Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 I, 2. 10. 1| of high-throughput data collection and due to the need for
2 II, 5. 1. 1| methodology adopted for data collection (self reported or measured),
3 II, 5. 2. 2| methodology adopted for data collection (self reported or measured),
4 II, 5. 2. 3| Europe adopt different data collection procedures cover different
5 II, 5. 2. 4| Due to differences in data collection methodology (self reported
6 II, 5. 3. 2| registration guidelines, collection of data on defined indicators,
7 II, 5. 4. 2| EU Member States for the collection of data on chronic diseases
8 II, 5. 4. 2| solution to the problem of data collection to fulfil precise epidemiological
9 II, 5. 4. 2| budgeting. In the UK, data collection on a range of indicators (
10 II, 5. 4. 4| framework for the future collection of complete data.~It has
11 II, 5. 4. 6| considered as feasible for collection at national basis (de Beaufort
12 II, 5. 4. 6| Recommendations~To Member States:~ ~· Collection, registration, monitoring
13 II, 5. 4. 7| responsibility for the automatic collection of standardised information
14 II, 5. 4. 7| automated standardized data collection by developing a collaboration
15 II, 5. 4. 8| GroupOECD (2006), 2006 Data Collection Update Report, Health Care
16 II, 5. 5. 3| are collected. The data collection starts from county level;
17 II, 5. 5. 3| of a more consistent data collection and documentation.~Figure
18 II, 5. 5. 3| Health, published in 2001 – Collection of data on the mental health
19 II, 5. 5. 3| European Member States: a collection of country stories (European
20 II, 5. 5. 3| European Member States: a collection of country stories (2nd
21 II, 5. 5. 3| Considering the ongoing collection of ASD data, several of
22 II, 5. 5. 3| used to standardize the collection process of cerebral palsy (
23 II, 5. 5. 3| 2007, a biobank unit for collection of biological samples (DNA
24 II, 5. 5. 3| create a standardised data collection and management system of
25 II, 5. 5. 3| Registry. History, data collection and validity. Dan Med Bull
26 II, 5. 7. 5| to give assistance in the collection of clinical performance
27 II, 5. 7. 6| national benchmarking and the collection of new epidemiological knowledge.
28 II, 5. 9. 2| standardized the methods for data collection on asthma. The first one
29 II, 5. 9. 2| telephone interviews for data collection and including patients from
30 II, 5. 14. 2| have established a data collection system at the national level:
31 II, 6. 3. 2| the latter requires the collection of risk factors and the
32 II, 6. 3. 3| is a need to improve data collection for STI, e.g. through screening
33 II, 6. 3. 3| inhibited by differences in data collection. Screening studies in Europe
34 II, 6. 4. 5| in place and improve the collection of data on consumption of
35 II, 7. 2. 1| procedures). Procedures for the collection of COD data are relatively
36 II, 7. 5 | all stakeholders.~· Data collection and reporting: While the
37 II, 7. 5 | approaches to injury data collection (Holder et al, 2004). Through
38 II, 7. 5 | for coding, sampling, data collection, data provision and calculation
39 II, 8. 1. 2| carried out the first data collection in 2004. This survey covers
40 II, 8. 1. 5| like statistics and data collection4. All these fields have
41 II, 9. 1. 1| criteria for other data collection systems. For example, in
42 II, 9. 2. 2| different data definitions and collection methods may be used in different
43 II, 9. 2. 2| to harmonise information collection within the EU, and are at
44 II, 9. 2. 2| Issues related to data collection on children~ ~Defining and
45 II, 9. 2. 5| EU focus has been on data collection, health promotion and education.~ ~
46 II, 9. 2. 6| change, whilst the enhanced collection of comparative data on children,
47 II, 9. 3. 1| reporting and improving the collection and collation of data across
48 II, 9. 3. 1| involved in overhauling data collection methods to a European standard
49 II, 9. 3. 1| systems of research and data collection, in planning, agenda setting
50 II, 9. 3. 3| diminishing between men and women. Collection of empirical evidence is
51 II, 9. 5. 2| 2004). Exemplars of data collection which reflect inequalities
52 II, 9. 5. 4| conceptual frameworks for data collection;~· The expansion and standardisation
53 II, 9. 5. 4| comprehensive methods of collection that provide comparable
54 II, 9. 5. 4| culturally appropriate for the collection of data from women in their
55 II, 9. 5. 4| Member States’ national data collection practices in the interests
56 II, 9. 5. 4| monitoring to be supported by the collection, compilation and dissemination
57 III, 10. 2. 1| definitions, methods of data collection, stratification variables,
58 III, 10. 2. 1| methodological information on data collection. Eurostat uses data from
59 III, 10. 2. 1| replace the ECHP, such as data collection from survey modules of the
60 III, 10. 2. 1| important development of data collection in this field has allowed
