| | 
Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 I, 2. 7 | city; in Europe, South-East England has the same effect. Sao
2 I, 2. 10. 4| the Healthcare system in England, both for manufactured products
3 II, 5. 2. 5| over a 20-year period in England and Wales. The authors found
4 II, 5. 2. 7| Population Risk Factor Changes in England and Wales, 1981-2000. Am
5 II, 5. 3. 6| Switzerland and Spain. Denmark and England had lower survival than
6 II, 5. 3. 6| Switzerland survival was 80%. England, Scotland, Wales, Denmark,
7 II, 5. 3. 6| Czech Republic, Denmark, England, Estonia, Malta, Poland,
8 II, 5. 4. 3| corresponding to Austria and England. The percentage decreases
9 II, 5. 4. 3| between 9%(Finland) and 41% (England), with a median of 28%,
10 II, 5. 5. 3| Russia, Slovak Republic, England, Greece, Portugal, Republic
11 II, 5. 5. 3| Sweden, The Netherlands, England, France and Denmark. Risk
12 II, 5. 5. 3| islands versus southern England and Wales; a markedly increased
13 II, 5. 5. 3| at least twice those of England and Wales and, despite methodological
14 II, 5. 6. 6| Epidemiology of fractures in England and Wales. Bone 29:517-522~
15 II, 5. 7. 3| medical databases (Ireland, England, Italy) or population surveys.
16 II, 5. 7. 3| medical databases in Ireland, England and Italy than in population
17 II, 5. 7. 3| Van Biesen et al, 2007) , England (Stevens et al, 2007), Iceland (
18 II, 5. 7. 3| medical databases (Ireland, England, Italy) or population surveys.
19 II, 5. 7. 3| medical databases in Ireland, England and Italy than in population
20 II, 5. 7. 5| monitors quality improvement in England & Wales through the UK registry,
21 II, 5. 7. 5| Renal Services. The NHS in England and also in Wales has published
22 II, 5. 9. 3| several EU countries (such as England, Italy), and elsewhere (
23 II, 5. 10. 7| systemic allergic disorders in England: analysis of national admissions
24 II, 5. 12. 2| countries, plus separately England and Wales, and Scotland.
25 II, 5. 12. 3| lowest ones were in the England and Wales (3.6/100,000),
26 II, 5. 12. 3| Ireland from 3.4 to 4.8, England and Wales from 3.6 to 8.
27 II, 5. 12. 3| men and +3% in women from England and Wales, around +9% in
28 II, 6. 3. 1| estimates. For example, in England, from GP consultations and
29 II, 8. 2. 1| supported accommodation in England, Emerson (2005) found significant
30 II, 8. 2. 1| accommodation in Northern England. Journal of Intellectual
31 II, 9 | are the Czech Republic, England, Ireland, and Lithuania.
32 II, 9. 1. 1| singleton births in the North of England, 1982-1994. Bjog 2000;107(
33 II, 9. 1. 1| mother's age and birthweight, England and Wales, 1976-2000. Health
34 II, 9. 1. 2| Austria, Belgium, Croatia, England & Wales, France, Germany).
35 II, 9. 1. 2| 1 or Type 2 diabetes in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland:
36 II, 9. 2. 3| 8% for Wales, 15.3% for England, and 14.6% in Ireland, which
37 II, 9. 2. 4| are the Czech Republic, England, Ireland, and Lithuania.
38 II, 9. 3. 1| year in men and women in England and Wales. With a greater
39 II, 9. 3. 1| success rate. Ministers in England have announced that a screening
40 II, 9. 3. 1| 65 will be implemented in England over the next five years.~ ~
41 II, 9. 3. 1| observed in some countries. England and Wales, for example,
42 II, 9. 3. 2| singleton births in the North of England, 1982-1994. Bjog 2000;107(
43 II, 9. 3. 2| mother's age and birthweight, England and Wales, 1976-2000. Health
44 II, 9. 3. 3| EU-sponsored series of surveys in England, Finland, France, Germany,
45 II, 9. 3. 3| 15% in Poland to 38% in England (Fig. 1) (Currie et al,
46 II, 9. 3. 3| 18% in Spain to 35.7% in England. Among girls, positive responses
47 II, 9. 3. 3| 2 in Poland to 40.4% in England. From a gender perspective,
48 II, 9. 3. 3| had sexual intercourse (England, Finland, Germany, Scotland,
