Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 I, 2. 3 | life expectancy on the age distribution of the European population.~
2 I, 2. 9 | observed northward and uphill distribution shifts of many European
3 I, 2. 9 | substantial shifts in vegetation distribution. Changes in distribution
4 I, 2. 9 | distribution. Changes in distribution and the timing of seasonal
5 I, 2. 9 | Changes in the geographic distribution of the sandfly vector are
6 I, 2. 10. 3| the means of production, distribution and exchange. It has already
7 I, 2. 10. 4| can occur anywhere in the distribution system, although predominantly
8 I, 2. 11 | Social Inclusion and Income Distribution Final Report”. Report prepared
9 I, 3. 2 | life expectancy on the age distribution of the European population.~ ~
10 II, 5. 2. 2| MONICA for risk factors distribution.~Following the recommendations
11 II, 5. 2. 3| different prevalence, age distribution and risk factors.~In addition,
12 II, 5. 2. 6| information on the magnitude and distribution of the problem for both
13 II, 5. 3. 3| estimates do not reflect the distribution of clinical stages and cannot
14 II, 5. 5. 1| population had the same age distribution as the European standardised
15 II, 5. 5. 2| may be differences in the distribution of different kinds of dementia
16 II, 5. 5. 3| all ages with a worldwide distribution. Epilepsy is a symptom complex
17 II, 5. 5. 3| genetic susceptibility and the distribution of environmental risk factors
18 II, 5. 5. 3| of reports. The different distribution of epilepsy in men and women
19 II, 5. 5. 3| explained by the different distribution of epilepsy syndromes in
20 II, 5. 5. 3| 5.2. Data sources~ ~The distribution of MS incidence and prevalence
21 II, 5. 5. 3| rates were reported.~The distribution of disability (Kurtzke,
22 II, 5. 5. 3| aggregated into PR-SP-MS. The distribution of the disease course consisted
23 II, 5. 5. 3| epidemiological patterns of MS distribution in time and space across
24 II, 5. 5. 3| details as to prevalence distribution by country, gender, age,
25 II, 5. 5. 3| gender, age, and incidence distribution by Country, where available.~ ~
26 II, 5. 5. 3| A correlation with the distribution of environmental exposure
27 II, 5. 5. 3| hypothesized.~Norway has an uneven distribution of prevalence and incidence,
28 II, 5. 5. 3| periods. The geographical distribution of MS prevalence was heterogeneous
29 II, 5. 5. 3| northeast-to-southwest gradient of MS distribution in France was shown with
30 II, 5. 5. 3| rates, indicating a focal distribution of MS in ethnic groups with
31 II, 5. 5. 3| Sardinia, insular Italy.~ ~The distribution of MS in Europe by disease
32 II, 5. 5. 3| reported prevalence-based distribution of disease course is reported
33 II, 5. 5. 3| selected EUGLOREH countries~The distribution of MS in Europe by severity~
34 II, 5. 5. 3| severity~The prevalence-based distribution of disease severity indicated
35 II, 5. 5. 3| prevalence rates, on the distribution of prevalent cases by disease
36 II, 5. 5. 3| north-to-south gradient in the distribution of MS prevalence rates across
37 II, 5. 5. 3| might play a role in such distribution, biological factors, i.e.,
38 II, 5. 5. 3| underlying the differences in MS distribution.~A general methodological
39 II, 5. 5. 3| living.~ ~Figure 5.5.3.5.1. Distribution of total cost of MS in Europe (
40 II, 5. 5. 3| each of them a score. The distribution of the scores over the functional
41 II, 5. 5. 3| prevalence of multiple sclerosis, distribution of clinical forms of the
42 II, 5. 5. 3| particular, data on the distribution of the extent of the disease
43 II, 5. 5. 3| studies (Table 5.5.3.6.3. Distribution of Parkinson’s disease cases
44 II, 5. 5. 3| classified as stage HYV. The distribution of PD severity in Europe
45 II, 5. 5. 3| 1986).~ ~Table 5.5.3.6.3. Distribution of Parkinson’s disease cases
46 II, 5. 6. 4| 5.6.11).~ ~Table 5.6.11. Distribution (in per cent) of people
