Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 -, 1 | instance, definitions and measurement of key indicators and data
2 -, 1 | between local variations of measurement, if comparisons are to be
3 II, 5. 4. 2| scale, including an accurate measurement of the prevalence of the
4 II, 5. 4. 2| reporting of the HIS can cause measurement problems on a range of individual
5 II, 5. 4. 2| a tested blood pressure measurement in last 12 months~14~Percent
6 II, 5. 4. 2| mmol/l and <7,0 mmol/l).~Measurement of glycated haemoglobin (
7 II, 5. 4. 2| applicable at EU level.~Measurement of total cholesterol in
8 II, 5. 4. 2| cholesterol above 5 mmol/l.~Measurement of LDL cholesterol in the
9 II, 5. 4. 2| value above 2.6 mmol/l.~Measurement of HDL cholesterol in the
10 II, 5. 4. 2| and 1.25 mmol/l for women.~Measurement of triglycerides in the
11 II, 5. 4. 2| association between the measurement of blood pressure and age.~
12 II, 5. 4. 3| approach 70 millions in 2025.~Measurement of glycated haemoglobin (
13 II, 5. 4. 3| substantially with age.~Measurement of total cholesterol in
14 II, 5. 4. 3| the overall percentage.~Measurement of LDL cholesterol in the
15 II, 5. 4. 3| significant age effect.~Measurement of HDL cholesterol in the
16 II, 5. 4. 3| consistent amongst countries.~Measurement of triglycerides in the
17 II, 5. 4. 7| is not only a matter of measurement but also of regular measurement
18 II, 5. 4. 7| measurement but also of regular measurement made in a sustainable way
19 II, 5. 4. 7| of realistic and agreed measurement targets~· BIRO, with the
20 II, 5. 4. 7| structural quality, processes, measurement done, treatment, management);~·
21 II, 5. 5. 3| changes over time. Several measurement methods survey qualitative
22 II, 5. 5. 3| qualitative data and qualitative measurement methods do not allow representative
23 II, 5. 5. 3| and a different use of measurement methods. Therefore, data
24 II, 5. 5. 3| countries. ~ ~Quantitative measurement~ ~On national level, limited
25 II, 5. 6. 3| osteoporosis on the basis of measurement of bone mineral density (
26 II, 5. 7. 5| Mass screening through the measurement of albumin excretion has
27 II, 5. 8. 3| al, 2005). As regards the measurement of disease severity, data
28 II, 9. 2. 2| more important to focus measurement on health and the prevention
29 II, 9. 2. 6| positive mental health and measurement of mental well being, harmonising
30 II, 9. 2. 6| disability, and special needs~Measurement and impact assessment of
31 II, 9. 2. 6| variation for children of a measurement tool based on the ability
32 II, 9. 2. 6| improved identification and measurement of the problem.~ ~The health
33 II, 9. 3. 1| issues pertaining to the measurement of symptoms. A number of
34 II, 9. 3. 1| by using a non-invasive measurement of bone mineral density (
35 II, 9. 5. 4| The identification and measurement of health-damaging cultural
36 III, 10. 1. 3| empirical evidence and measurement. J Drug Educ 28(2):117-134.~
37 III, 10. 2. 1| of standardization in the measurement of smoking habits in health
38 III, 10. 2. 1| questionnaire or by objective measurement devices such as pedometers (
39 III, 10. 2. 1| instruments currently used for the measurement of physical activity revealed
40 III, 10. 2. 1| variations due to random measurement errors and, at the same
41 III, 10. 3. 1| easier and cheaper, but measurement after the first six months
42 III, 10. 3. 1| due to differences in the measurement of annoyance and definition
43 III, 10. 3. 1| hampered by differences in the measurement and definition of annoyance.
44 III, 10. 6. 3| survey-based comparative measurement of a large sample of the
45 IV, 11. 1. 1| instance, definitions and measurement of key health care terms
46 IV, 11. 1. 2| and health care quality measurement. Where possible, the information
47 IV, 11. 1. 3| to be acknowledged that measurement remains difficult. In assessing
48 IV, 11. 1. 3| health system performance measurement. Their findings and review
49 IV, 11. 1. 3| pressures and performance measurement~ ~Since the 1970s, spending
50 IV, 11. 1. 3| been concerned with the measurement of their own system’s performance
51 IV, 11. 1. 3| projects on performance measurement show some promise in this
52 IV, 11. 1. 3| for deploying performance measurement tools in modern health systems,
53 IV, 11. 1. 3| to address in performance measurement based on the objectives
54 IV, 11. 1. 5| specifications refer to quality measurement mechanisms such as data
55 IV, 11. 1. 6| quality of care into the measurement of the output of the system (
56 IV, 12. 10 | October 2003 on limit values, measurement methods, labelling, product
57 IV, 12. 10 | participating schools would operate measurement stations for estimating
58 IV, 13. 6. 1| 13.6.1 Measurement of burden and effects of
59 IV, 13. 6. 2| Health Service Quality~ ~Measurement of service quality for child
