Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 -, 1 | Health gap”;~b) in 1996, “The State of Health in the European
2 -, 1 | at Community and Member State level. The adopted approach
3 I, 2. 10. 3 | treatment in another Member State. The Commission intends
4 I, 2. 11 | Population Fund (UNFPA) (2007): State of the world population
5 I, 3. 1 | millennium, no EU Member State has a TFR above 2.0. This
6 I, 3. 2 | Population size per Member State in 1975, 2006 and forecasts
7 II, 5. 4. 6 | definition of high risk state in the case of diabetes
8 II, 5. 4. 7 | country (typically a smaller State e.g. Malta, Cyprus etc),
9 II, 5. 5.Int(8) | European Commission (2004): The State of Mental Health in the
10 II, 5. 5. 1 | trends.~o The Report of the State of Mental Health in the
11 II, 5. 5. 2 | Romania), there is very little state support for people with
12 II, 5. 5. 2 | 2006a): Who cares? The state of dementia care in Europe.
13 II, 5. 5. 3 | gaps.~Treatment options~The state of the art of the treatment
14 II, 5. 5. 3 | intervention measures.~Prodromal state and prevention~People even
15 II, 5. 5. 3 | in an initial prodromal state are already suffering from
16 II, 5. 5. 3 | according to the therapeutic state of the art, this factor
17 II, 5. 5. 3 | service usage per Member State in ASD as the case identification
18 II, 5. 5. 3 | achieve better results than state agencies (Anonymous, 2003).
19 II, 5. 5. 3 | present in any EU member state, have a fundamental role
20 II, 5. 5. 3 | present in any EU Member State, have a fundamental role
21 II, 5. 10. 7 | across Europe: a EuroPrevall state of the art paper. Allergy
22 II, 5. 14. 2 | sources used to proceed to a state analysis of trends. A critical
23 II, 5. 14. 3 | remarkable fact is that the state of dental health among European
24 II, 5. 15. 4 | therapy products.~ ~At Member State level, several countries
25 II, 7. 2. 6 | data from selected Member State hospitals. This data is
26 II, 7. 4 | times greater in the Member State with the highest injury
27 II, 8. 1. 1 | not equated with a disease state, but people with intellectual
28 II, 9. 2. 1 | for report by each Member State to the WHO Regional Committee (
29 II, 9. 2. 2 | in 2000 a Report on the State of Young People’s Health
30 II, 9. 2. 2 | compliance for EU Member State countries. Their Report
31 II, 9. 2. 2 | Statistics: Each EU Member State has its own statistical
32 II, 9. 2. 2 | Europe, and what is their state of health? Worryingly, neither
33 II, 9. 2. 5 | toolkit, to enable each Member State to produce a national strategy
34 II, 9. 2. 5 | cross-sectoral planning. Each Member State committed itself to report
35 II, 9. 2. 7 | Commission (2000): Report on the state of young people’s health
36 II, 9. 3. 1 | appears that most Member State populations have close to
37 II, 9. 3. 1 | in finance allocation at State level. There are several
38 II, 9. 3. 1 | institutes operating below State level to sign up to implementation,
39 II, 9. 3. 1 | Commission (2004a): The State of Mental Health in the
40 II, 9. 3. 1 | AK , Cash K (2003): The state of men’s health across 17
41 II, 9. 4. 3 | Portugal is the Member State with the highest male and
42 II, 9. 4. 7 | European Commission (2004): The State of Mental Health in the
43 II, 9. 4. 7 | 2003): A report on the state of men’s health across 17
44 II, 9. 4. 7 | Company Foundation (2006): The State of Ageing and Health in
45 II, 9. 5. 3 | inflexibility and rigid state pension rules if taking
46 II, 9. 5. 3 | depending on the Member State (Eurostat, 2006).~ ~Patients~ ~
47 II, 9. 5. 6 | Klinge I, Bosch M (2005): State of the Art – Transforming
48 III, 10. 2. 1 | control at EU and Member State level.~Within the Treaties
49 III, 10. 2. 1 | policy at EU and Member State levels. The number of cigarettes
50 III, 10. 2. 1 | not reaching a deficiency state. Studies suggest that low