47 II, 5. 6. 4| Conditions)~ ~Table 5.6.12. Distribution (in per cent) of people
48 II, 5. 6. 6| Mueller WH (1990): Body fat distribution and osteoarthritis. Am J
49 II, 5. 7. 4| affected by the age and gender distribution in the general population,
50 II, 5. 7. 7| Lin RB, Murray CJ (2004): Distribution of major health risks: findings
51 II, 5. 9. 4| significant difference in sex distribution changes between older and
52 II, 5. 9. 4| geo-climatic conditions and on the distribution of the different aeroallergens.
53 II, 5. 11. 2| research into the causes and distribution of skin diseases within
54 II, 5. 11. 3| Lambeth study found a bimodal distribution of eczema prevalence thought
55 II, 5. 11. 3| prevalence showed a bimodal distribution to the Lambeth study probably
56 II, 5. 14. 1| has further enabled the distribution of periodontitis in various
57 II, 5. 14. 2| the global frequency and distribution of dental caries are complicated
58 II, 5. 14. 3| in this regard (1%). The distribution of generalized forms was
59 II, 5. 15. 3| description and analysis~ ~The distribution of RD prevalence is skewed
60 II, 6. 3. 5| occurrence of the disease and the distribution of serotypes.~ ~Invasive
61 II, 6. 3. 5| highest rates. The age and sex distribution varied across countries,
62 II, 6. 3. 6| consequently, in the production and distribution of foods) have led to the
63 II, 6. 3. 7| disease has a worldwide distribution and in the most recent years,
64 II, 8. 1. 2| as well as the percentage distribution of certain characteristics
65 II, 9 | the extremes of the age distribution. The risk of many adverse
66 II, 9. 1. 1| plurality~C: birth weight distribution by vital status, gestational
67 II, 9. 1. 1| plurality~C: Gestational age distribution by vital status, plurality~
68 II, 9. 1. 1| congenital anomalies~R: Distribution of APGAR score at 5 minutes~
69 II, 9. 1. 1| by number of fetuses~C: Distribution of maternal age~C: Distribution
70 II, 9. 1. 1| Distribution of maternal age~C: Distribution of parity~R: Percentage
71 II, 9. 1. 1| smoke during pregnancy~R: Distribution of mothers’ education~F:
72 II, 9. 1. 1| of mothers’ education~F: Distribution of mothers' country of origin~
73 II, 9. 1. 1| Health care services~C: Distribution of births by mode of delivery
74 II, 9. 1. 1| following fertility treatment~R: Distribution of timing of 1st antenatal
75 II, 9. 1. 1| of 1st antenatal visit~R: Distribution of births by mode of onset
76 II, 9. 1. 1| mode of onset of labour~R: Distribution of place of birth~R: Percentage
77 II, 9. 1. 2| the extremes of the age distribution. The risk of many adverse
78 II, 9. 3. 1| less problematic gynoid fat distribution” (WHO, 2000, p.6), and with
79 III, 10. 2. 1| 10.2.1.3.8. Trend in the distribution of new clients entering
80 III, 10. 2. 1| injecting. The exchange or distribution of syringes is in general
81 III, 10. 2. 1| facilities. The geographical distribution of needle and syringe programme
82 III, 10. 2. 1| pharmacy-based syringe exchange or distribution schemes. The overall turnover
83 III, 10. 2. 1| replaced by a more even distribution. And in some countries among
84 III, 10. 2. 1| form the most significant distribution channel, account for 47.
85 III, 10. 2. 1| can lead to changes in the distribution of BMI data, as well as
86 III, 10. 2. 1| improvements in food transport and distribution. Developments in food processing
87 III, 10. 2. 1| nutrient intake and their distribution over various well-defined
88 III, 10. 2. 1| obesity and abdominal fat distribution in Greek adults. Annals
89 III, 10. 2. 5| lead to a reduction of body distribution volume of water-soluble
90 III, 10. 2. 5| substances and to an increase of distribution volume of fat-soluble substances.
91 III, 10. 3. 4| Figure 10.3.4.1. The distribution of excess mortality during
92 III, 10. 4. 1| presents the total population distribution of annual PM10 concentrations
93 III, 10. 4. 1| the 2002-2004 period. This distribution is an approximation of the
