| | 
Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 I, 2. 6 | expected in all countries but Denmark and the Netherlands, and
2 I, 3. 1 | born outside marriage in Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France,
3 I, 3. 2 | currently: Austria, Belgium and Denmark, Finland, and Spain. A decline
4 I, 3. 3 | observation. Sweden and Denmark show some stagnation over
5 I, 3. 3 | shares, while Luxembourg, Denmark, Cyprus, Ireland and Turkey
6 I, 3. 3 | currently small shares in Italy, Denmark, Luxembourg, Germany, and
7 I, 3. 3 | than for Children. Sweden, Denmark, the United Kingdom, France
8 I, 3. 3 | and Cyprus, and high in Denmark, Sweden, the Czech Republic,
9 II, 4. 1 | compression of disability, whilst Denmark, the Netherlands, Sweden
10 II, 4. 1 | from the 1960s onwards. Denmark is also included though
11 II, 4. 2 | Western European countries Denmark showed a deviating pattern.
12 II, 5. 2. 2 | Northern European countries (Denmark, Ireland, Finland, Sweden,
13 II, 5. 2. 3(2) | Northern countries include: Denmark, Ireland, Finland, Sweden
14 II, 5. 3. 2 | started in 2005, involves Denmark, France, Hungary, Ireland,
15 II, 5. 3. 3 | Slovakia; Northern Europe: Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland,
16 II, 5. 3. 5 | cases per 100,000) and in Denmark for women (414 new cases
17 II, 5. 3. 5 | deaths per 100,000) and in Denmark for women (196 deaths per
18 II, 5. 3. 5 | 34 deaths per 100,000 (in Denmark). Mortality trends (Figure
19 II, 5. 3. 6 | Switzerland and Spain. Denmark and England had lower survival
20 II, 5. 3. 6 | on the other hand the UK, Denmark and Eastern European countries,
21 II, 5. 3. 6 | Survival in the UK and Denmark was intermediate at around
22 II, 5. 3. 6 | England, Scotland, Wales, Denmark, Malta and Portugal had
23 II, 5. 3. 6 | while the Czech Republic, Denmark, England, Estonia, Malta,
24 II, 5. 3. 6 | The main exceptions were Denmark, where estimates remained
25 II, 5. 3. 6 | 68%). The low survival in Denmark and the UK occurred in the
26 II, 5. 3. 6 | Nordic countries (except Denmark) and central Europe, intermediate
27 II, 5. 3. 6 | Europe, lower in the UK and Denmark, and worse in Eastern Europe.
28 II, 5. 3. 6 | TNEH) for most countries. Denmark and UK had lower all-cancer
29 II, 5. 3. 7 | CZECH REPUBLIC~Yes (2003)~DENMARK~Yes~GERMANY~No~ESTONIA~Yes~
30 II, 5. 4. 2 | Gudbjörnsdottir et al. 2003) and Denmark (Carstersen et al. 2008),
31 II, 5. 4. 3 | 000, with a median of 79 (Denmark). The indicator decreases
32 II, 5. 4. 3 | 79, with Poland (15%) and Denmark (12%) showing the highest
33 II, 5. 4. 3 | median value of 80% for Denmark.~Triglycerides level >2.
34 II, 5. 4. 3 | with a median of 30% for Denmark and Austria. There is a
35 II, 5. 4. 3 | for Ireland and 37% for Denmark, with a median value of
36 II, 5. 4. 3 | of 226, corresponding to Denmark. The trend increases with
37 II, 5. 5. 1 | and Italy and less so for Denmark, Slovakia and Latvia.~ ~
38 II, 5. 5. 1 | four countries (Sweden, Denmark, Great Britain, and Netherlands),
39 II, 5. 5. 1 | were Estonia, Latvia and Denmark with a percentage of annual
40 II, 5. 5. 3 | Sweden, Switzerland, Wales, Denmark, Canada, Latvia, Poland,
41 II, 5. 5. 3 | Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France,
42 II, 5. 5. 3 | Report of the pediatrician".~Denmark~ ~X~ ~Estonia~ ~X~There
43 II, 5. 5. 3 | Kingdom, Germany, Norway and Denmark). Thus, data from 62 articles (
44 II, 5. 5. 3 | Finland, 37% in Italy, 35% in Denmark, 34% in Hungary, 26% in
45 II, 5. 5. 3 | analysis of studies from Italy, Denmark, the Netherlands, Spain,
46 II, 5. 5. 3 | Belgium, the Netherlands, and Denmark) and the implementation