51 III, 10. 2. 1 | physical activity of the EU Member State populations depend on individual
52 III, 10. 3. 1 | recently concluded the current state of knowledge concerning
53 III, 10. 3. 1 | restaurants where 44% of employees state to be affected almost all
54 III, 10. 3. 2 | Agency (EEA) report Europe’s State of the Environment – the
55 III, 10. 3. 2 | links (htt /) to member state competent authorities, other
56 III, 10. 3. 2 | collected in 2002 in the German state of North Rhine-Westfalia (
57 III, 10. 3. 2 | Agency (2007): Europe’s State of the Environment – the
58 III, 10. 3. 4 | affected, declaration of a state of emergency or call for
59 III, 10. 3. 4 | most severely affected. A state of emergency was declared
60 III, 10. 3. 4 | flood-affected areas. The State Agency for Civil Protection
61 III, 10. 3. 4 | regard to flooding, we can state that the situation in European
62 III, 10. 4. 1 | ammonia, for each member State. A proposal for a revised
63 III, 10. 4. 2 | identified and the Member State detecting the problem has
64 III, 10. 4. 2 | situation in each Member State:~ ~• viral zoonoses: calicivirus,
65 III, 10. 4. 2 | with the relevant Member State authorities, a plan to integrate
66 III, 10. 4. 2 | unaffected region of a Member State. All members need to be
67 III, 10. 4. 2 | affecting more than one Member State, maps showing the location
68 III, 10. 4. 2 | the competent EU Member State has already adopted relevant
69 III, 10. 4. 2(34)| the pathogen. Every Member State will have to work towards
70 III, 10. 4. 2 | and marketed in one Member State can be raised by another
71 III, 10. 4. 2 | raised by another Member State in the absence of rules
72 III, 10. 4. 2 | toxicology, with respect to the state of knowledge and research
73 III, 10. 4. 2 | by the Evaluating Member State (EMS in not necessarily
74 III, 10. 4. 2 | products carried out by Member State Authorities, the applicant
75 III, 10. 4. 2 | prepared by a reporting Member State including extensive consultation
76 III, 10. 4. 2 | commercialised in at least one Member State before the entry into force
77 III, 10. 4. 2 | proceedings against a Member State or, in the case of a third
78 III, 10. 4. 3 | Environment Agency and the State of the Environment in Europe
79 III, 10. 4. 3 | The European Environment. State and outlook 2005 (SOER 2005).
80 III, 10. 4. 5 | Environment Agency and the State of the Environment in Europe
81 III, 10. 4. 5 | The European Environment. State and outlook 2005 (SOER 2005).
82 III, 10. 4. 5 | Agency (2007b): Europe’s State of the Environment – the
83 III, 10. 4. 5 | 1):101-112~ ~MNR (2004) State of Environment in Northwest
84 III, 10. 5. 2 | some of the new EU members state. Due to these limitations,
85 III, 10. 5. 2 | Lopez-Abuin et al. (2005) state that in rural areas there
86 III, 10. 5. 2 | UK indicated that mental state of mind is worse in urban
87 III, 10. 5. 3 | where 44% of employees state to be affected almost all
88 III, 10. 6. 2 | that reviewed the current state of health inequalities and
89 IV, 11. 1. 6 | funds though with heavy state regulation (see Section
90 IV, 11. 6. 1 | belief that the welfare state was in crisis. Yet these
91 IV, 11. 6. 2 | otherwise be available from the state, and is available in Germany
92 IV, 11. 6. 2 | not fully covered by the state, including cover for co-payments
93 IV, 11. 6. 2 | partly subsidised by the state using tax credits or tax
94 IV, 11. 6. 4 | health-related needs~ ~Croatia~State treasury~State treasury~ ~ ~
95 IV, 11. 6. 4 | Croatia~State treasury~State treasury~ ~ ~Cyprus~Ministry
96 IV, 11. 6. 4 | Denmark~14 counties and the State~Each county allocates. State
97 IV, 11. 6. 4 | State~Each county allocates. State allocates to counties.~14
98 IV, 11. 6. 4 | primary care: Age~Finland~State, municipalities, and National
99 IV, 11. 6. 4 | municipality allocates. State allocates to municipalities.
100 IV, 11. 6. 4 | historical spend)~Latvia~State~SCHIA allocates funds to