94 III, 10. 4. 1| an approximation of the distribution of the exposure of children
95 III, 10. 4. 2| food/feed production and distribution.~ ~The food law aims at
96 III, 10. 4. 2| information”.~ ~An electronic distribution list called “OIE-Info” has
97 III, 10. 4. 2| methodology and uneven distribution of microorganisms, microbiological
98 III, 10. 4. 2| a distinct geographical distribution of cases and related risk
99 III, 10. 4. 2| production, processing and distribution stages of the food chain.~ ~
100 III, 10. 4. 2| production, processing and distribution. Member States shall also
101 III, 10. 4. 2| production, processing and distribution.~ ~On the 29th April 2004,
102 III, 10. 4. 3| and natural disasters and distribution systems have to be designed
103 III, 10. 4. 3| of micro-organisms in the distribution systems as well as to leaks
104 III, 10. 4. 3| of micro-organisms in the distribution system. Another cause is
105 III, 10. 4. 3| of contamination in the distribution network and the domestic
106 III, 10. 4. 3| network and the domestic distribution system. These objectives
107 III, 10. 4. 3| introduced through the water distribution system. Arsenic, as a contaminant
108 III, 10. 4. 5| Figure 10.4.5.2.4).~ ~The distribution of the sources of soil pollution
109 III, 10. 4. 5| proposal as well as the distribution of those effects. Understanding
110 III, 10. 4. 5| appreciation of inequity in the distribution of exposure among population
111 III, 10. 5. 2| Figure 10.5.2.1. Population distribution per settlement structure
112 III, 10. 5. 2| difference in the gender distribution, while for what concerns
113 III, 10. 5. 2| confounding factors such as age distribution are often not adequately
114 III, 10. 5. 2| Conditions (2006)~ ~ ~The distribution of reported problems clearly
115 III, 10. 5. 3| data on the differential distribution of morbidity and mortality
116 III, 10. 5. 3| groups. Among these, the distribution of costs depends very much
117 III, 10. 5. 3| the means of production, distribution and exchange. It has already
118 III, 10. 6. 2| related to occupation follow a distribution similar to those due to
119 IV, 11. 1. 1| a population or the fair distribution of the financial burden
120 IV, 11. 1. 4| efficiency, but also the distribution of financial burden across
121 IV, 11. 1. 4| across income groups and the distribution of health care use and accessibility
122 IV, 11. 1. 4| geographical factors including the distribution of services and individuals’
123 IV, 11. 1. 4| show a disproportionate distribution of utilization favouring
124 IV, 11. 1. 4| in most countries, or the distribution of GP visits is pro-poor,
125 IV, 11. 1. 6| outputs and not with the distribution of these outputs. It can
126 IV, 11. 3. 1| also their geographical distribution within the country is an
127 IV, 11. 3. 1| experience inequity in the distribution of physicians, typically
128 IV, 11. 6. 2| the whole of the income distribution in a country rather than
129 IV, 11. 6. 3| and Van Ourti, 2003). The distribution of the financial burden
130 IV, 11. 6. 4| Redistribution (or distribution) from pooling to purchasers
131 IV, 11. 6. 4| relate to equity (equal distribution of resources of funds, ensuring
132 IV, 11. 6. 5| Zandvakili S (1994): "Income distribution and redistribution through
133 IV, 12. 10 | framework covers the production, distribution and application of licensed
134 IV, 12. 10 | 1987 (Marketing, Sale and Distribution of Fuels) (Amendment) Regulations
135 IV, 12. 10 | 1987 (Marketing, Sale and Distribution of Fuels) (Amendment) Regulations
136 IV, 12. 10 | setting up of pavilions, the distribution of leaflets and small advertising
137 IV, 12. 10 | CAMS - RECYCLING is the distribution - to the citizens of the
138 IV, 12. 10 | Early abortions~Percentage distribution of performed abortions by
139 IV, 13. 7 | devices. Their collection and distribution raise many ethical issues.
