Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1   II,     8.  2.  2|                  welfare payments, lost taxation revenue and the impaired
 2  III,    10.  2.  1|                tobacco products (price, taxation);~· measures to reduce exposure
 3  III,    10.  2.  1|                and safety as well as in taxation have also provided legal
 4  III,    10.  2.  1|                their impact. Prices and taxation policies are attributed
 5  III,    10.  2.  1|                  e.g. through price and taxation policies) and the demand
 6  III,    10.  2.  1|                their impact. Prices and taxation policies (1) are attributed
 7  III,    10.  2.  1| whole-of-government interventions (e.g. taxation and pricing policies) have
 8   IV,    11.  1.  6|              the third party or through taxation in a public system.~ ~Capitation
 9   IV,    11.  2.  1|                 those funded largely by taxation.~ ~Figure 11.2.Number of
10   IV,    11.  6.  2|      inequalities that arise from local taxation or collection of resources
11   IV,    11.  6.  2|         mechanisms are publicgeneral taxation and social insurance contributions (
12   IV,    11.  6.  2|                areas: 1) the shift from taxation to social health insurance
13   IV,    11.  6.  2|               an increasing reliance on taxation among countries with systems
14   IV,    11.  6.  2|               the Netherlands) and also taxation (e.g. Latvia shifting from
15   IV,    11.  6.  2|            Demark from local to central taxation), and 3) an increased reliance
16   IV,    11.  6.  2|             increased reliance on local taxation in countries with predominantly
17   IV,    11.  6.  2|                latest available year4~ ~Taxation~ ~Taxation has different
18   IV,    11.  6.  2|            available year4~ ~Taxation~ ~Taxation has different sources (direct
19   IV,    11.  6.  2|               While on the whole direct taxation is equitable, inequities
20   IV,    11.  6.  2|                 Spain and the UK. Local taxation may be associated to: increased
21   IV,    11.  6.  2|               2008). In addition, local taxation has the advantage of separating
22   IV,    11.  6.  2|                the other hand, national taxation has the potential to redistribute
23   IV,    11.  6.  2|              reduction.~ ~Additionally, taxation may be general, as in Italy,
24   IV,    11.  6.  2|       healthcare, as in France. General taxation draws on a broad revenue
25   IV,    11.  6.  2|             reduce public resistance to taxation because it is more visible (
26   IV,    11.  6.  2|             more visible (Commission on Taxation and Citizenship, 2000),
27   IV,    11.  6.  2|                 manipulation. Earmarked taxation may, however, cause increased
28   IV,    11.  6.  2|          Countries that rely heavily on taxation to fund their health systems
29   IV,    11.  6.  2|                earmarked versus general taxation. Overall, the potential
30   IV,    11.  6.  2|             potential revenue raised by taxation is significant, being levied
31   IV,    11.  6.  2|             greater reliance on central taxation may also increase financial
32   IV,    11.  6.  2|                many of these countries, taxation remains an important funding
33   IV,    11.  6.  2|               associated with earmarked taxation. For instance, it is more
34   IV,    11.  6.  2|                transparent than general taxation, hence tends to be more
35   IV,    11.  6.  2|          interference than revenue from taxation since an independent system
36   IV,    11.  6.  3|            Among the different types of taxation, there are different degrees
37   IV,    11.  6.  3|                 on taxes (Commission on Taxation and Citizenship, 2000).~ ~
38   IV,    11.  6.  3|         increasing reliance on indirect taxation in many Member States since
39   IV,    11.  6.  3|                as a proportion of total taxation increased from an average
40   IV,    11.  6.  3|               progressiveness of income taxation also depends on the number
41   IV,    11.  6.  3|          Zandvakili, 1994). Progressive taxation also depends on the relative
42   IV,    11.  6.  3|                tax collection. National taxation has been found to be a more
43   IV,    11.  6.  3|                 of financing than local taxation. For example, in Finland,
44   IV,    11.  6.  3|              social transfers than from taxation (Ervik, 1998).~ ~The redistributive
45   IV,    11.  6.  3|         Schneider, 1998).~ ~Contrary to taxation and social insurance where
46   IV,    11.  6.  4|                 cost variation)~Estonia~Taxation Agency~Estonian Health Insurance
47   IV,    11.  6.  5|               210-27.~ ~Hills J (2000): Taxation for the Enabling State.
48   IV,    11.  6.  5|           Duncan A (1995): Hypothecated taxation: an evaluation of recent
49   IV,    11.  6.  5|              and redistribution through taxation: an international comparison."
50   IV,    12.  2    |                tobacco products (price, taxation);~· measures to reduce exposure
51  Key,   Ap5.  0.  0|                      tachycardia~tattoo~taxation~teenagers~teeth~temperature~