Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 I, 2. 5 | flexibility and mobility). In response to globalisation and economic
2 II, 5. 1. 1| delayed type of allergic response to certain potentially sensitizing
3 II, 5. 5. 3| burden of disease approach: a response to Williams. Health Economics
4 II, 5. 8. 1| an abnormal inflammatory response of the lung to noxious particles
5 II, 5. 9. FB| produce IgE antibodies in response to ordinary exposure to
6 II, 5. 9. FB| produce an excess of IgE in response to the exposure to substances
7 II, 5. 9. FB| usually do not elicit any response in non allergic individuals.~
8 II, 5. 9. 4| PM based on the overall response pattern in the bioassays,
9 II, 5. 9. 7| air: contrasts in the dose response to cat and dust-mite. Indoor
10 II, 5. 11. 3| delayed type of allergic response to certain potentially sensitizing
11 II, 5. 11. 3| ions might have an allergic response within a matter of hours
12 II, 5. 11. 3| be sufficient to elicit a response. On this basis, the European
13 II, 5. 11. 3| does not induce an allergic response and does not penetrate the
14 II, 5. 11. 5| for a public health policy response to reduce the burden of
15 II, 5. 14. 1| creation of new roles in response to changing patterns of
16 II, 6.Acr | Control~EWRS~Early Warning and Response System~HBV~Hepatitis B Virus~
17 II, 6. 4. 2| is an early warning and response system (EWRS) to alert public
18 II, 6. 4. 2| ensure a rapid and effective response by the EU to events (including
19 II, 6. 4. 2| place an early warning and response system (EWRS). EWRS is a
20 II, 6. 4. 3| particular:~ ~· preparedness and response plans by the EU countries;~·
21 II, 6. 4. 4| of the Early Warning and Response System in order to link
22 II, 7. 5 | forward the public health response, the European Commission
23 II, 7. 6 | improvement in the public health response to interpersonal violence
24 II, 9 | problems, slowed neurological response, decreased muscle strength
25 II, 9. 1. 2| countries, give a common response to European public health
26 II, 9. 1. 2| create an appropriate policy response.~ ~g) Much greater investment
27 II, 9. 2. 5| combating of HIV/AIDS.~ ~In response to the growing problem of
28 II, 9. 3. 1| cardiovascular disease;~· response to toxins;~· brain organisation;
29 II, 9. 3. 3| Sexual behaviour changes in response to both secular and non-secular
30 II, 9. 4. 2| European countries, was a response to demands by policy makers
31 II, 9. 4. 4| problems, slowed neurological response, decreased muscle strength
32 II, 9. 5. 3| anti-depressants, and in the response to treatments and their
33 II, 9. 5. 4| as reasons for the slow response of medical science to evidence
34 III, 10. 1 | changes in our behaviour in response to those factors. Of the
35 III, 10. 1. 1| fact that the food intake response to exercise is influenced
36 III, 10. 1. 3| involved in the appetite response to moderate increases in
37 III, 10. 2. 1| wording of the question, the response categories and the related
38 III, 10. 2. 1| another important part of the response to the drug problem in Europe.
39 III, 10. 2. 1| developed into a priority response to prevent infectious diseases
40 III, 10. 2. 1| introduced this measure as a response to health-risks related
41 III, 10. 2. 1| of the questions and the response format often varies. Different
42 III, 10. 2. 1| part of the public health response to current concerns regarding
43 III, 10. 2. 1| Region and the strategies for response. Copenhagen.[ ht ] (on-line
44 III, 10. 2. 1| data collection methods, response rates, age ranges, years
45 III, 10. 2. 1| exercise that promotes bone response may be different from the
46 III, 10. 2. 1| for an effective societal response” (Commission of the European
47 III, 10. 2. 1| Region and the strategy for response. Copenhagen, World Health
48 III, 10. 2. 1| Region and the strategy for response. Summary. Copenhagen, World
49 III, 10. 2. 4| diseases as well as with response to therapies;~· the differentiation
50 III, 10. 3. 4| 4.2. Data sources~ ~ ~In response to the need for better data
51 III, 10. 3. 4| special attention during the response and recovery periods . Hospitals,
52 III, 10. 3. 4| stakeholders. An international response was also launched to deliver
53 III, 10. 3. 4| the limited public-health response was due to a lack of experts,
54 III, 10. 3. 4| public organisations . In response to this, in 2004, the French
55 III, 10. 3. 4| systems and the institutional response capacity and recovery planning.
56 III, 10. 3. 4| action and cooperation in response, due to expected increased
57 III, 10. 4. 2| characterised the 90s and in response to the damaging consequences
58 III, 10. 4. 2| Its work is undertaken in response to specific requests for
59 III, 10. 4. 2| and survival studies, dose response studies, and lifestyle studies.~ ~
60 III, 10. 4. 2| situation worldwide in response to the many requests for
61 III, 10. 4. 2| consideration of additive response including criteria to be
62 III, 10. 4. 2| describes and evaluates dose–response relationships for the most
63 III, 10. 4. 5| stress for lack of regulatory response etc) are considered. These
64 III, 10. 5. 3| flexibility and mobility). In response to globalisation and economic
65 III, 10. 6. 1| Northern Ireland (about 300). Response rates varied from 23% (Great
66 III, 10. 6. 1| the countries/regions the response rate was less than 50%.~ ~
67 III, 10. 6. 1| reflecting the highly varying response rates between countries.
68 IV, 11. 1. 3| capita (1990-2004)~ ~As a response, there was a gradual shift
69 IV, 11. 1. 5| saving eight lives. Quick response and the recognition of early
70 IV, 11. 1. 5| which initiated a rapid response system to early signs of
71 IV, 11. 2. 1| introduced in Europe as a response to the rising prevalence
72 IV, 11. 6. 2| system were withdrawn in response to considerable resistance.
73 IV, 11. 6. 5| 1992): "Reweighing heat: Response." Journal of Health Economics
74 IV, 12. 1 | life in 1950 as a direct response to shortage in coal and
75 IV, 12. 4 | crisis situations and~rapid response to life-threatening epidemics
76 IV, 12. 4 | the Commission set out its response to the report of the reflection
77 IV, 12. 5 | improvement of existing response capacity and assets, including
78 IV, 12. 10 | and monitor~a co-ordinated response to illicit drug use~at local/
79 IV, 12. 10 | deliver a~community based response to addiction via~the emerging
80 IV, 13. 4 | investments in human capital in response to new competence requirements.
81 IV, 13. 5 | the Commission set out its response to the report of the reflection
82 IV, 13. 6. 2| the early detection and response to neglect or abuse more
83 IV, 13. 7. 1| this challenge, a political response at EU level bringing together