47 II, 5. 5. 3 | psychiatric ICD-10 Diagnosis in Denmark and Germany. Psychopathology
48 II, 5. 5. 3 | Netherlands, England, France and Denmark. Risk factors found in more
49 II, 5. 5. 3 | 000)~Reference(s), year~ ~Denmark ~All ages ~MR review~333 ~
50 II, 5. 5. 3 | contraindicated~ with driving~Denmark I 12 months Seizures during
51 II, 5. 5. 3 | MS of 94%. It links with Denmark’s Centralised Civil Registry,
52 II, 5. 5. 3 | to southeastern Norway, Denmark, southern Sweden, southwestern
53 II, 5. 5. 3 | epidemiological data on MS in Denmark that appear to be consistent
54 II, 5. 5. 3 | over time are reported for Denmark, Scotland, The Netherlands,
55 II, 5. 5. 3 | with multiple sclerosis in Denmark: a nationwide, long-term
56 II, 5. 5. 3 | and prevalence rates in Denmark 1948–64 based on the Danish
57 II, 5. 5. 3 | of multiple sclerosis in Denmark 1948-1982: a descriptive
58 II, 5. 7. 2 | States (Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Greece, Sweden
59 II, 5. 7. 2 | States (Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Greece, Spain,
60 II, 5. 8. 3 | performed in Copenhagen, Denmark, 8045 men and women aged
61 II, 5. 8. 4 | performed in Copenhagen, Denmark, 8045 men and women aged
62 II, 5. 8. 7 | treating patients with COPD in Denmark -- a population study of
63 II, 5. 9. 4 | ECRHS) in Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Iceland and Estonia found
64 II, 5. 11. 3 | which varied from 1.1% in Denmark to 17.6% in Italy, and to
65 II, 5. 11. 3 | responses. In another study from Denmark, after validation of a subset
66 II, 5. 11. 3 | incidences in Europe have been in Denmark (2.9%) and the Faeroe Islands (
67 II, 5. 11. 5 | reducing contact dermatitis. In Denmark for instance, a legislation
68 II, 5. 12. 2 | available only up to 1996, for Denmark up to 2001, and for Switzerland
69 II, 5. 12. 3 | mortality in European men: Denmark whose rates increased from
70 II, 5. 12. 3 | a few Nordic countries (Denmark and Finland), the UK, central
71 II, 5. 14. 2 | health services system. In Denmark, an advanced computer system
72 II, 5. 14. 3 | corresponding figure for Denmark is 1.0 DMF-T.~ ~Table 5.
73 II, 6. 3. 3 | countries (Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Hungary,
74 II, 6. 3. 3 | descending order) UK, Sweden, Denmark and Norway. The highest
75 II, 6. 3. 3 | per 100 000, followed by Denmark with 441.29 per 100 000.
76 II, 6. 3. 4 | in western countries like Denmark, the Netherlands, Sweden
77 II, 6. 3. 5 | countries, with the exception of Denmark (declining) and the UK (
78 II, 6. 3. 6 | countries – the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Latvia
79 II, 6. 3. 6 | reported 1 491 cases in 2005. Denmark (0.85 per 100 000), followed
80 II, 6. 3. 6 | France (37 cases) and Denmark (three cases).~ ~Brucellosis~ ~
81 II, 7. 2. 6 | countries - Austria, Cyprus, Denmark, France, Germany (regional),
82 II, 7. 2. 6 | countries – Austria, Cyprus, Denmark, Ireland, Latvia, Netherlands,
83 II, 8. 2. 1 | Sillanpää, 2003).~ ~In Aarhus (Denmark) an epidemiological census
84 II, 8. 2. 2 | countries in this area (Denmark, Finland, Ireland, Italy,
85 II, 8. 2. 2 | countries in this area (Denmark, Finland, Ireland, Italy,
86 II, 8. 2. 3 | representative population samples of Denmark, Finland, Italy, Sweden
87 II, 8. 2. 3 | greater noise exposure. In Denmark and Finland, the prevalence
88 II, 9 | girls is especially high in Denmark, the Netherlands and the
89 II, 9 | last 12 months peaks in Denmark (WHO/HSBC, 2004; www rg
90 II, 9. 1. 1 | primiparous women at low risk in Denmark: population based study.