61 III, 10. 2. 1| different methods for data collection (e.g. self-administered
62 III, 10. 2. 1| multisectoral cooperation.~ ~A collection has been published by WHO
63 III, 10. 2. 1| comparable regarding data collection methodology and age range
64 III, 10. 2. 1| their use of different data collection methods, response rates,
65 III, 10. 2. 1| rates, age ranges, years of collection and definitions of overweight
66 III, 10. 2. 1| requirements with regard to the collection of food consumption data
67 III, 10. 2. 1| responsible for coordinating the collection, formatting and transfer
68 III, 10. 2. 1| diets and are more than a collection of nutrients.~· Food processing
69 III, 10. 2. 1| and Fisheries. Pocketbooks Collection.~ ~Gurr, M. (1998). Healthy
70 III, 10. 2. 4| genetics and genomics in data collection has dramatically changed
71 III, 10. 2. 5| women smoking”, but data collection has not been implemented.
72 III, 10. 3. 4| and concrete to allow easy collection of these data by field assessment
73 III, 10. 3. 4| Standard procedures for the collection and reporting of these data
74 III, 10. 4. 2| coordination between existing data collection and information systems
75 III, 10. 4. 2| EFSA tasks related to data collection. Specifically,~ ~• Directive
76 III, 10. 4. 2| system for the monitoring and collection of information on zoonoses
77 III, 10. 4. 2| Task Force on zoonoses data collection issued its recommendations
78 III, 10. 4. 2| harmonize the related data collection" (EFSA Journal (2005) 73:
79 III, 10. 4. 2| change the structure for data collection. A database compatible with
80 III, 10. 4. 2| TOFMS) will enable the collection of all screening data from
81 III, 10. 4. 5| investigation, monitoring and data collection, and are expected to continue
82 III, 10. 4. 5| investigation, monitoring and data collection. This trend is expected
83 III, 10. 5. 3| Online Database. This data collection covers all accidents at
84 III, 10. 5. 3| occurring at work. The data collection was set up in the context
85 III, 10. 5. 3| bodies responsible for the collection of data on accidents at
86 III, 10. 6. 1| networks represent both a collection of ties between people and
87 III, 10. 6. 1| participated in the second data collection wave in 2006-7.~ ~
88 IV, 11. 1. 3| varying in terms of revenue collection, pooling mechanisms and
89 IV, 11. 1. 5| mechanisms such as data collection systems or internal quality
90 IV, 11. 1. 5| impose data and documentation collection efforts on German hospitals
91 IV, 11. 1. 5| and the difficulty of data collection. Perhaps as a result of
92 IV, 11. 1. 6| management, regulation, collection of funds and handling of
93 IV, 11. 1. 6| reforms, the separation of the collection of health insurance premiums
94 IV, 11. 1. 6| insurance premiums from the collection of general taxes has likely
95 IV, 11. 6. 1| methods and accuracy of data collection, variable definitions and
96 IV, 11. 6. 2| of three main functions: collection of funds, pooling funds
97 IV, 11. 6. 2| arise from local taxation or collection of resources by individual
98 IV, 11. 6. 2| independent system of revenue collection is at arm’s length from
99 IV, 11. 6. 2| non-employed population.~ ~Collection agents vary across social
100 IV, 11. 6. 3| progressiveness of revenue collection and the incidence of public
101 IV, 11. 6. 3| of national and local tax collection. National taxation has been
102 IV, 11. 6. 4| There are cases where the collection and pooling of resources
103 IV, 11. 6. 4| where there are multiple collection agents as in some countries
104 IV, 11. 6. 4| some cases, the revenue collection agents are also the purchasers (
105 IV, 11. 6. 4| with pooling and resource collection, e.g. local health authorities
106 IV, 11. 6. 4| al 2007).~ ~Table 11.14. Collection and allocation of funds,
107 IV, 11. 6. 4| allocation schemes~ ~ ~ ~ ~Collection agent~Allocation agent~Purchaser~
108 IV, 11. 6. 4| Research and Indicators Collection (EUPHORIC) is a multidisciplinary
109 IV, 12. 1 | covering the fields of data collection, public information, education,
110 IV, 12. 3 | Commission intends to expand data collection and enhance capacity on
111 IV, 12. 4 | COM(2004)416~EUROSTAT~Data collection in field of health and safety~
112 IV, 12. 5 | system with mechanisms for collection of comparable data and information,
113 IV, 12. 5 | technical platform for the collection, analysis and dissemination
114 IV, 12. 5 | their definition, their collection and use (see Annex 12.1).~ ~ ~
115 IV, 12. 5 | development of indicators, collection of data and information,
116 IV, 12. 5 | health indicators and data collection. Reports will be published
117 IV, 12. 9 | Development (OECD) for the collection of data on health care.
118 IV, 12. 10 | Cooperation) and relates to the collection, transfer, reuse and recovery
119 IV, 13. 7 | of medical devices. Their collection and distribution raise many
120 IV, 13. 7. 5| each data subject for the collection of registered data. For
