Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 I, 2. 2 | workplaces and match the efficiency and quality of market leaders –
2 I, 2. 3 | immigrants affecting the efficiency of care. This makes additional
3 I, 2. 5 | workplaces and match the efficiency and quality of market leaders –
4 I, 2. 5 | introduced from a management efficiency perspective; others with
5 I, 2. 7 | which would also increase efficiency of those trips that cannot
6 I, 2. 8 | European region, despite energy efficiency improvements and an increased
7 I, 2. 10. 1| improve nutrient/water use efficiency, resistance to biotic/abiotic
8 I, 2. 10. 4| healthcare supply chain efficiency and transparency.~ ~Medication
9 I, 2. 10. 4| crosschecked.~ ~Increasing efficiency~ ~Manual systems and processes
10 I, 2. 10. 4| standardisation would increase the efficiency throughout the supply chain
11 II, 5. 1. 2| to define care since its efficiency is the result of a whole
12 II, 5. 3. 7| compliance with the invitation, efficiency of referral for further
13 II, 7. 2. 3| European roads, evaluate the efficiency of road safety measures,
14 II, 9. 1. 2| would improve the quality or efficiency of registries: a) full coding
15 II, 9. 4. 5| deployed in the interest of efficiency and cost effectiveness and
16 II, 9. 4. 5| area of long term care. The efficiency of the service will be evaluated
17 III, 10. 3. 1| dwellings and assessment of the efficiency of the remedial actions.
18 III, 10. 4. 1| limits for industry and efficiency standards for buildings
19 III, 10. 4. 1| IPPC for major industry~· Efficiency standards for buildings
20 III, 10. 4. 3| are likely to reflect the efficiency of surveillance and reporting
21 III, 10. 4. 5| improvement of resource efficiency.~ ~Thus, the priority waste
22 III, 10. 5. 1| al (2007): Energy, energy efficiency, and the built environment.
23 III, 10. 5. 3| workplaces and match the efficiency and quality of market leaders –
24 III, 10. 5. 3| introduced from a management efficiency perspective and others with
25 IV, 11. 1. 1| patients and on technical efficiency, including provider payment
26 IV, 11. 1. 3| of health care; improve efficiency by holding providers more
27 IV, 11. 1. 3| continuous efforts for improving efficiency in central and Eastern Europe
28 IV, 11. 1. 3| persistent concerns towards efficiency and cost containment (OECD
29 IV, 11. 1. 3| the conflicts between the efficiency and cost-containment goals
30 IV, 11. 1. 3| containment and increasing efficiency, in large part by introducing
31 IV, 11. 1. 3| contain costs and improve efficiency consisted of tightening
32 IV, 11. 1. 3| of incentives to increase efficiency; and only short-term cost
33 IV, 11. 1. 3| were expected to improve efficiency largely by: a) increasing
34 IV, 11. 1. 3| particular, estimating the efficiency with which the resources
35 IV, 11. 1. 3| appropriateness of care, technical efficiency and the patient’s experience.~ ~
36 IV, 11. 1. 4| consider not just health system efficiency, but also the distribution
37 IV, 11. 1. 5| containment and efforts to improve efficiency, the recent years have seen
38 IV, 11. 1. 6| 11.1.3.4. Technical efficiency~ ~There is considerable
39 IV, 11. 1. 6| an appropriate measure of efficiency in a complex human service
40 IV, 11. 1. 6| of the main measures of efficiency as technical efficiency,
41 IV, 11. 1. 6| efficiency as technical efficiency, concerned with outputs
42 IV, 11. 1. 6| outputs. It can be argued that efficiency can be broadly ascertained
43 IV, 11. 1. 6| generate a single measure of efficiency, or productivity of the
44 IV, 11. 1. 6| Macro level studies of efficiency have been conducted with
45 IV, 11. 1. 6| and benefits of the NHS.~ ~Efficiency and provider payment methods~ ~
46 IV, 11. 1. 6| provider behaviour and the efficiency, equity and quality outcomes
47 IV, 11. 1. 6| initial cost savings and efficiency improvements. Currently,
48 IV, 11. 1. 6| constraint aimed at encouraging efficiency in production.~ ~Case-based
49 IV, 11. 1. 6| the incentive to improve efficiency. Both purposes require an
50 IV, 11. 1. 6| diagnosis groups may increase efficiency and reduce data manipulation
51 IV, 11. 1. 6| no evidence of improved efficiency or increased activity (Boyle,
52 IV, 11. 1. 6| used to infer the level of efficiency in which the healthcare
53 IV, 11. 2 | responsiveness of care, and efficiency. This section focuses on
54 IV, 11. 2. 1| lower levels of equity and efficiency (Ettelt et al, 2006).~ ~
55 IV, 11. 2. 1| aim to increase activity, efficiency and reduce waiting times;
56 IV, 11. 5. 4| donation process has increased efficiency in the procurement of organs
57 IV, 11. 5. 5| improving Organ Transplantation efficiency addressed in this action
58 IV, 11. 5. 5| living donors), improving the efficiency and equity of allocation
59 IV, 11. 6. 1| of revenue or increasing efficiency (Mossialos and Dixon, 2002).~ ~
60 IV, 11. 6. 2| system in terms of equity, efficiency, responsiveness and quality
61 IV, 11. 6. 2| providing incentives for efficiency (WHO 2006).~ ~Among some
62 IV, 11. 6. 2| implications both on equity and on efficiency. The increase in strategic
63 IV, 11. 6. 2| can compete may improve efficiency. At the same time, a single
64 IV, 11. 6. 2| providers in order to improve efficiency. All countries except Germany
65 IV, 11. 6. 2| legislation are improved efficiency, increased innovation and
66 IV, 11. 6. 2| sharing is expected to improve efficiency at a micro level while containing
67 IV, 11. 6. 2| to achieving any gains in efficiency, since individuals are not
68 IV, 11. 6. 2| status lowers allocatable efficiency (Thomson et al, 2003). A
69 IV, 11. 6. 2| undermining any potential efficiency gains (Gemmill et al 2008).~ ~
70 IV, 11. 6. 4| funds. Pooling enhances efficiency because it reduces incentives
71 IV, 11. 6. 4| access and administrative efficiency. Countries that do not pool
72 IV, 11. 6. 4| healthcare and equality and efficiency in healthcare delivery.
73 IV, 11. 6. 4| section 11.3.4. Technical efficiency for information on provider
74 IV, 11. 6. 4| access for equal need) and efficiency (to minimize the possibility
75 IV, 11. 6. 4| focusing on performance and efficiency. In fact, much emphasis
76 IV, 11. 6. 4| measured on the basis of efficiency and effectiveness, and not
77 IV, 11. 6. 5| Cutler DM (2002): "Equality, efficiency, and market fundamentals:
78 IV, 11. 6. 5| implications for equity and efficiency." International journal
79 IV, 11. 6. 5| in Europe: striving for efficiency, equity and quality. E.
80 IV, 11. 6. 5| in Europe: striving for efficiency, equity and quality. E.
81 IV, 11. 6. 5| improving the effectiveness and efficiency of the European health care
82 IV, 11. 6. 5| et al. (2004): "Technical efficiency in the use of health care
83 IV, 12. 10 | directorates, so as to amplify its efficiency and to ensure its consistency.
84 IV, 13. 3 | reasons of both economic efficiency and social equity. After
