Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 I, 2. 5 | governing the accumulation and payment of benefits, such as indexation
2 II, 9. 1. 1| rates in Italy by hospital payment mode: an analysis based
3 II, 9. 3. 2| rates in Italy by hospital payment mode: an analysis based
4 III, 10. 5. 3| where care benefits and the payment require the accident being
5 III, 10. 5. 3| Inspection Service), but the payment of benefits does not depend
6 IV, 11. 1. 1| efficiency, including provider payment methods. It then moves to
7 IV, 11. 1. 2| waiting times, provider payment methods, and health care
8 IV, 11. 1. 3| provision; and d) reforming payment mechanisms.~ ~In order to
9 IV, 11. 1. 5| et al, 1992).~ ~Provider payment methods and quality of care~ ~
10 IV, 11. 1. 5| Quality specifications in a payment contract can be structure,
11 IV, 11. 1. 5| miscommunication, complications in payment systems, etc. (Dovey et
12 IV, 11. 1. 6| Efficiency and provider payment methods~ ~The methods used
13 IV, 11. 1. 6| financing. Specifically, these payment methods can be used to influence
14 IV, 11. 1. 6| basic methods of physician payment: fee-for-service, salary
15 IV, 11. 1. 6| many variations of these payment systems, but the basic principles
16 IV, 11. 1. 6| remain always the same. Payment can either be prospective (
17 IV, 11. 1. 6| fee-for-service and case-based payment for hospitals).~ ~Fee-for-service
18 IV, 11. 1. 6| patients. Fee-for-service payment works well when there is
19 IV, 11. 1. 6| failures.~ ~Salary is the payment of a negotiated amount of
20 IV, 11. 1. 6| services do not affect the payment. Legislation can cover overtime
21 IV, 11. 1. 6| they must come from the payment for the service to the third
22 IV, 11. 1. 6| system.~ ~Capitation is the payment of a set amount of money
23 IV, 11. 1. 6| fee-for-service is the most common payment method. Fee-for-service
24 IV, 11. 1. 6| the actual effects of the payment method on the physician’
25 IV, 11. 1. 6| experimenting with blended or mixed payment schemes, which include elements
26 IV, 11. 1. 6| 11.3 shows the physician payment methods for physicians in
27 IV, 11. 1. 6| Table 11.3. Physician payment methods in Europe~ ~Countries~
28 IV, 11. 1. 6| Salary*.~Denmark~Blended payment (63% of income from fee-for-service,
29 IV, 11. 1. 6| England~86% by blended payment (capitation, practice allowance,
30 IV, 11. 1. 6| maximum of 18% of capitation payment), monthly allowance, and
31 IV, 11. 1. 6| Mainly by salary.~Blended payment (fee-for-service and salary).~
32 IV, 11. 1. 6| patient income.~ ~ ~Blended payment (salary and fee-for-service).~ ~
33 IV, 11. 1. 6| fee-for-service).~ ~Norway~Blended payment (70% of income from fee-for-service
34 IV, 11. 1. 6| Fee-for-service.~ ~Romania~Blended payment: capitation (85%) and fee-for-service (
35 IV, 11. 1. 6| Slovak Republic~Blended payment (capitation and target~payments
36 IV, 11. 1. 6| without)~Spain~Blended payment (85% of income from salary~
37 IV, 11. 1. 6| Fee-for-service, salary and blended payment~(fee-for-service and salary).~
38 IV, 11. 1. 6| Fee-for-service, salary and blended payment~(fee-for-service and salary).~
39 IV, 11. 1. 6| experimentation with physician payment methods that stimulate physicians
40 IV, 11. 1. 6| assumption that the structure of payment methods may not facilitate (
41 IV, 11. 1. 6| 2001).~ ~The analysis of payment mechanisms generally focus
42 IV, 11. 1. 6| i.e. capitation, salaries) payment methods under the need to
43 IV, 11. 1. 6| have in place a hospital payment system based on global budgets,
44 IV, 11. 1. 6| budgets or as a form of payment (see Table 11.3). While
45 IV, 11. 1. 6| DRGs are a retrospective payment, budgets are prospective
46 IV, 11. 1. 6| not penalized). The DRG payment system was first introduced
47 IV, 11. 1. 6| full retrospective hospital payment system towards one linked
48 IV, 11. 1. 6| production.~ ~Case-based payment are designed so that providers
49 IV, 11. 1. 6| countries make use of a blended payment system. Countries in Western
50 IV, 11. 1. 6| convergence towards a mixed payment system for funding hospital
51 IV, 11. 1. 6| there is a combination of payment by actual and expected activity:
52 IV, 11. 3. 1| incentives linked to the payment mechanism to attract physicians
53 IV, 11. 6. 2| calculations of out-of-pocket payment include both cost sharing
54 IV, 11. 6. 2| increase in out-of-pocket payment, as the role of PHI remains
55 IV, 11. 6. 2| constitutes an informal payment differs across regions and
56 IV, 11. 6. 4| information on provider payment methods.~ ~ ~Redistribution (
57 IV, 11. 6. 4| defined on the basis of payment of contributions to coverage
58 IV, 11. 6. 5| 894.~ ~Boyle S (2007): "Payment by Results in England."
59 IV, 11. 6. 5| Editorial: Hospital case payment systems in Europe." Health
60 IV, 11. 6. 5| fee-for-service and mixed system of payment: effects on behaviour of
61 IV, 11. 6. 5| 2006): Incentives and Payment Systems in Austria. Report
62 IV, 11. 6. 5| Alignment and Blending of Payment Incentives within Physician
63 IV, 12. 1 | 1408/71 Providing for the payment~(creating forms E111, E112
64 IV, 12. 1 | borders~Providing for the payment health service received
65 IV, 12. 10 | system for admission to, and payment for, nursing home facilities
