Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 I, 2. 10. 2 | inclusion and exclusion criteria for defining a substance
2 I, 2. 10. 3 | initiatives to implement quality criteria for websites.~ ~Health Telematics.
3 II, 4. 1 | 2005).~ ~One of the main criteria for the European Structural
4 II, 5. 1. 1 | measured), the diagnostic criteria adopted in risk definition (
5 II, 5. 2. 2 | measured), the diagnostic criteria adopted in risk definition (
6 II, 5. 2. 4 | and different diagnostic criteria for the definition of hypertension
7 II, 5. 2. 4 | or measured), diagnostic criteria adopted for risk factor
8 II, 5. 4. 2 | diabetes provided by WHO/ADA criteria (1998-9), is extremely variable.~
9 II, 5. 4. 4 | adoption of standardised criteria is absolutely necessary.
10 II, 5. 4. 7 | methods and standardised criteria (reports available at www. ).
11 II, 5. 4. 7 | in providing standardised criteria and integration in order
12 II, 5. 5. 1 | not fulfil the diagnostic criteria for a mental disorder either
13 II, 5. 5. 3 | systems – the divergent criteria used to identify persons
14 II, 5. 5. 3 | the validity of prediction criteria and the benefit of early
15 II, 5. 5. 3 | samples (strict exclusion criteria and study duration limited
16 II, 5. 5. 3 | the nomenclature and the criteria used to define autism have
17 II, 5. 5. 3 | screened, the diagnostic criteria used and the studied country.
18 II, 5. 5. 3 | can be due to different criteria or methods and not necessarily
19 II, 5. 5. 3 | nomenclature and the classification criteria used to define autism have
20 II, 5. 5. 3 | of different diagnostic criteria used and the inter-observer
21 II, 5. 5. 3 | prevention~ ~Diagnostic criteria~ ~There are no pathognomonic
22 II, 5. 5. 3 | diagnosis of MS. Diagnostic criteria require evidence of dissemination
23 II, 5. 5. 3 | evidence. The most widely used criteria in MS epidemiological research
24 II, 5. 5. 3 | were the Poser Committee criteria (Poser et al, 1983), consisting
25 II, 5. 5. 3 | populations, the Poser et al criteria still comprise the most
26 II, 5. 5. 3 | according to the McDonald et al criteria than to the Poser et al
27 II, 5. 5. 3 | when the Poser Committee criteria are used (McDonnell and
28 II, 5. 5. 3 | comparison of the Poser criteria and the new McDonald criteria.
29 II, 5. 5. 3 | criteria and the new McDonald criteria. Acta Neurol Scand 109:385-
30 II, 5. 5. 3 | Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis:
31 II, 5. 5. 3 | al (1983): New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis:
32 II, 5. 5. 3 | Tourtellotte WW (1976): Criteria for the clinical diagnosis
33 II, 5. 5. 3 | differences in diagnostic criteria.It has been shown (de Rijk
34 II, 5. 5. 3 | change in the diagnostic criteria may result in a decrease
35 II, 5. 5. 3 | Furthermore, standardized criteria would allow a more accurate
36 II, 5. 6. 3 | health care with OA by agreed criteria. An estimation of the incidence
37 II, 5. 6. 3 | measured using radiological criteria alone can lead to overestimates
38 II, 5. 6. 3 | Prevalence (Radiographic Criteria) in selected European Countries ~ ~
39 II, 5. 6. 3 | of arthritis by various criteria, with ACR as the preferred
40 II, 5. 6. 3 | with ACR as the preferred criteria (Arnett et al, 1988).~ ~
41 II, 5. 6. 3 | studies using the 1987 ACR criteria (European Commission (2003):
42 II, 5. 6. 3 | population study using 1987 ARA criteria and found that about two-thirds
43 II, 5. 6. 3 | concept by defining diagnostic criteria for osteoporosis on the
44 II, 5. 6. 3 | On the basis of the IOF criteria, the general prevalence
45 II, 5. 6. 6 | 1986) Development of criteria for the classification and
46 II, 5. 6. 6 | Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American
47 II, 5. 6. 6 | Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of
48 II, 5. 6. 6 | Rheumatology 1991 revised criteria for the classification of
49 II, 5. 6. 6 | World Health Organization criteria for osteopenia and osteoporosis.
50 II, 5. 6. 6 | using idfferent clinical criteria: The Chingford Study. Arthritis
51 II, 5. 8. 3 | according to a 9-4% GOLD criteria27 in persistent never smokers
52 II, 5. 8. 3 | 0% according to the GOLD criteria (Lindberg et al 2006). This
53 II, 5. 8. 3 | to different diagnostic criteria were frequently underlined:
54 II, 5. 8. 3(27)| GOLD Criteria for the Spirometric Classification
55 II, 5. 9. FB | High quality assessment criteria must be introduced, together
56 II, 5. 9. 5 | High quality assessment criteria must be introduced, together
57 II, 5. 9. 6 | importance of adopting specific criteria permitting the integration
58 II, 5. 10. 2 | have used as diagnostic criteria for FA questionnaires on
59 II, 5. 11. 3 | are limited, as diagnostic criteria suitable for epidemiological
60 II, 5. 11. 7 | Working Party’s Diagnostic Criteria for atopic dermatitis. Br
61 II, 5. 14. 2 | complicated by diagnostic criteria that differ from study to
62 II, 5. 14. 2 | analysis of the methodological criteria used published for the oral
63 II, 5. 15. 4 | medicinal products sets up the criteria for orphan designation in
64 II, 5. 15. 4 | provisions for implementing the criteria for orphan designation and
65 II, 6. 3. 6 | well as in the reporting criteria. Reporting from most countries
66 II, 6. 3. 6 | reported 11 cases; however, the criteria for reporting these cases
