Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 -, 1 | considerable difficulties and limitations associated with making such
2 I, 2. 2 | of tourists with activity limitations is also expected to rise.
3 I, 2. 2 | although there are severe limitations on the relevant surveillance
4 II, 4.Acr | years with moderate activity limitations~LEwSL~The expected number
5 II, 4.Acr | years with severe activity limitations~LTC~Long Term Care~MEHM~
6 II, 4. 1 | restrictions and activity limitations (Riley, 1990). These changes
7 II, 4. 1 | years with moderate activity limitations (LEwML), the expected number
8 II, 4. 1 | years with severe activity limitations (LEwSL) and the ratio of
9 II, 4. 1 | still lived with activity limitations, close to 15 years for men
10 II, 4. 1 | 5 to 6 years with severe limitations. Women live on average 6
11 II, 4. 1 | moderate or severe activity limitations. Therefore, the HLY gender
12 II, 4. 1 | years lived with activity limitations. Therefore, the HLY gender
13 II, 4. 1 | expectancy free of activity limitations. At the age of 50, as well
14 II, 4. 1 | expected years with activity limitations are quite substantial in
15 II, 4. 1 | For both genders, activity limitations dramatically increase the
16 II, 4. 1 | Years, Years with Minor Limitations and Years with Severe Limitations,
17 II, 4. 1 | Limitations and Years with Severe Limitations, in 2005, Men~ ~Figure 4.
18 II, 4. 1 | Years, Years with Minor Limitations and Years with Severe Limitations,
19 II, 4. 1 | Limitations and Years with Severe Limitations, in 2005, Women.~ ~ ~The
20 II, 4. 1 | with some reported activity limitations. Under the current conditions
21 II, 4. 1 | years more with activity limitations, including over one year
22 II, 4. 1 | one year more with severe limitations. Severe activity limitations
23 II, 4. 1 | limitations. Severe activity limitations dramatically increase the
24 II, 5. 1. 4| on any possible transport limitations should also be readily available~ ~
25 II, 5. 5. 3| false-negative diagnoses. These limitations may be a possible explanation
26 II, 5. 5. 3| syndromic classification and the limitations of this classification for
27 II, 5. 5. 3| These include fear and limitations on lifestyle (Fisher, 2000),
28 II, 5. 5. 3| al, 2000). Similar to the limitations discussed for prevalence
29 II, 5. 6. 3| is usually associated to limitations of activities and restricted
30 II, 5. 6. 3| spinal movement cause most limitations. Chronic vertebral osteoporosis,
31 II, 5. 6. 4| In addition to functional limitations in everyday life, work disability
32 II, 5. 14. 3| emphasized in most cases limitations among population groups
33 II, 5. 15. 3| registry system has several limitations. The main one is that not
34 II, 8. 1. 1| individual’s expression of limitations in a social context (Schalock
35 II, 8. 1. 1| framework, the person’s limitations in functioning arise as
36 II, 8. 1. 1| vision deficiencies or other limitations due to aging or to sequelae
37 II, 8. 1. 2| problem or disability, work limitations (regarding the kind of work
38 II, 8. 1. 3| Presentation~ ~Prevalence of limitations and disabilities~ ~On the
39 II, 8. 1. 3| indicated they experience limitations in the kind or amount of
40 II, 8. 1. 3| different attitude of women with limitations, compared with their male
41 II, 8. 1. 3| than men with considerable limitations.~ ~Employment rates~ ~The
42 II, 8. 1. 3| those with considerable limitations and about 62% for those
43 II, 8. 1. 3| about 62% for those with limitations to some extent, as compared
44 II, 8. 1. 3| with 68% in those with no limitations. Among people aged 16-24
45 II, 8. 1. 3| 16-24 with considerable limitations, such proportion was 27%,
46 II, 8. 1. 3| of support to people with limitations in the ability to work:
47 II, 8. 1. 3| persons with considerable limitations across the EU Member States.
48 II, 8. 1. 3| of persons with partial limitations.~ ~Support is mainly provided
49 II, 8. 1. 3| People with considerable limitations hold help in transfer to
50 II, 8. 1. 3| of work, while those with limitations to some extent considered
51 II, 8. 1. 3| people with considerable limitations were 22% lower than those
52 II, 8. 1. 3| those of people without limitations. The wage gap between men
53 II, 8. 1. 3| earnings of men with strong limitations are 12% lower, while those
54 II, 8. 1. 3| people (both genders) with no limitations. Differences in earnings
55 II, 8. 1. 3| those with considerable limitations and about 14% of those limited
56 II, 8. 2. 1| characterized by significant limitations in both cognitive and adaptive
57 II, 8. 2. 1| characterized by significant limitations both in intellectual functioning
58 II, 9. 1. 1| 2002). ~ ~To address these limitations, the EURO-PERISTAT project
59 II, 9. 2. 3| scheme for categorising limitations to functioning and ability –
60 II, 9. 3. 1| studies stem from a number of limitations.~ ~In North America and
61 II, 9. 4. 3| still lived with activity limitations (i.e. about 15 years for
62 II, 9. 4. 3| 5 to 6 years with severe limitations). Longer lives do not necessarily
63 III, 10. 1. 1| physical activity show several limitations. Diet and physical activity
64 III, 10. 1. 1| Titchenal, 1988). Methodological limitations of accurately assessing
65 III, 10. 2. 1| aged 20 years and above.~ ~Limitations of current prevalence data~ ~
66 III, 10. 2. 1| have their strengths and limitations depending on aims and underlying
67 III, 10. 2. 1| However, there are inherent limitations depending on dietary assessment
68 III, 10. 4. 2| rather than by the selective limitations of the detector.~ ~The general
69 III, 10. 4. 5| Despite the methodological limitations, the available scientific
70 III, 10. 4. 5| In view of the various limitations hampering our ability to
71 III, 10. 5. 2| members state. Due to these limitations, the health data on disease
72 III, 10. 6. 3| is clear from the major limitations of the tables. Unfortunately,
73 IV, 11. 1. 1| considerable difficulties and limitations associated with making such
74 IV, 11. 1. 4| access to care. Knowledge limitations can affect some population
75 IV, 11. 1. 5| do, however, suffer from limitations relating to difficulties
76 IV, 11. 2. 2| exceptions to the above limitations is screening. In terms of
77 IV, 11. 5. 1| of organs. Despite these limitations and taking into account
78 IV, 12. 10 | drug use. ~To remedy these limitations, the~Department of Health
79 IV, 12. 10 | 2006 “Measures, terms and limitations for the management of hazardous
80 IV, 13. 3 | variables represent important limitations when developing public health
81 IV, 13. 5 | co-morbidities and experiencing limitations in performing daily life
82 IV, 13. 5 | suffer from methodological limitations, namely lack of data comparability.