91 II, 9. 1. 2 | Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Denmark).~ ~Table 9.1.2.3 shows
92 II, 9. 1. 2 | Germany, the Netherlands and Denmark had rates between 1.3 and
93 II, 9. 2. 3 | 30% or over) are found in Denmark, Hungary and Wales. Fewer
94 II, 9. 2. 4 | girls is especially high in Denmark, the Netherlands and the
95 II, 9. 2. 4 | last 12 months peaks in Denmark (WHO/HSBC, 2004; www rg
96 II, 9. 2. 7 | Currie et al. WHO Copenhagen, Denmark~ ~WHO (1999) Regional Office
97 II, 9. 2. 7 | populations. WHO, Copenhagen, Denmark~ ~WHO (2005c): Fact sheet
98 II, 9. 3. 1 | Member States, those of Denmark, Greece, the Netherlands
99 II, 9. 3. 2 | For a few countries - Denmark, Iceland, Finland, the Netherlands,
100 II, 9. 3. 2 | up to 3-4% of newborns in Denmark and Slovenia were born after
101 II, 9. 3. 2 | primiparous women at low risk in Denmark: population based study.
102 II, 9. 3. 3 | reported comparisons from Denmark (Kangas et al, 2004), France (
103 II, 9. 3. 3 | undertaken in European countries. Denmark, Ireland, and Norway did
104 II, 9. 3. 3 | Nikula et al, 2007).~ ~In Denmark, the use of identical questionnaires
105 II, 9. 3. 3 | European countries (Austria, Denmark, France, Germany, Great
106 II, 9. 4. 3 | specific death rates between Denmark and Portugal. Note: In the
107 II, 9. 4. 5 | health and care scheme in Denmark. Therefore, once the conceptual
108 II, 9. 5. 3 | in Luxembourg (2.7 kg), Denmark (1.7 kg) and Ireland (1.
109 II, 9. 5. 3 | followed by Sweden (2.1%) and Denmark (2.3%). At the other end
110 II, 9. 5. 4 | Ireland) while others like Denmark, Finland, Norway and Portugal
111 II, 9. 5. 4 | England and Norway). In Denmark, a number of initiatives
112 II, 9. 5. 4 | Wales, Scotland, Ireland, Denmark or the Declaration for the
113 III, 10. 2. 1 | tobacco epidemic - e.g. Denmark, Germany, Finland and the
114 III, 10. 2. 1 | United Kingdom, Spain and Denmark) data suggest a possible
115 III, 10. 2. 1 | similar in Sweden (82/77%), Denmark (83/74%) and Norway (86/
116 III, 10. 2. 1 | probabilistic studies in Denmark reported 60% prevalence
117 III, 10. 2. 1 | Croatia, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France,
118 III, 10. 2. 1 | physical activity, covering Denmark, Estonia, Norway and Portugal~-
119 III, 10. 2. 1 | information at: www.chprszu.cz~Denmark~The Danish national survey
120 III, 10. 2. 1 | United Kingdom, Germany, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Sweden).
121 III, 10. 2. 1(24)| Information and Statistics, 2004), Denmark (Ekholm et al, 2006), Estonia (
122 III, 10. 2. 1 | 11.6%; girls: 8.6%) and Denmark (boys: 12.5%; girls: 10.
123 III, 10. 2. 1 | de l’Obésité, 2006) and Denmark (36.4%) (Ekholm et al, 2006).
124 III, 10. 2. 1 | Kelleher et al, 2003), Denmark (0.9 and 0.7 pp/y, respectively,
125 III, 10. 2. 1 | Belgium, Great Britain, Denmark and Sweden.~ ~A sufficient
126 III, 10. 4. 2 | Fødevarinstituttet Veterinaerinstituttet~Denmark~Veterinaar-ja Toiduamet~
127 III, 10. 5. 2 | high GDP~Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany,
128 III, 10. 5. 3 | employment since 1997.~· In Denmark, Estonia, the Netherlands,
129 III, 10. 5. 3(43)| Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Italy, Portugal,
130 III, 10. 5. 3 | Slovakia (28%), the lowest in Denmark (9%) and Portugal (10%).
131 III, 10. 5. 3 | national legislation. However, Denmark, Finland and Sweden had
132 III, 10. 5. 3 | United Kingdom, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands,
133 III, 10. 6. 1 | such as Ireland, Spain, Denmark, the Netherlands and Sweden
134 III, 10. 6. 1 | Scandinavian countries (Denmark and Sweden). In all EU-countries,
