colloquium on this subject
163 III, 10. 4. 2 | Agencies(e.g. ECDL and EEA). A scientific Committee has undertaken
164 III, 10. 4. 2 | most current, independent scientific advice. By communicating
165 III, 10. 4. 2 | of assessments from its scientific panels by:~ ~· analysing
166 III, 10. 4. 2 | relentless evolution of scientific knowledge, constantly push
167 III, 10. 4. 2 | 2004): Summa Report of EFSA Scientific Colluquium on “Dioxins,
168 III, 10. 4. 2 | Summary Report of EFSA Scientific colloquium on “Risk-benefits
169 III, 10. 4. 2 | Summary Report of the Scientific Colloquium on “Cumulative
170 III, 10. 4. 2 | Summary Report of the Scientific Colloquium on “ Food producing
171 III, 10. 4. 2 | Summary Report of the Scientific Colloquium on “Qualified
172 III, 10. 4. 3 | However, in the view of new scientific findings, the health consequences
173 III, 10. 4. 5 | health and waste management: scientific data and policy options”
174 III, 10. 4. 5 | limitations, the available scientific literature on health effects
175 III, 10. 4. 5 | health and waste management: scientific data and policy options.
176 III, 10. 5. 1 | chapter is mostly taken from scientific publications and reports
177 III, 10. 5. 1 | Network is based on the scientific awareness that good urban
178 III, 10. 5. 1 | government. They compile and edit scientific awareness and turn the results
179 III, 10. 5. 2 | chapter is mostly taken from scientific publications and reports
180 III, 10. 5. 3 | and health as a field of scientific study in its own right,
181 III, 10. 5. 3 | position of enterprises. The scientific consensus is that preventive
182 III, 10. 5. 3 | prevention: Summary of the scientific evidence. IGA_Report 3.
183 IV, 11. 1. 5 | selected on the basis of scientific validity and reliability
184 IV, 11. 4 | rooted in research and the scientific method (EUnetHTA).~ ~The
185 IV, 11. 4 | make use of expert opinion, scientific advice, health statistics
186 IV, 11. 4 | HTA (HTAi) (ww g) and a scientific journal, International Journal
187 IV, 11. 4 | to controversy over the scientific soundness of HTA, as was
188 IV, 11. 4 | England between assessment (a scientific process and the role of
189 IV, 11. 5. 2 | transplant organizations and scientific societies operate in Europe~
190 IV, 11. 5. 4 | cancers has been described in scientific literature. The transmission
191 IV, 11. 5. 5 | coordinator and president of the scientific committee of the project
192 IV, 12. 4 | data~concerning health~JRC~Scientific and Technical Support in
193 IV, 12. 4 | safety.~ ~ ~Independent scientific advice plays an important
194 IV, 12. 4 | decision-making process. Three Scientific Committees have been established
195 IV, 12. 4 | established by DG SANCO to provide scientific advice on non-food related
196 IV, 12. 4 | what concerms independent scientific advise on border-crossing
197 IV, 12. 4 | and carry out technical, scientific and administrative aspects
198 IV, 12. 4 | Community with the best possible scientific and technical advice on
199 IV, 12. 4 | To provide objective scientific advice on all matters with
200 IV, 12. 4 | in 1995~http eu~To foster scientific excellence in the evaluation
201 IV, 12. 5 | 2.1. Support and enhance scientific advice and risk assessment
202 IV, 12. 8 | health’.~ ~Given the complex scientific and technical issues to
203 IV, 12. 10 | concerning the establishment of a Scientific Committee for monitoring
204 IV, 12. 10 | It is a non-governmental scientific association, operating on
205 IV, 12. 10 | its aim is to promote "the scientific research and study of obesity
206 IV, 12. 10 | Greece" as well as "the scientific research in the field of
207 IV, 13. 7. 3 | at European level, in all scientific and technological fields
208 IV, 13. 7. 3 | issues to be addressed by the scientific community. In addition to
209 IV, 13. 7. 3 | practical applications of new scientific knowledge.~ ~
