Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 I, 2. 9 | cyanobacteria in phytoplankton communities, resulting in increased
2 II, 4. 1 | Commission of the European Communities, 2005).~ ~However, the significant
3 II, 4. 3 | Commission of the European Communities (2005): 2005 Commission
4 II, 5. 4. 1 | common among the poorest communities: deprivation, lack of sanitation,
5 II, 5. 5. 1 | 2004). Luxembourg: European Communities and STAKES, 2004.~ ~European
6 II, 5. 5. 1 | against depression. European Communities, 2004. Also available online
7 II, 5. 5. 3 | old children in the six communities studied. The 2002 study
8 II, 5. 5. 3 | in 150 children in these communities. This is consistent with
9 II, 5. 5. 3 | published studies, with some communities having an estimate higher
10 II, 5. 6. 3 | varies considerably between communities and may influence the epidemiology
11 II, 5. 7.Acr | Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities~CKD~Chronic Kidney Disease~
12 II, 5. 7. 3 | Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study in the USA,
13 II, 5. 7. 6 | challenges individuals, communities, and professionals to take
14 II, 5. 11. 4 | chronic diseases when entire communities are considered. Various
15 II, 5. 13 | Commission of the European Communities, 2005; WHO, 2000). A body
16 II, 5. 13 | Commission of the European Communities, 2005). In 2002, the total
17 II, 5. 14. 2 | health surveys or in specific communities including sample registration
18 II, 5. 14. 7 | ageing people, deprived communities are not only less likely
19 II, 7. 4. 7 | is more prevalent in some communities than in others. Violence
20 II, 9. 2. 7 | Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg~ ~European Commission (
21 II, 9. 3. 1 | visible in the most affected communities, particularly among blood
22 II, 9. 3. 1 | Publications of the European Communities.~ ~Falzon D and Belghiti
23 II, 9. 3. 1 | European Union. European Communities & WHO July 2002~ ~WHO/GENACIS (
24 II, 9. 3. 3 | HIV/AIDS in Europe’s migrant communities, and ethnic minorities.
25 II, 9. 5. 6 | Publications of the European Communities. Available at: htt 3 (accessed
26 II, 9. 5. 6 | Publications for the European Communities. Luxembourg~ ~European Commission (
27 III, 10. 2. 1 | due to smoking (European Communities, 2002).~Mortality due to
28 III, 10. 2. 1 | and social effects on all communities worldwide. Fluoride reduces
29 III, 10. 2. 1 | support of oral health. Communities and countries with inappropriate
30 III, 10. 2. 1 | health surveys or in specific communities including sample registration
31 III, 10. 2. 1 | services in countries and communities and how people care for
32 III, 10. 2. 1 | advantaged and disadvantaged communities. Fluoride school based programmes
33 III, 10. 2. 1 | promotes the well-being of communities, especially in urban settings,
34 III, 10. 2. 1 | shaping environments and communities, such as transport, environment,
35 III, 10. 2. 1 | Commission of the European Communities (COM(2005) 637 final.~[ht ~ ~
36 III, 10. 2. 1 | Commission of the European Communities. [ht ~ ~European Commission (
37 III, 10. 2. 1 | Commission of the European Communities, 2005; WHO, 2000). A body
38 III, 10. 2. 1 | Commission of the European Communities, 2005). In 2002, the total
39 III, 10. 2. 1 | Statistical Office of the European Communities, 2005a; Statistical Office
40 III, 10. 2. 1 | Statistical Office of the European Communities, 2005b; Statistical Office
41 III, 10. 2. 1 | Statistical Office of the European Communities, 2005c; Statistical Office
42 III, 10. 2. 1 | Statistical Office of the European Communities, 2005d; Statistics Austria,
43 III, 10. 2. 1(24)| Statistical Office of the European Communities, 2005d), Cyprus (Statistical
44 III, 10. 2. 1(24)| Statistical Office of the European Communities, 2005c), Czech Republic (
45 III, 10. 2. 1(24)| Statistical Office of the European Communities, 2005a), Slovakia (Statistical
46 III, 10. 2. 1(24)| Statistical Office of the European Communities, 2005b), Slovenia (Zaletel-Kragelj
47 III, 10. 2. 1 | Statistical Office of the European Communities, 2005a) and Estonia (45.
48 III, 10. 2. 1 | Commission of the European Communities, 2005; National Institute
49 III, 10. 2. 1 | shaping environments and communities, such as food industry,
50 III, 10. 2. 1 | Commission of the European Communities, 2007), monitoring and evaluation
51 III, 10. 2. 1 | Commission of the European Communities, 2007).~ ~In September 2007,
52 III, 10. 2. 1 | Commission of the European Communities, 2007).~ ~Action key areas
53 III, 10. 2. 1 | Commission of the European Communities (COM(2005): 637 final.~[ht ~ ~
54 III, 10. 2. 1 | Commission of the European Communities. [ht ] (report online, accessed
55 III, 10. 2. 1 | Statistical Office of the European Communities (2005a): Health status indicators
56 III, 10. 2. 1 | Statistical Office of the European Communities. [database online, accessed
