Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 -, 1. 0. 0(1)| be listed in Tables and Figures according to the official
2 I, 2. 4 | rate is calculated from figures at constant prices since
3 I, 2. 5 | recent European Commission’s figures, there are three million
4 I, 2. 5 | has increased. European figures from Eurostat show that
5 I, 3. 3 | expected in 2025. The EU27 figures are slightly less. This
6 I, 3. 3 | indicates that the NMS12 figures are significantly lower.
7 II, 4. 1 | increase was from 77 to 81. The figures are somewhat higher in the
8 II, 4. 1 | and 78 respectively. These figures indicate that the sex difference
9 II, 4. 1 | displayed, respectively, in Figures 4.1.1. and 4.1.2.~ ~Figure
10 II, 5. 3. 2 | European cancer survival figures are provided by the EUROCARE
11 II, 5. 3. 3 | according to the following figures (or set of them):~ ~ Cancer
12 II, 5. 3. 3 | survival by the end of 2008.~ ~Figures on cancer incidence, mortality
13 II, 5. 3. 5 | Maximum incidence rates (Figures 5.3.1) were estimated in
14 II, 5. 3. 5 | Maximum mortality rates (Figures 5.3.3) were estimated in
15 II, 5. 3. 5 | 100,000, Figure 5.3.4b).~Figures 5.3.2 show that incidence
16 II, 5. 3. 5 | macro-areas. On the contrary, Figures 5.3.4 show that mortality
17 II, 5. 3. 5 | levels of incidence rates (Figures 5.3.5) were estimated in
18 II, 5. 3. 5 | levels of mortality rates (Figures 5.3.7) were estimated in
19 II, 5. 3. 5 | both for men and women (Figures 5.3.5 and Figures 5.3.7).
20 II, 5. 3. 5 | women (Figures 5.3.5 and Figures 5.3.7). Stomach cancer incidence (
21 II, 5. 3. 5 | Stomach cancer incidence (Figures 6) and mortality trends (
22 II, 5. 3. 5 | 6) and mortality trends (Figures 5.3.8) are decreasing both
23 II, 5. 3. 5 | Europe (Ferlay et al, 2007). Figures 5.3.9 show that maximum
24 II, 5. 3. 5 | both for men and women (Figures 5.3.10) (65 new cases in
25 II, 5. 3. 5 | cases per 100,000 in women). Figures 5.3.11 show that Hungary,
26 II, 5. 3. 5 | incidence rates are lower.~Figures 5.3.13a and 5.3.15a show
27 II, 5. 3. 5 | macro-areas considered as shown in Figures 5.3.14a and 5.3.16a. In
28 II, 5. 3. 6 | cancer site. For this reason Figures 5.3.29 show 5-year relative
29 II, 5. 3. 6 | lowest level of prognosis (Figures 5.3.30). 5-year relative
30 II, 5. 3. 6 | cancer relative survival (Figures 5.3.31) was over than 48%
31 II, 5. 3. 6 | survival ~10% in men and women (Figures 5.3.32). Estimates of 1-
32 II, 5. 4. 3 | children that have lower figures, there does not seem to
33 II, 5. 4. 3 | EUCID 11 countries provided figures, ranging between 42% (Finland)
34 II, 5. 4. 3 | countries provided data, with figures between 0.1% (Netherlands,
35 II, 5. 4. 4 | 50% in the countries with figures available for EUCID. However,
36 II, 5. 4. 4 | increasing. However, the figures currently available are
37 II, 5. 5. 2 | Kingdom. Consequently, the figures are an underestimation of
38 II, 5. 5. 2 | studies are as follows. The figures represent an estimate of
39 II, 5. 5. 2 | this may already seem, the figures presented in this report
40 II, 5. 5. 3 | and in certain incidence figures (gender, migrants, urbanicity).
41 II, 5. 5. 3 | 2007). According to NOMESCO figures, the DDD sales of antipsychotics
42 II, 5. 5. 3 | Health in the EU – Key facts, figures and activities http df~There
43 II, 5. 5. 3 | recorded, as epidemiological figures are unreliable and inconsistent.~ ~
44 II, 5. 5. 3 | are compared. Reference figures from the entire national
45 II, 5. 6. 3 | may be obtained from the figures of the progression of radiological
46 II, 5. 6. 3 | as OA is not reversible (Figures 5.6.3 and 5.6.4 and Tables
47 II, 5. 6. 3 | reflected in recent prevalence figures for RA from the UK which
48 II, 5. 6. 3 | 0.86% and 0.51%. These figures are not directly comparable
49 II, 5. 6. 3 | unpredictable and prospective figures should be collected through
50 II, 5. 6. 3 | Osteoporosis Study, 2002). Similar figures have been found also in
51 II, 5. 6. 3 | whilst in men the comparable figures are 2.4% and 20%, respectively (
52 II, 5. 7. 3 | Figure 5.7.3), while higher figures are reported in medical
53 II, 5. 7. 5 | of their diseases. Early figures indicate that in the year
54 II, 5. 8. 2 | Health in Europe Facts & Figures, from European Lung White
55 II, 5. 8. 5 | publication includes the total figures of mortality, morbidity
56 II, 5. 9. 2 | Health in Europe Facts & Figures, from European Lung white