101 IV, 11. 6. 4 | age structure~Lithuania~State Social Insurance Council~
102 IV, 11. 6. 4 | Social Insurance Council~State Sickness Fund~ ~ ~Luxembourg~
103 IV, 11. 6. 4 | reasonable by the Secretary of State for Health (Schreyögg et
104 IV, 11. 6. 4 | Service Act, the Secretary of State for Health has a duty to
105 IV, 11. 6. 5 | Taxation for the Enabling State. CASE Discussion Paper No.
106 IV, 11. 6. 5 | practice' in health care? State of the art and perspectives
107 IV, 12 | DEVELOPMENTS AT EU AND MEMBER STATE LEVEL~ ~
108 IV, 12. 1 | function of each Member State of the European Union and
109 IV, 12. 1 | remains mainly a Member State competence.~ ~Table 12.1.
110 IV, 12. 1 | shall not prevent any Member State from maintaining or introducing
111 IV, 12. 1 | Co-ordinating in another Member State,~social security for with
112 IV, 12. 1 | received in another Member State, with or without prior~authorisation,
113 IV, 12. 2 | a disease or a high risk state in an early stage, in order
114 IV, 12. 2 | control at EU and Member State level. Within the Treaties
115 IV, 12. 5 | necessary link to the Member State authorities and to relevant
116 IV, 12. 8 | requirements that a future member state has to meet. The enlargement
117 IV, 12. 10 | governmental and federal state institution, communal authorities,
118 IV, 12. 10 | activities at national, federal state and communal level.~At national
119 IV, 12. 10 | as well part of federal state’s tasks. National Anti-Drugs
120 IV, 12. 10 | different Federal and Federal State Ministries and Agencies.
121 IV, 12. 10 | residues by federal and federal state authorities (food-monitoring).
122 IV, 12. 10 | Federal and the Federal State Government. Federal and
123 IV, 12. 10 | Government. Federal and Federal State Agencies as well as communal
124 IV, 12. 10 | from Federal and Federal State Authorities and Non-governmental
125 IV, 12. 10 | efforts of Federal and Federal State authorities to improve information
126 IV, 12. 10 | increasingly important.~Federal State legislation related to the
127 IV, 12. 10 | integrated in the Federal State law on Public Health Services.
128 IV, 12. 10 | published by the Federal State authorities. The Federal
129 IV, 12. 10 | which is funded by the State, purchases services either
130 IV, 12. 10 | pensioners.~o The Greek State provides free medical and
131 IV, 12. 10 | programs are defined by state and are implemented at regional
132 IV, 12. 10 | problems)~Agreement between State and Regions (16.03.2006):
133 IV, 12. 10 | agreement between the central State and the regional Governments (
134 IV, 12. 10 | agreement between the central State and the regional Governments (
135 IV, 12. 10 | Substances and Medical Products~ State Program on drug Control
136 IV, 12. 10 | taxes, as well as receive state subsidies. As regards specialized
137 IV, 12. 10 | the current system. The state subsidies will continue
138 IV, 12. 10 | the law on planning and state subsidies for social and
139 IV, 12. 10 | of autonomy vis-à-vis the state. For them the domains of
140 IV, 12. 10 | High~ At national level~State monitoring~Use of pesticides~
141 IV, 12. 10 | Intermediate~ At national level~State monitoring~Food safety~High~
142 IV, 12. 10 | Monitoring of food safety – state monitoring~Physical stressors~
143 IV, 13. 1 | and that each EU Member State has a different pathway
144 IV, 13. 4 | is now up to each Member State. The European Years of Equal
145 IV, 13. 4 | is now up to each Member State. The new European Social
146 IV, 13. 6. 3 | within Europe, each Member State has its own health system
147 IV, 13. 6. 3 | circumstances, with or without state guarantees for the provision
148 IV, 13. 7. 2 | This snapshot of the state of play of innovation in
149 IV, 13. 8 | are autonomous from the State, which is essential if they
150 IV, 13. 8 | behalf of their national state. Thus they fulfil a public
