| | 
Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 II, 5. 10.Acr| Respiratory Health Survey~EFSA~European Food safety Authority~
2 II, 5. 10. 1| reactions to food.~(Adapted from EFSA, 2004 and INFOSAN, 2006)~ ~ ~ ~
3 II, 5. 10. 1| adults and 4-6% in children (EFSA, 2004).~ ~Health consequences
4 II, 5. 10. 1| central nervous system (EFSA, 2004). As for allergies
5 II, 5. 10. 1| the age group considered (EFSA, 2004). A partial explanation
6 II, 5. 10. 2| IgE-mediated (Woods et al, 2002; EFSA, 2004). Finally, allergic
7 II, 5. 10. 2| for labelling purposes (EFSA, 2004), which is the most
8 II, 5. 10. 3| other background factors (EFSA, 2004).~Although very few
9 II, 5. 10. 5| allergenicity assessed by the EFSA for the relevant product
10 II, 5. 10. 5| European Food safety Authority (EFSA) on each request. These
11 II, 5. 10. 5| the EC and evaluated by EFSA (available at http ). As
12 II, 5. 10. 7| European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (2004): Opinion of the
13 II, 5. 10. 7| labelling purposes. The EFSA Journal 32, 1-197.~htt ~ ~
14 II, 6. 3. 6| ECDC, also the Commission, EFSA and WHO EURO are important
15 III, 10. 2. 1| European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) is developing a concise
16 III, 10. 2. 1| order to build the database, EFSA has established a European
17 III, 10. 2. 1| food consumption data to EFSA. This database is intended
18 III, 10. 2. 1| exposure assessments by the EFSA Scientific Panels and Member
19 III, 10. 2. 1| currently under development; EFSA is aiming at having a complete
20 III, 10. 2. 1| country represented in the EFSA European Network of Food
21 III, 10. 2. 1| countries represented in the EFSA European Network of Food
22 III, 10. 2. 1| Colloquium was organized by EFSA on 21 and 22 March 2006 (
23 III, 10. 2. 1| on 21 and 22 March 2006 (EFSA, 2007) on the “Development
24 III, 10. 2. 1| discussed at the above-mentioned EFSA’s scientific colloquium.
25 III, 10. 2. 1| Source: Adapted from EFSA, 2007~ ~With today’s rapid
26 III, 10. 2. 1| conclusion was reached (EFSA, 2007).~ ~There are several
27 III, 10. 2. 1| individual substance by the EFSA.~ ~The Regulation makes
28 III, 10. 2. 1| individual substance by EFSA.~ ~The nutritional substances
29 III, 10. 2. 1| European Food Sicurety Agency EFSA (2007): Development of Food-Based
30 III, 10. 2. 1| Guidelines - SUMMARY REPORT. EFSA SCIENTIFIC COLLOQUIUM, Parma,
31 III, 10. 2. 1| 22 March 2006 [http://www.efsa.europa.eu/EFSA/Scientific_
32 III, 10. 2. 1| http://www.efsa.europa.eu/EFSA/Scientific_Document/sc_colloque5_
33 III, 10. 4. 2| Cumulative Risk Assessment~EFSA~European Food Safety Authority~
34 III, 10. 4. 2| European Food Safety Agency (EFSA). Using an integrated approach
35 III, 10. 4. 2| pillars of food safety. EFSA’s evidence-based assessments
36 III, 10. 4. 2| European Food Safety Authority (EFSA).~ ~Depending on the nature
37 III, 10. 4. 2| European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)~ ~Scientific assessment
38 III, 10. 4. 2| European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) was established according
39 III, 10. 4. 2| manner to food safety crises.~EFSA acts as an independent scientific
40 III, 10. 4. 2| EU Member States. While EFSA advises on possible risks
41 III, 10. 4. 2| institutions, taking into account EFSA’s advice as well as other
42 III, 10. 4. 2| when and where required.~ ~EFSA is a Community body with
