Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 -, 1 | key indicators and data coverage inevitably vary across countries,
2 I, 2. 4 | steps to increase population coverage, address financial barriers
3 I, 2. 5 | schemes and on their actual coverage. While fuller and more productive
4 I, 2. 5 | seem necessary to increase coverage currently at 50-60% on average
5 II, 5. 1. 2| hospital care, financial coverage through medical insurances,
6 II, 5. 3. 2| national cancer registration coverage, while in other countries
7 II, 5. 3. 2| countries with regional coverage, statistical techniques
8 II, 5. 3. 2| national cancer registration coverage (see above). Yet in several
9 II, 5. 3. 3| registry database with 100% coverage). The estimates do not reflect
10 II, 5. 4. 2| individual measurements and coverage of the target population.
11 II, 5. 5. 1| coding of diagnoses and coverage of hospitalisation data
12 II, 5. 5. 3| Compilation, publication and coverage across Europe is however
13 II, 5. 5. 3| degree of case ascertainment coverage based on geographic and
14 II, 5. 7. 2| patient starting RRT in their coverage area together with information
15 II, 5. 7. 2| the completeness of the coverage of their countries, data
16 II, 5. 7. 2| period or with incomplete coverage of their country. Nine additional
17 II, 5. 10. 2| redundancy and relatively low coverage of allergens by individual
18 II, 5. 14. 3| even if they have insurance coverage or qualify for the oral
19 II, 5. 14. 7| likely to receive health coverage but also less likely to
20 II, 6. 3. 2| surveillance networks, whilst coverage across and within countries
21 II, 6. 3. 3| adequate performance of and coverage with antenatal care services
22 II, 6. 3. 4| There is a WHO vaccination coverage target, accepted by all
23 II, 6. 3. 4| routinely monitor their coverage even for the elderly, and
24 II, 6. 3. 4| an improved vaccination coverage in these selected groups,
25 II, 6. 3. 5| years), even though vaccine coverage is not uniform, with Germany
26 II, 6. 3. 5| maintained high vaccination coverage and even increased it, there
27 II, 6. 3. 5| previously attained vaccine coverage levels. Political and socioeconomic
28 II, 6. 3. 5| uptake.~High vaccination coverage does not exhibit a direct
29 II, 6. 3. 5| over 95% measles vaccine coverage; most of these are in the
30 II, 6. 3. 5| Measles (MCV1) vaccine coverage.~ ~
31 II, 6. 3. 5| variation in the vaccine coverage by sex (some vaccination
32 II, 9. 1. 2| births per year. Annual birth coverage is 23.4% of births of the
33 II, 9. 1. 2| 2009.~ ~Table 9.1.2.2.1. Coverage of the European Population
34 II, 9. 1. 2| Hungary). Although complete coverage of the European population
35 II, 9. 2. 3| stable, high vaccination coverage, disease has declined, with
36 II, 9. 2. 6| negatives. This will encourage coverage of positive mental health
37 III, 10. 2. 1| national and subnational coverage, 2004-2005, all injecting
38 III, 10. 2. 1| where an estimation of the coverage of substitution treatment
39 III, 10. 2. 1| with different degrees of coverage of the region. In the following,
40 III, 10. 4. 3| WHO-European Region show that coverage in rural areas often lags
41 III, 10. 4. 3| Southern European countries coverage ranged between 40% and 60%,
42 III, 10. 4. 3| there was a 70% increase in coverage from 1980 to 2003, with
43 III, 10. 6. 2| made to increase population coverage, address financial barriers
44 IV, 11. 1. 3| generosity and equality of coverage to cost containment and
45 IV, 11. 1. 4| precondition of access to care is coverage by health insurance. Universal,
46 IV, 11. 1. 4| Universal, or near universal, coverage of the population by the
47 IV, 11. 1. 4| even when near universal coverage is achieved, there still
48 IV, 11. 1. 4| without this additional coverage (Mossialos and Thomson 2004;
49 IV, 11. 1. 4| people may be unaware that coverage by the public system relates
50 IV, 11. 1. 4| countries with universal coverage and largely publicly funded
51 IV, 11. 6 | are pooled, the levels of coverage (including cost sharing),
52 IV, 11. 6. 2| countries now provide universal coverage, though the scope (what
53 IV, 11. 6. 2| level of cost sharing) of coverage varies across Europe, with
54 IV, 11. 6. 2| universal) statutory health coverage. The most common contribution
55 IV, 11. 6. 2| where there is extensive coverage of co-payments (complementary
56 IV, 11. 6. 2| despite some hopes that such coverage would develop as a supplementary
57 IV, 11. 6. 3| recent extension of insurance coverage for the costs of user charges
58 IV, 11. 6. 4| trend towards extending coverage to health services to the
59 IV, 11. 6. 4| attainment of universal coverage is fairly recent and represents
60 IV, 11. 6. 4| represents a shift from coverage being defined on the basis
61 IV, 11. 6. 4| payment of contributions to coverage based on residence: Belgium
62 IV, 11. 6. 4| countries, which has eroded coverage to some extent. Note that
63 IV, 11. 6. 4| Note that data on universal coverage may be misleading, in particular
64 IV, 11. 6. 4| countries, while universal coverage of the population has been
65 IV, 11. 6. 4| existing (perceived) demands. Coverage of a population for health
66 IV, 11. 6. 4| health insurance systems, coverage through many national health
67 IV, 12. 3 | travelling, social security coverage abroad, more equal treatment
68 IV, 13. 5 | steps to increase population coverage, address financial barriers
69 IV, 13. 5 | national health insurance coverage. Prior authorisation can