67 II, 6. 4. 1 | EU-wide surveillance and the criteria for their selection. The
68 II, 7. 4 | priorities. The following criteria have been used to identify
69 II, 7. 5 | the statistical quality criteria of EUROSTAT for inclusion
70 II, 8. 2. 2 | selection, based on predefined criteria, of survey of visual impairment,
71 II, 8. 2. 2 | selection, based on predefined criteria, of survey of visual impairment,
72 II, 9. 1. 1 | Countries differ in their legal criteria for birth registration and
73 II, 9. 1. 1 | registration and in their inclusion criteria for other data collection
74 II, 9. 1. 1 | criterion. The absence of common criteria distorts comparisons between
75 II, 9. 1. 1 | inclusion and exclusion criteria used by surveys and registers.
76 II, 9. 1. 1 | same inclusion/exclusion criteria.~ ~Rate in Europe~The overall
77 II, 9. 1. 1 | perinatal health in Europe: criteria, methods and results from
78 II, 9. 1. 2 | be difficult to apply the criteria precisely as there is not
79 II, 9. 1. 2 | accessed (Dolk et al, 2004). Criteria may vary over the diagnosis
80 II, 9. 3. 1 | undiagnosed conditions and the criteria used by healthcare professionals
81 II, 9. 3. 1 | the hormonal and clinical criteria that should be used to identify
82 II, 9. 3. 2 | definitions or inclusion criteria. The prevalence of “severe”
83 II, 9. 3. 2 | perinatal health in Europe: criteria, methods and results from
84 III, 10. 3. 1 | and the absence of other criteria commonly used in assessing
85 III, 10. 3. 1 | association does not meet adequate criteria for being considered causal.
86 III, 10. 3. 2 | Compounds. Environmental Health Criteria 116. Available at: htt ~ ~
87 III, 10. 3. 2 | IPCS); Environmental Health Criteria 226: Palladium. Available
88 III, 10. 3. 2 | IPCS): Environmental Health Criteria 237. Principles for evaluating
89 III, 10. 3. 4 | the world, with different criteria, formats and purpose. These
90 III, 10. 3. 4 | least one of the following criteria must be fulfilled: 10 or
91 III, 10. 4. 2 | No 178/2002 gives further criteria for when a RASFF notification
92 III, 10. 4. 2 | consider microbiological criteria, applicable at the site
93 III, 10. 4. 2 | market; microbiological criteria are tools that can be used
94 III, 10. 4. 2 | on microbiological criteria for foodstuffs, applicable
95 III, 10. 4. 2 | 2006, lays down food safety criteria for certain important food-borne
96 III, 10. 4. 2 | and assessment. A set of criteria to identify a “common mechanism
97 III, 10. 4. 2 | acceptable levels. A number of criteria for selecting groups of
98 III, 10. 4. 2 | additive response including criteria to be defined when the approach
99 III, 10. 4. 2 | health and welfare, the criteria currently used to evaluate
100 III, 10. 4. 2 | a number of operational criteria. They should have a sufficient
101 III, 10. 4. 2 | 2005 on microbiological criteria for foodstuffs. Official
102 III, 10. 4. 3 | Commission, 1998a) sets out criteria for water suitable for human
103 III, 10. 5. 3 | developed good practice criteria for a variety of organisations
104 III, 10. 5. 3 | development of good practice criteria. The Luxembourg Declaration
105 III, 10. 5. 3 | produced a set of quality criteria for good practice in WHP,
106 IV, 11. 1. 5 | addition to three general criteria: impact on health, policy
107 IV, 11. 1. 5 | guidelines are specific criteria for how and when particular
108 IV, 11. 1. 6 | representative according to some criteria (including 23 or 22% of
109 IV, 11. 5. 1 | Expanding the limits of criteria for older or other donors
110 IV, 11. 5. 3 | driven by guidelines.~The criteria for cadaver organ selection
111 IV, 11. 5. 3 | having binding selection criteria in place. For the living
112 IV, 11. 5. 3 | 13 countries have binding criteria, while other 15 have technical
113 IV, 11. 5. 3 | Figure 11.15. Risk assessment criteria in organ transplant~ ~Most
114 IV, 11. 5. 3 | evaluation of the different criteria in the risk assessment are
115 IV, 11. 5. 4 | according to predefined criteria.~The new Member States face
116 IV, 11. 5. 4 | common quality and safety criteria. This system would provide
117 IV, 11. 5. 4 | Binding safety and quality criteria should not have as a consequence
118 IV, 11. 5. 6 | 2004Trans 1~2004Recom 19 on criteria for the authorisation of
119 IV, 11. 5. 6 | Ministers to member states on criteria for the management of waiting
120 IV, 11. 6. 4 | lack of transparency in the criteria for inclusion or exclusion
121 IV, 11. 6. 5 | Methods for deriving criteria for assessing the quality
122 IV, 11. 6. 5 | et al. (2004): Shifting criteria for benefit decisions in
123 IV, 11. 6. 5 | death: a call for explicit criteria.” Quality in Health Care
124 IV, 12. 5 | conforming to a set of criteria concerning historical and
125 IV, 12. 10 | establishments (pubs) if a number of criteria have been met. Moreover
126 IV, 12. 10 | nutrition that meet the law’s criteria see www. de~National action
127 IV, 12. 10 | demonstration according to relevant criteria such us availability, interoperability,
128 IV, 12. 10 | readjusted the financial criteria for its dispensation. Nowadays
129 IV, 12. 10 | them. The act issues equal criteria for all screening programmes
130 IV, 13. 7. 3 | has been noted that the criteria for transnational cooperation