49 II, 9. 3. 3| abortions, and births in England, 1994-2003, and the national
50 II, 9. 4. 3| gradients reported in both England & Wales and Scotland, show
51 II, 9. 4. 7| burden of the illness in England, Health Trends. vol. 25,
52 II, 9. 5. 3| providing unpaid care in England and Wales, by sex and age,
53 II, 9. 5. 3| partner~United Kingdom (England & Wales) b ( 2000 data )~·
54 II, 9. 5. 3| Council of Europe, 2002). In England and Wales in the year preceding
55 II, 9. 5. 3| costs to the victim. In England & Wales in 2004, the cost
56 II, 9. 5. 4| men’s health strategies (England and Wales, Ireland) while
57 II, 9. 5. 4| 2007), National Screening England Chlamydia (2007) and Aortic
58 II, 9. 5. 4| Gender Equality Duty (England and Norway). In Denmark,
59 II, 9. 5. 4| national policy documents in England and Wales, Scotland, Ireland,
60 II, 9. 5. 6| Intervention or Metformin. The New England Journal of Medicine Volume
61 III, 10. 2. 1| Macedonia, the United Kingdom (England, Scotland and Wales) as
62 III, 10. 2. 1| representing separately England (Department of Health, 2006;
63 III, 10. 2. 1| 1.7.4). For example, in England (UK) the numbers increased
64 III, 10. 2. 1| prevalence of overweight in England (UK) (Department of Health,
65 III, 10. 2. 1| Armstrong et al, 2003). In England (UK) obesity among children
66 III, 10. 2. 1| 2006): Health Survey for England - updating of trend tables
67 III, 10. 2. 4| for Disease Biology. New England J of Medicine, 349: 969-
68 III, 10. 4. 2| pesticide usage on farms in England and Wales started in 1965
69 III, 10. 5. 1| private water supplies in England and Wales. The main pathogen,
70 III, 10. 5. 1| drinking-water supplies in England and Wales 1970–2000. Epidemiology
71 III, 10. 5. 2| health care indicators in England identified rural patients
72 III, 10. 5. 2| future. A fair deal for rural England. The Stationary Office Limited.~ ~
73 III, 10. 5. 2| health care indicators in England. BMC Health Services Research
74 III, 10. 5. 2| local authority districts in England and Wales 1988-1992. Thorax,
75 IV, 11. 1. 6| Not relevant.~Salary.~ ~England~86% by blended payment (
76 IV, 11. 1. 6| Austria, Belgium, Denmark, England, France, Finland, Germany,
77 IV, 11. 1. 6| European countries (Denmark, England, France, Germany, Hungary,
78 IV, 11. 1. 6| countries. For instance, while England includes all hospitals to
79 IV, 11. 1. 6| resource consumption data. In England and France prices are established
80 IV, 11. 1. 6| Healthcare Federation, 2006). In England the DRG-style Health Related
81 IV, 11. 2. 2| in health can be seen in England, Sweden, and at local level
82 IV, 11. 3. 2| Italy, Portugal, Norway, England, Wales, and the Baltic States),
83 IV, 11. 4 | is a clear distinction in England between assessment (a scientific
84 IV, 11. 6. 2| Denmark, Finland, Spain or England (since 1997), and there
85 IV, 11. 6. 2| some countries such as in England where all private medical
86 IV, 11. 6. 4| as primary care trusts in England (Thomson, Foubister and
87 IV, 11. 6. 4| resource-poor regions in England is based on the risk adjustment
88 IV, 11. 6. 4| systems listed above and England (where risk adjusted capitation
89 IV, 11. 6. 4| parents (and local tax base)~England~HM Revenue and Customs (
90 IV, 11. 6. 4| benefits can be seen in England, where all services should
91 IV, 11. 6. 5| care-What is it? ." The New England Journal of Medicine 335(
92 IV, 11. 6. 5| Payment by Results in England." Euro Health 13(1): 13-
93 IV, 11. 6. 5| quality of care." The New England Journal of Medicine 335(
94 IV, 11. 6. 5| High-Quality Care." The New England Journal of Medicine 350(
95 IV, 11. 6. 5| quality of medical care”. New England Journal of Medicine 294:
96 IV, 12. 10 | with Northern Ireland and England for the delivery of some
97 Key, Ap5. 0. 0| endocrine~endometrium~energy~england~enlargement~enteritidis~
|
|
| |
