Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 I, 2.Acr | ISCED~International Standard Classification of Education~NMS~New Member
2 I, 2. 10. 2 | utmost importance for the classification (e.g. natural occurring
3 II, 5. 2.Acr | lipoprotein~ICD~International Classification of Disease~IHD~Ischemic
4 II, 5. 2. 6 | in international disease classification pose new challenges for
5 II, 5. 3.Acr | Cancer~ICD~International Classification of Diseases~LE~Life Expectancy~
6 II, 5. 3. 3 | according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD).~- Cancer
7 II, 5. 4. 2 | upon the standardized ICD classification) administered during the
8 II, 5. 4. 2 | source and the standard classification of ATC and DDDs (Defined
9 II, 5. 4. 8 | ISBN 92 4 159493 4 (NLM classification: WK 810) ISBN 978 92 4 159493
10 II, 5. 5. 3 | description in the DSMR-IV classification. People with bulimia pass
11 II, 5. 5. 3 | Foundation (2003a): DSMR-IV classification. Anorexia. Available at: htt m (
12 II, 5. 5. 3 | Foundation (2003b): DSMR-IV classification. Bulimia. Available at: htt m (
13 II, 5. 5. 3 | 3.1.8 Acronyms~ ~DSMR-IV classification~Diagnostic and Statistical
14 II, 5. 5. 3 | in times of international classification systems – the divergent
15 II, 5. 5. 3 | diagnosis according to ICD10 classification (the majority of data is
16 II, 5. 5. 3 | on different diagnostic classification levels. Data provided by
17 II, 5. 5. 3 | the nomenclature and the classification criteria used to define
18 II, 5. 5. 3 | applying the ILAE international classification categories (Commission,
19 II, 5. 5. 3 | application of the ILAE syndromic classification and the limitations of this
20 II, 5. 5. 3 | the limitations of this classification for epidemiological purposes.~ ~
21 II, 5. 5. 3 | system was used for disease classification. Patients with and without
22 II, 5. 5. 3 | 58:570-576.~Commission on Classification and Terminology of the International
23 II, 5. 5. 3 | 1989): Proposal for revised classification of epilepsies and epileptic
24 II, 5. 5. 3 | Koivikko MJ (1997): Prevalence, classification, and severity of epilepsy
25 II, 5. 5. 3 | of the epilepsy syndrome classification: a prospective study. Lancet
26 II, 5. 5. 3 | l’Epilessia (1996): ILAE classification of epilepsies:its applicability
27 II, 5. 5. 3 | Mykletun A (2000): Prevalence, classification, and severity of epilepsy
28 II, 5. 5. 3 | For this report, the age classification was chosen based on what
29 II, 5. 5. 3 | based on ICD (International Classification of Diseases) codes as they
30 II, 5. 5. 3 | comprise the most common classification in such surveys. MS is diagnosed
31 II, 5. 5. 3 | of life~ICD~International Classification of Diseases~IL~Interleukin~
32 II, 5. 6. 6 | Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis.
33 II, 5. 6. 6 | reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the
34 II, 5. 6. 6 | revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis.
35 II, 5. 6. 6 | revised criteria for the classification of global functional status
36 II, 5. 7. 1 | Table 5.7.2. Current CKD Classification Based on Severity and Therapy~ ~ ~
37 II, 5. 7. 7 | kidney disease: evaluation, classification and stratification. Am J
38 II, 5. 8. 3(27)| Criteria for the Spirometric Classification of COPD Severity:~Stage
39 II, 5. 8. 4 | for patients selection and classification. Despite that, COPD is strongly
40 II, 5. 10.Acr | Hypersensitivity~ICD~International Classification of Diseases~IgE~Immunoglobulin
41 II, 5. 10. 1 | mechanisms.~ ~Figure 5.10.1. Classification of adverse reactions to
42 II, 5. 10. 2 | the way the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) coding
43 II, 5. 10. 2 | to have been used for the classification of allergic reactions to
44 II, 5. 12.Acr | virus~ICD~International Classification of Disease~WHO~World Health
45 II, 5. 12. 2 | Revisions of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) were used (
46 II, 5. 12. 2 | cirrhosis during this period, classification of cirrhosis deaths was
47 II, 5. 12. 3 | changes may be due to the classification as deaths from cirrhosis
48 II, 5. 12. 7 | WHO) (1967) International Classification of Disease: 8th revision.
49 II, 5. 12. 7 | WHO) (1977) International Classification of Disease: 9th revision.
50 II, 5. 12. 7 | International Statistical Classification of Disease and related Health
51 II, 5. 15. 1 | disease in International classification systems, and, as a consequence,
52 II, 7.Acr | International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related
53 II, 7. 2 | based on the International Classification of Diseases and Related
54 II, 7. 2. 1 | International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related
55 II, 7. 2. 1 | 800-999)~- Supplementary Classification of external causes of injury
56 II, 7. 2. 1 | ICECI – International Classification of External Causes of Injuries~ ~
57 II, 7. 2. 1 | been developed as a related classification with respect to the ICD-10
58 II, 7. 2. 1 | belongs to the WHO family of classification systems The ICECI was the
59 II, 8. 1. 1 | underlying the WHO International Classification of Functioning Disability
60 II, 8. 2. 1 | Organisation’s International Classification of Diseases, Version 10,
61 II, 8. 2. 1 | Retardation Definition, Classification, and System of Supports (
62 II, 8. 2. 1 | Organisation (2001) International Classification of Functioning, Disability
63 II, 8. 2. 1 | 1992). The International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision.
64 II, 8. 2. 1 | ICF~WHO’s International Classification of Functioning, Disability,
65 II, 8. 2. 2 | International statistical classification of diseases, injuries and
66 II, 8. 2. 2 | mortality levels (details on the classification of countries into subregions
67 II, 8. 2. 2 | mortality levels (details on the classification of countries into subregions
68 II, 8. 2. 3 | ICF~WHO’s International Classification of Functioning, Disability,
69 II, 9. 1. 1 | Nordic-Baltic perinatal classification: geographical contrasts
70 II, 9. 2. 3 | i.e. the International Classification of Functioning, Disability
71 II, 9. 2. 7 | WHO (2002): International Classification of Functioning, Disability
72 II, 9. 3. 2 | Nordic-Baltic perinatal classification: geographical contrasts
73 III, 10. 2. 1 | a category in the ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural
74 III, 10. 2. 1 | Nutrient profiling is the classification of food according to their
75 III, 10. 2. 1 | social inequality in Europe. Classification used in paper was misleading [
76 III, 10. 2. 4 | International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related~ ~
77 III, 10. 2. 5 | consideration explains why a classification of old people only based
78 III, 10. 3. 2(25)| provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling
79 III, 10. 3. 2 | Globally harmonised system for classification and labelling (UNECE, 2003),
80 III, 10. 3. 2 | Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals.
81 III, 10. 4. 5 | sufficient' or 'poor'. The extra classification of 'sufficient' quality
82 III, 10. 4. 5 | statistics are due varying classification in the EU and EECCA countries,
83 IV, 11. 1. 6 | different systems of patient classification, there is increasing concern
84 IV, 11. 5. 5 | system of adverse event classification and reporting~ ~
85 IV, 12. 10 | products~S.I. 624 of 2001 - classification, packaging & labelling of
86 IV, 13. 8 | the UN, the definition and classification of civil society actors