43 III, 10. 4. 2| Board.~ ~Since its creation, EFSA has established key operating
44 III, 10. 4. 2| Authority’s work. For example, EFSA undertakes to open up its
45 III, 10. 4. 2| access to all documents.~ ~EFSA’s role can be broken down
46 III, 10. 4. 2| five years of operation, EFSA has delivered more than
47 III, 10. 4. 2| influenza and Bluetongue. EFSA’s work also includes the
48 III, 10. 4. 2| from external sources.~ ~EFSA’s risk assessment operations
49 III, 10. 4. 2| produce.~ ~In addition, EFSA’s Pesticide Risk Assessment
50 III, 10. 4. 2| No 178/2002 foresees that EFSA shall search, collect, analyse
51 III, 10. 4. 2| legislation that assigns EFSA tasks related to data collection.
52 III, 10. 4. 2| Zoonoses prescribes that EFSA has to examine the data
53 III, 10. 4. 2| 396/2005 provides that EFSA has to collect and analyse
54 III, 10. 4. 2| 396/2005 foresees that the EFSA takes over from DG Sanco'
55 III, 10. 4. 2| considered. In November 2005 the EFSA Task Force on zoonoses data
56 III, 10. 4. 2| related data collection" (EFSA Journal (2005) 73: 1- 60).~ ~
57 III, 10. 4. 2| Zoonoses, Directive the EFSA is responsible for examining
58 III, 10. 4. 2| In this summary report, EFSA may also take into account
59 III, 10. 4. 2| directive 2003/99/EC.~ ~EFSA has also been requested
60 III, 10. 4. 2| database is accessible by EFSA.~ ~In order to fulfil its
61 III, 10. 4. 2| consequences~ ~Wildilife~Source: EFSA~ ~ ~Table 10.4.2.3. Disease
62 III, 10. 4. 2| European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Further information on
63 III, 10. 4. 2| Zoonoses Collaboration Centre, EFSA and ECDC jointly analysed
64 III, 10. 4. 2| zoonoses for the report (EFSA, 2006a).~ ~The main conclusions
65 III, 10. 4. 2| Summary Report in 2005 (EFSA, 2007) are:~ ~· Campylobacteriosis
66 III, 10. 4. 2| solved (Budka Hebert in EFSA 2007b).~ ~Chemical hazards~ ~
67 III, 10. 4. 2| measures~ ~ ~ATSDR, 1999; EFSA, 2004~ ~Dioxins and dioxin-like~
68 III, 10. 4. 2| EU: risk~assessment by EFSA in~preparation~ ~Intake
69 III, 10. 4. 2| had beneficial effects (EFSA, 2007b).~ ~Acrylamide~ ~
70 III, 10. 4. 2| acrylamide has been developed by EFSA (EFSA/WHO, 2006).~ ~Perfluorinated
71 III, 10. 4. 2| been developed by EFSA (EFSA/WHO, 2006).~ ~Perfluorinated
72 III, 10. 4. 2| intake of 0.13µg/kg bw (EFSA, 2006).~ ~PFOS is currently
73 III, 10. 4. 2| the Member States and the EFSA annual report on pesticide
74 III, 10. 4. 2| scarce available resources (EFSA, 2007a).~ ~Tin organic compounds~ ~
75 III, 10. 4. 2| limits can be exceeded. EFSA was asked to perform a risk
76 III, 10. 4. 2| preparation and/or cooking (EFSA, 2007b).~ ~ ~Table 10.4.
77 III, 10. 4. 2| chain, from farm to table.~ ~EFSA is also proactive in identifying
78 III, 10. 4. 2| Within this framework, EFSA has addressed a series of
79 III, 10. 4. 2| food production across the EFSA Panels and should ensure
80 III, 10. 4. 2| an operating tool within EFSA for safety assessment and
81 III, 10. 4. 2| assessment and priority setting (EFSA, 2005).~ ~Safety assessment
82 III, 10. 4. 2| genotoxic and carcinogenic~ ~The EFSA provided a summary review
83 III, 10. 4. 2| cancer dose-response data. EFSA then discussed the data
84 III, 10. 4. 2| risk management actions. (EFSA/WHO, 2006).~ ~Methodologies
85 III, 10. 4. 2| dioxin carcinogenicity. (EFSA, 2004).~ ~Principles of
86 III, 10. 4. 2| than at local level alone(EFSA, 2006c).~ ~Fitness for purpose