57 III, 10. 2. 1 | Statistical Office of the European Communities (2005b): Health status indicators
58 III, 10. 2. 1 | Statistical Office of the European Communities. [database online, accessed
59 III, 10. 2. 1 | Statistical Office of the European Communities (2005c): Health status indicators
60 III, 10. 2. 1 | Statistical Office of the European Communities. [database online, accessed
61 III, 10. 2. 1 | Statistical Office of the European Communities (2005d): Health status indicators
62 III, 10. 2. 1 | Statistical Office of the European Communities.~[database online, accessed
63 III, 10. 2. 1 | Commission of the European Communities, Directorate General, 1993~ ~
64 III, 10. 3. 2 | Statistical Office of the European Communities~GDP~Gross Domestic Product~
65 III, 10. 3. 4 | terms of the ability of communities and individuals to cope
66 III, 10. 3. 4 | flooding, the vulnerability of communities is closely related to the
67 III, 10. 4. 1 | Statistical Office of the European Communities~ExternE~Externalities of
68 III, 10. 4. 2(38)| Commission of the European Communities: Monitoring of Pesticide
69 III, 10. 4. 2(40)| Commission f the European Communities:Monitoring of Pesticides
70 III, 10. 4. 2 | Journal of the European Communities No. L 31/1, 1 February2002.
71 III, 10. 4. 2 | Journal of the European Communities No. L 338, 22 December 2005.
72 III, 10. 4. 2 | Journal of the European Communities No. L 043, 14 February 1997.
73 III, 10. 4. 2 | Council of the European Communities of 23 April 1990 on the
74 III, 10. 4. 2 | Journal of the European Communities No. L 117, 8 May 1990. Available
75 III, 10. 4. 2 | Journal of the European Communities No. L 106 , 17 April 2001.
76 III, 10. 4. 2 | Journal of the European Communities No. L 268/1, 18 October
77 III, 10. 4. 2 | Journal of the European Communities No. L 287/1, 5 November
78 III, 10. 4. 2 | Journal of the European Communities No. L 268/24, 18 October
79 III, 10. 4. 2 | Journal of the European Communities No. L 109, 6 May 2000. Available
80 III, 10. 4. 2 | Journal of the European Communities No. L 12/3, 18 January 2007
81 III, 10. 4. 2 | Journal of the European Communities No. L 404/26, 30 December
82 III, 10. 4. 2 | Journal of the European Communities No. L 183/51, 12 July 2002.
83 III, 10. 4. 2 | Journal of the European Communities No. L 52/19, 22 February
84 III, 10. 4. 2 | Journal of the European Communities No. L 83/14, 22 March 2006.~
85 III, 10. 4. 2 | Journal of the European Communities No. L 165, 30 April 2004.
86 III, 10. 4. 2 | Journal of the European Communities No. L 395, 30 December 1989.~ ~
87 III, 10. 4. 2 | Journal of the European Communities No. L 24, 30 January 1998,
88 III, 10. 4. 2 | Journal of the European Communities No. L 139, 30 April 2004.~ ~
89 III, 10. 4. 2 | Journal of the European Communities No. L 139, 30 April 2004.~ ~
90 III, 10. 4. 2 | Journal of the European Communities No. L 332, 30 December 1995.~ ~
91 III, 10. 4. 5 | Statistical Office of the European Communities~HIA~Health impact assessment~
92 III, 10. 4. 5 | emissions to the nearby communities. As to the possible impact
93 III, 10. 4. 5 | relevant for the health of communities. Consideration of all relevant
94 III, 10. 4. 5 | still affect some local communities, support regulation and
95 III, 10. 5. 1 | the outbreaks occurred in communities with fewer than 500 inhabitants (
96 III, 10. 5. 1 | Journal of the European Communities, 1998, L 330(41):32 Available
97 III, 10. 5. 1 | Publications of the European Communities.~European Environment Agency (
98 III, 10. 5. 1 | Publications of the European Communities.~ ~Eurostat (various years):
99 III, 10. 5. 1 | Statistical Office of the European Communities~IDB~Injury Database~ISARE~
100 III, 10. 5. 2 | in some rather urbanized communities (Wood, 2004).~ ~Looking
101 III, 10. 5. 2 | Statistical Office of the European Communities~GDP~ Gross Domestic Product~
102 III, 10. 5. 3 | to workers' families and communities.” (WHO, 2006)~This widened
103 III, 10. 5. 3 | Commission of the European Communities: First Annual Report on
104 III, 10. 6. 2 | health inequalities within communities. All project examples have
105 III, 10. 6. 3 | social texture of affected communities. Interpersonal violence
106 III, 10. 6. 3 | is more prevalent in some communities than in others.~ ~The inadequacy
107 IV, 11. 6. 4 | Ministry of Health~7 autonomous communities~Cross-boundary flows, declining
108 IV, 11. 6. 5 | Publications of the European Communities.~ ~Balabanova D, McKee M (
109 IV, 11. 6. 5 | Commission of the European Communities.~ ~van de Ven W, Beck K
110 IV, 12. 10 | self-help organizations, communities etc.):~w – internet platform
111 IV, 12. 10 | BMI), federal states and communities as improved local infrastructure (
112 IV, 12. 10 | Regulations 2004~- European Communities (National Emissions Ceilings)
113 IV, 12. 10 | Products 2007.~- European Communities (control of emissions of
114 IV, 12. 10 | Regulations 2008~ ~ ~- European Communities (Good Agricultural Practice