57 II, 5. 9. 3 | Health in Europe Facts & Figures, 2003 ERJ). The burden of
58 II, 5. 9. 5 | measures, it would be useful if figures and costs related to the
59 II, 5. 9. 7 | in Europe (2003): Facts & Figures, ERJ~ ~Mantovani L G, Bettoncelli
60 II, 5. 12. 3 | s have been reported in Figures 5.12.1 (A and B) and 5.12.
61 II, 5. 15. 2 | of RD in general. All the figures that are widely used have
62 II, 5. 15. 3 | in family members. These figures have been extracted from
63 II, 5. 15. 3 | lower than the prevalence figures typically presented in Europe.
64 II, 6. 3. 1 | report, national incidence figures thus often reflect activity
65 II, 6. 3. 1(3)| bring more clarity to actual figures for incidence, morbidity,
66 II, 6. 3. 2 | as well as low baseline figures (figure 6.1). However, two
67 II, 6. 3. 3 | tere is a general lack of figures for prevalence or incidence.
68 II, 6. 3. 4 | 6.1. Selected tables and figures from the Tuberculosis Annual
69 II, 6. 3. 5 | diseases for which surveillance figures are most reliable: it is
70 II, 7. 1 | mentioned policy documents. Figures are coming from different
71 II, 7. 2. 9 | EuroCost projects provide figures for the medical costs of
72 II, 7. 2. 9 | summarisation of injury figures is rather difficult.~ ~ ~ ~
73 II, 7. 3 | report (EuroSafe, 2008).~The figures stated in this chapter represent
74 II, 7. 3. 1 | Comprehensive View of Injuries~ ~The figures given in Table 7.1 are based
75 II, 7. 3. 2 | Based on the 2003-2005 figures for all ages, Lithuania
76 II, 7. 3. 4 | users in these absolute figures is likely to underestimate
77 II, 7. 3. 4 | comparability of the national figures are described in Chapter
78 II, 7. 3. 5 | above-mentioned mortality figures almost certainly underestimate
79 II, 7. 4. 1 | age~ ~According to these figures, actions should tackle severe
80 II, 8. 1. 3 | the poverty line. These figures compare with just under
81 II, 9 | 2005; Garite et al, 2004). Figures 9.T1.1 and 9.T1.2. present
82 II, 9. 1. 1 | using EUROSTAT data, while Figures 9.1.1.1 and 9.1.1.2 show
83 II, 9. 1. 2 | are not included in the figures). Many rare genetic disorders
84 II, 9. 1. 2 | updates each year prevalence figures on 95 subgroups of congenital
85 II, 9. 1. 2 | 2005; Garite et al, 2004). Figures 9.T1.1 and 9.T1.2. present
86 II, 9. 2. 3 | lymphoma as well as leukaemias (Figures 9.2.1a and b). Leukaemia
87 II, 9. 2. 3 | 335.000 are injured. These figures represent about 10% of all
88 II, 9. 3. 1 | lifespan, while in Greece figures for both sexes are low in
89 II, 9. 3. 1 | Cancer in Europe – Facts and Figures. January http f (Article
90 II, 9. 3. 1 | Eurostat (2007): Europe in figures: Eurostat yearbook 2006-
91 II, 9. 4. 3 | cardiac pathologies.~ ~Global figures show that the WHO European
92 III, 10. 2. 1 | sexes show similar rates.~ ~Figures 10.2.1.1.2. 10.2.1.1.3.
93 III, 10. 2. 1 | and ecstasy, the average figures are 5.1% and 5% for lifetime
94 III, 10. 2. 1 | during this period. These figures are considered a minimum
95 III, 10. 2. 1 | 2000a): EU Transport in figures. Statistical pocketbook.
96 III, 10. 2. 1 | This latter value also figures in the EURODIET guidelines
97 III, 10. 3. 2 | CEFIC (2005). Facts and Figures (as of January 2005). http://
98 III, 10. 3. 3 | medium and low baseline figures, shows that a general increase
99 III, 10. 4. 2 | Development(OECD), (2006): OECD in Figures 2006- 2007 edition~ ~The
100 III, 10. 4. 5 | hazardous. Therefore, the figures on hazardous waste are not
101 III, 10. 5. 2 | and recreational areas (Figures 10.5.2.2-10.5.2.4).~ ~Figure
102 III, 10. 5. 3 | electricity supply. Maximum figures are observed in public administration
103 III, 10. 5. 3 | general, slightly higher figures are reported by women in
104 III, 10. 5. 3 | highlighted by first, providing figures on occupational diseases
105 III, 10. 5. 3 | However, in 2003 and 2004 the figures seem to be quite stable.
106 III, 10. 5. 3 | Romania saw increasing index figures.~Work accidents occur very
107 III, 10. 5. 3 | has increased. European figures from Eurostat show that
108 IV, 11. 1. 2 | majority of the comparative figures on health expenditure, health
109 IV, 11. 1. 2 | countries and the comparative figures should be interpreted with
110 IV, 11. 5. 1 | Figure 11.10. International Figures On Organ Donation and Transplantation~ ~
111 IV, 11. 5. 3 | exportation are shown in Figures from 11.11 to 11.14.~ ~Figure
112 IV, 12. 10 | drug-related deaths~based. These figures do not include deaths~which
