Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1    -,     1        |                Report adopts a European comparative perspective, there are considerable
 2    I,     2.  5    |             Work on the methodology for comparative analysis and the exchange
 3    I,     2. 10.  1|              may include functional and comparative genomics and/or in silico
 4   II,     5.  3.  2|                cancer care by providing comparative data about treatment patterns
 5   II,     5.  4.  6|            Health targeted the need for comparative information on the following
 6   II,     5.  5.  3|               there are little accurate comparative data on prescribing patterns
 7   II,     5.  5.  3|               daily doses or DDD, and a comparative standard is emerging based
 8   II,     5.  5.  3|              not so great as to prevent comparative analysis and do not explain
 9   II,     5.  5.  3|             changes do not prevent some comparative analysis and do not fully
10   II,     5.  5.  3|                 cannot be estimated, as comparative estimates of the rate of
11   II,     5.  5.  3|                of multiple sclerosis: a comparative study of four centres in
12   II,     5.  5.  3|       industry-sponsored studies, and a comparative analysis of burden-of-disease,
13   II,     5.  6.  6|         disorders in the community: the comparative prevalence of symptoms at
14   II,     5.  7.  3|         compared to Norway. In a recent comparative study (Hallan et al, 2006a)
15   II,     5. 11.  3|              gold sodium thiosulfate. A comparative study, Contact Dermatitis,
16   II,     5. 11.  6|                 complete absence of any comparative prevalence surveys of skin
17   II,     9.  1.  1|               information, there are no comparative data available on the principal
18   II,     9.  1.  1|          Pharoah P, Sturgiss SN (2000): Comparative trends in cause-specific
19   II,     9.  1.  2|               of prescription drugs and comparative risk assessment. Elsevier
20   II,     9.  2.  6|              the enhanced collection of comparative data on children, including
21   II,     9.  3.  2|          Pharoah P, Sturgiss SN (2000): Comparative trends in cause-specific
22   II,     9.  3.  3|                many different groups.~· Comparative data on health of adolescents
23   II,     9.  3.  3|               for the systematic use of comparative indicators for sexual behaviour
24   II,     9.  3.  3|            general health surveys using comparative sexual health indicators
25   II,     9.  3.  3|          behaviour in HIV epidemiology: Comparative analysis in France and Britain.
26  III,    10.  2.  1|              and medicine~ECAS~European Comparative Alcohol Study~ELSA~Enforcement
27  III,    10.  2.  1| Commission-funded projects~ ~· European Comparative Alcohol Study (ECAS) reports (
28  III,    10.  2.  1|           Health Organization (WHO)~ ~· Comparative Risk Assessment Study, carried
29  III,    10.  2.  1|                Database~ ~International comparative surveys~ ~· European Schools
30  III,    10.  2.  1|                their ability to provide comparative dietary intake information
31  III,    10.  2.  1|               high body mass index). In Comparative quantification of health
32  III,    10.  2.  5|                and it provides the only comparative European data on early mother-child
33  III,    10.  5.  1|              are very few international comparative studies on the school environment
34  III,    10.  5.  1|                 of the world. One small comparative EU-funded study in west-Europe
35  III,    10.  6.  1|            burden of crime in the EU. A comparative analysis of the European
36  III,    10.  6.  3|                by means of survey-based comparative measurement of a large sample
37  III,    10.  6.  3|        addresses new needs for European comparative data for policy-makers.
38  III,    10.  6.  3|        policy-makers. EUICS published a comparative analysis of crime and safety
39   IV,    11.  1.  1|               chapter adopts a European comparative perspective, there are considerable
40   IV,    11.  1.  1|          context based on well-informed comparative research. The challenge
41   IV,    11.  1.  2|                 for the majority of the comparative figures on health expenditure,
42   IV,    11.  1.  2|                across countries and the comparative figures should be interpreted
43   IV,    11.  1.  2|                 important cross-country comparative projects in areas such as
44   IV,    11.  1.  3|             useful starting point for a comparative analysis, although as shown
45   IV,    11.  1.  5|               medical practice, provide comparative performance data and encourage
46   IV,    11.  1.  5|              surveys and opinion polls. Comparative data across countries tend
47   IV,    11.  6.  5|                 Aim of Social Policy: a Comparative Analysis of Taxes, Tax Expenditure
48   IV,    11.  6.  5|                 2005): "Methods for the comparative evaluation of pharmaceuticals."
49   IV,    12.  4    |           social policy on the basis of comparative information, research and
50   IV,    12. 10    |             associations~Foundation for comparative product testing (Stiftung
51   IV,    13.  6.  2|               as this; thus, meaningful comparative analyses of issues such