Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1    I,     2.  9    |             cause natural hazards and damage to infrastructure and changes
 2   II,     5.  1.  1|              Chronic pancreatitis can damage the insulin producing cells,
 3   II,     5.  2.  6|        presence of less severe tissue damage. For instance, the use of
 4   II,     5.  2.  6|           introduction of new myocite damage markers (troponins), has
 5   II,     5.  4.  1| hyperglycaemia, followed by long-term damage and failure of different
 6   II,     5.  4.  1|         vision loss, nerve and kidney damage), and larger blood vessels (
 7   II,     5.  4.  1|              problems can cause nerve damage in the hands and feet. Because
 8   II,     5.  4.  1|               blood glucose can cause damage to the small blood vessels
 9   II,     5.  4.  5|              Chronic pancreatitis can damage the insulin producing cells,
10   II,     5.  5.  2|               involve the progressive damage and death of brain cells.
11   II,     5.  6.  3|      increases with progressive joint damage.~ ~Incidence~ ~The incidence
12   II,     5.  6.  3|              perception, radiological damage and extra-articular manifestations (
13   II,     5.  7.  1|              manifested by:~1. Kidney damage, with or without decreased
14   II,     5.  7.  1|     abnormalities~• markers of kidney damage~urinary abnormalities (proteinuria)~
15   II,     5.  7.  1|                with or without kidney damage~ ~ ~ ~ ~Table 5.7.2. Current
16   II,     5.  7.  1|           Code~ ~Treatment~ ~1~Kidney damage~with normal or higher GFR*~>
17   II,     5.  7.  1|       transplant recipient~ ~2~Kidney damage~with mild decrease in GFR*~
18   II,     5.  7.  7|           2003): Prevalence of kidney damage in Australian adults: the
19   II,     5.  9.  4|            adducts, biomarkers of DNA damage, susceptibility factors,
20   II,     5.  9.  5|        hyperresponsiveness and tissue damage leading to long-term complaints
21   II,     5. 14.  3|               than disease and tissue damage antecedents. Surveillance
22   II,     6.  3.  6|             varying degrees of foetal damage. The definitive host of
23   II,     7.  2.  3|              injury (no statistics on damage - only accidents). The major
24   II,     9.  2.  3|             controversy about alleged damage caused by MMR (measles,
25  III,    10.  1    |             groups at higher risk for damage or disease from environmental
26  III,    10.  2.  1|          which aims at minimizing the damage to the population’s health
27  III,    10.  3.  1|              when inhaled, cause gene damage, mutations and finally cancer.
28  III,    10.  3.  2|       accidents typically cause acute damage in terms of fatalities,
29  III,    10.  3.  2|           economic responsibility for damage and negative impacts on
30  III,    10.  3.  4|            with an estimated economic damage of more than 78.000 Million
31  III,    10.  3.  4|            Table 10.3.4.2. Deaths and damage from extreme weather events
32  III,    10.  3.  4|            claimed 4 400 Million US $ damage each, Germany 1650 Million
33  III,    10.  3.  4|             880 Million US $ economic damage. ~ ~Some crucial lessons
34  III,    10.  3.  4|              4.2). The total economic damage in the past sixteen years
35  III,    10.  3.  4|              geographic displacement, damage to the home or loss of family
36  III,    10.  3.  4|               10 000 people homeless. Damage to the economy was estimated
37  III,    10.  3.  4|            geographical displacement, damage to the home or loss of familiar
38  III,    10.  3.  4|            costs, led to an estimated damage of more than 11 billion
39  III,    10.  3.  4|             fires. Fires cause burns, damage from smoke inhalation and
40  III,    10.  4.  1|             is clear that significant damage from air pollution will
41  III,    10.  4.  1|        describes the estimated health damage due to PM2.5 and the effect
42  III,    10.  4.  1|               4.1.2. Estimated health damage due to PM2.5 in the EU 2000
43  III,    10.  4.  1|      accidents. The highest estimated damage to health occurs in the
44  III,    10.  4.  1|              pollution related health damage in the EU in 2000 has been
45  III,    10.  4.  1|             is clear that significant damage from air pollution will
46  III,    10.  4.  1|       increasingly been recognised.~ ~Damage to health is caused primarily
47  III,    10.  4.  2|              feed~products~ ~ ~Kidney damage and~urinary tract tumours~(‘
48   IV,    11.  5.  4|        ischemic times and avoid organ damage. While maintaining medical
49   IV,    12.  1    |         reducing drugs-related health damage, including information and
50   IV,    13.  2.  3|             groups at higher risk for damage or disease from environmental
51  Key,   Ap5.  0.  0|                            daly~dalys~damage~damages~damp~dampness~deafness~