135 III, 10. 6. 1 | contact daily was reported in Denmark (of the 15-year old Danish
136 III, 10. 6. 3 | percentages were recorded only in Denmark (1.9%) and in the Netherlands (
137 IV, 11. 1. 4 | waiting times problems as: Denmark, Finland, Ireland, Italy,
138 IV, 11. 1. 4 | Italy, Spain, Norway and Denmark (for number of visits) (
139 IV, 11. 1. 5 | to choose providers (e.g. Denmark and some states in the US),
140 IV, 11. 1. 5 | early evidence from the US, Denmark and New Zealand suggests
141 IV, 11. 1. 5 | in the Czech Republic, Denmark, Hungary and Italy. Clear
142 IV, 11. 1. 5 | on patient safety issues. Denmark is another country with
143 IV, 11. 1. 5 | Netherlands (from 70% to 45%) and Denmark (90% to 50%). The survey
144 IV, 11. 1. 6 | limit)~Salary.~Salary*.~Denmark~Blended payment (63% of
145 IV, 11. 1. 6 | budgets in Austria, Belgium, Denmark, England, France, Finland,
146 IV, 11. 1. 6 | in 9 European countries (Denmark, England, France, Germany,
147 IV, 11. 1. 6 | was better controlled. In Denmark, hospital activity increased,
148 IV, 11. 2. 1 | and cataract removals in Denmark, Sweden and Norway (along
149 IV, 11. 2. 1 | countries such as Austria, Denmark, Hungary, Norway, Poland
150 IV, 11. 3. 2 | total spending in Belgium, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland,
151 IV, 11. 3. 2 | available on the market (as in Denmark, Italy and Portugal), the
152 IV, 11. 3. 2 | in many other countries (Denmark, Switzerland, Sweden, the
153 IV, 11. 3. 2 | in some countries (e.g. Denmark, Finland, France, Norway,
154 IV, 11. 3. 2 | in Germany, followed by Denmark, Ireland and Italy. Eastern
155 IV, 11. 5. 1 | Croatia) or Scandiatransplant (Denmark, Sweden, Finland, and Norway).
156 IV, 11. 6. 2 | Norway, Malta, Spain, UK and Denmark. Countries with predominantly
157 IV, 11. 6. 2 | Latvia, Malta, Portugal, Denmark, Spain and the UK. Local
158 IV, 11. 6. 2 | companies and funds (in Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany,
159 IV, 11. 6. 2 | purchase any kind of PHI in Denmark, Finland, Spain or England (
160 IV, 11. 6. 3 | inequality by 50%, followed by Denmark and Germany, reducing inequalities
161 IV, 11. 6. 3 | and even progressive in Denmark, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands,
162 IV, 11. 6. 3 | followed by the UK, Sweden, and Denmark, with the most unfair in
163 IV, 11. 6. 4 | Each fund allocates~*~ ~Denmark~14 counties and the State~
164 IV, 11. 6. 4 | such as the Netherlands and Denmark, require the use of economic
165 IV, 12. 4 | Environment Agency (Copenhagen, Denmark) - Established in 1990~http eu~
166 IV, 12. 5 | compression of disability, and Denmark, the Netherlands, Sweden
167 IV, 12. 8 | Cyprus (2004)~Portugal (1986)~Denmark (1973)~Latvia (2004)~Romania (
168 IV, 12. 10 | Regional~Yes~ ~ ~COUNTRY: DENMARK~ ~ ~A) Prevention and control
169 IV, 12. 10 | policy of the Government of Denmark, 2002–2010 http ~ ~The Danish
170 IV, 12. 10 | 1. A new initiative in Denmark has been launced in January
171 IV, 12. 10 | on motivating families in Denmark with children between 1-
172 IV, 12. 10 | during 2007 and 2008. In Denmark municipalities have the
173 IV, 12. 10 | policy of the Government of Denmark, 2002–2010 http df~Poverty~ ~ ~ ~
174 IV, 12. 10 | policy of the Government of Denmark, 2002–2010 http df~Personal
175 IV, 12. 10 | policy of the Government of Denmark, 2002–2010 http df~Genomics
176 IV, 13.Acr | total health spending in Denmark and 0.6% in Italy, to 4.
177 IV, 13. 7. 2 | contains Sweden, Finland, Denmark and Germany. These are followed
178 Key, Ap5. 0. 0 | demographic~demography~dengue~Denmark~dentist~dentistry~dentists~
|
|
| |