87 III, 10. 4. 2| developed, may be used (EFSA, 2006c).~ ~Plant protection
88 III, 10. 4. 2| of pesticides residues~ ~EFSA is possibly involved in
89 III, 10. 4. 2| consumption habits in Europe(EFSA PRIMO). To this end, consumption
90 III, 10. 4. 2| the PPR Panel (http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/science/pprippr_
91 III, 10. 4. 2| calculated, the Commission asked EFSA (the PPR Panel) for advice
92 III, 10. 4. 2| Definition of the role of EFSA in the MRLs setting procedure~ ~
93 III, 10. 4. 2| number of substances).~ ~EFSA tasks under Regulation 396/
94 III, 10. 4. 2| Regulation 396/2005 include:~· EFSA to provide risk assessment
95 III, 10. 4. 2| Within the framework of the EFSA peer review for the risk
96 III, 10. 4. 2| assessment report (DAR)~· second: EFSA (PRAPeR) peer reviews the
97 III, 10. 4. 2| applicant(s) and public EFSA conclusion; and~· third:
98 III, 10. 4. 2| of the risk assessment by EFSA. This cornerstone of the
99 III, 10. 4. 2| complications regarding the tasks EFSA has relating to MRLs.~ ~
100 III, 10. 4. 2| the PPR Panel (Art 22.6 of EFSA Regulation 178/2000):~·
101 III, 10. 4. 2| the European Commission, EFSA’s PRAPeR unit (self-tasking),
102 III, 10. 4. 2| Directive (91/414/EEC). EFSA was asked by the Commission
103 III, 10. 4. 2| responsibility passed on to EFSA and the PPR Panel started
104 III, 10. 4. 2| the Panel in early 2008.~ ~EFSA organises scientific colloquia
105 III, 10. 4. 2| States, other bodies and EFSA will be needed to establish
106 III, 10. 4. 2| document, endorsed by the EFSA’s Scientific Committee to
107 III, 10. 4. 2| developments in risk assessment, EFSA has also undertaken a process
108 III, 10. 4. 2| subject was organized by EFSA. There was general consensus
109 III, 10. 4. 2| may be more appropriate. (EFSA, 2006 b)~ ~Emerging risk~ ~
110 III, 10. 4. 2| identification is being worked out by EFSA and in European Commission,
111 III, 10. 4. 2| of interest, not only of EFSA, but also of other European
112 III, 10. 4. 2| second major component of EFSA’s mandate is risk communication
113 III, 10. 4. 2| and transparent manner, EFSA contributes to improving
114 III, 10. 4. 2| the way risk is assessed. EFSA uses a variety of communication
115 III, 10. 4. 2| releases and news alerts.~ ~EFSA raises awareness of food
116 III, 10. 4. 2| off-line communication tools.~ ~EFSA coordinates with and takes
117 III, 10. 4. 2| States and Norway (Source: EFSA, data for Norway communicated
118 III, 10. 4. 2| Liechtenstein” Report 2002~ ~EFSA (2006a): The Community summary
119 III, 10. 4. 2| the European Union. The EFSA Journal, 94, 2-228.~ ~EFSA (
120 III, 10. 4. 2| EFSA Journal, 94, 2-228.~ ~EFSA (2004): Summa Report of
121 III, 10. 4. 2| 2004): Summa Report of EFSA Scientific Colluquium on “
122 III, 10. 4. 2| 130. ISBN 29-9199-000-0~ ~EFSA (2006b): Summary Report
123 III, 10. 4. 2| 2006b): Summary Report of EFSA Scientific colloquium on “
124 III, 10. 4. 2| 13-14 July 2006. 155.~ ~EFSA (2007a): Summary Report
125 III, 10. 4. 2| ISBN: 978-92-9199-064-1~ ~EFSA (2006c): Summary Report
126 III, 10. 4. 2| ISBN: 92-9199-030-2.~ ~EFSA (2005): Summary Report of
127 III, 10. 4. 2| 142. ISBN: 92-9199-012-4~ ~EFSA (2007b): From safe food
128 III, 10. 4. 2| 20-21 November 2007.~ ~EFSA/WHO(2006): International
129 IV, 12. 4 | making agents and the public.~EFSA~ ~European Food Safety Authority (
|
|
| |
