Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1   II,     5.  3.  2|            the minimal and optimal sample size and design for establishing
 2   II,     5.  4.  1|           l (200mg/dl) in a random sample or a fasting plasma sample
 3   II,     5.  4.  1|         sample or a fasting plasma sample 7.0 mmol/l (126 mg/dl) and /
 4   II,     5.  4.  2|           A HES, provided that the sample is well drawn, delivers
 5   II,     5.  5.  1|         ESEMeD study is based on a sample of 21,425 non-institutionalized
 6   II,     5.  5.  3|   Qualitative studies with a small sample size allow a well-grounded
 7   II,     5.  5.  3|   population groups can be used as sample group (students in high
 8   II,     5.  5.  3|   generalisation, research design, sample size, and a different use
 9   II,     5.  5.  3|          employment situation in a sample of European countries (i.e.
10   II,     5.  8.  3|  age-stratified general population sample of middle-aged and elderly
11   II,     5.  8.  3|            of a general population sample in Bergen (Norway).~ ~Among
12   II,     5.  8.  3|            in a general population sample of 25-73 year old patients
13   II,     5.  8.  7|  age-stratified general population sample. Chest 2006; 129: 879-885.~ ~
14   II,     5.  8.  7|            in a general population sample: the NICECOPD study. Eur
15   II,     5.  9.  2|    countries, chosen from a random sample of schools. Standardized
16   II,     5.  9.  2|            II, in a smaller random sample of subjects who had completed
17   II,     5.  9.  4|                2001) is based on a sample of 4470 children from 10
18   II,     5.  9.  4|        asthma (ever) for the whole sample was 9%, without differences
19   II,     5.  9.  4|         2006 in a population-based sample of 17,641 0-to 17-year-olds,
20   II,     5. 10.  7|          practices, in a community sample. Psychol Health Med 5:419-
21   II,     5. 14.  2|     specific communities including sample registration systems, surveillance
22   II,     5. 14.  2|           been conducted on random sample of children, adolescents,
23   II,     5. 14.  2|          based on a representative sample of the population of the
24   II,     5. 14.  3|     prevalence measure in a random sample of 1379 12-year old children
25   II,     8.  2.  1|         survey of a representative sample. In this way, people with
26   II,     8.  2.  1|          2007, an examination of a sample of these surveys was undertaken
27   II,     8.  2.  1|      health barometer surveys with sample sizes of N=1,000, to population
28   II,     8.  2.  1|           census surveys reporting sample sizes in excess of N=10
29   II,     8.  2.  1|          for a survey to include a sample of people with intellectual
30   II,     8.  2.  1|         2007a) examined data for a sample of n=10,438 British children,
31   II,     8.  2.  1|      suitable for use in censuses, sample based national surveys,
32   II,     8.  2.  3|          1985-1993 on a population sample ob about 553000 children
33   II,     9.  2.  2|           is one such example. The sample size is too small for it
34   II,     9.  2.  2|      beyond Europe. Using a survey sample in each country, it gives
35   II,     9.  2.  2|           that it obtains a robust sample of children in each country,
36   II,     9.  4.  3|    prevalence in males. In a small sample of patients resident in
37  III,    10.  2.  1|          stratification variables, sample sizes and age limits. For
38  III,    10.  2.  1|      interview of a representative sample of the population aged 15
39  III,    10.  2.  1|     specific communities including sample registration systems, surveillance
40  III,    10.  2.  1|            a non institutionalized sample, which may include children
41  III,    10.  2.  1|            collected in a national sample of children by three countries (
42  III,    10.  2.  1|        countries, and sub-national sample in another two (Belgium
43  III,    10.  2.  1|                 A food survey in a sample of Italian secondary school
44  III,    10.  2.  1|        revealed in almost 20% of a sample of Austrian elderly. Furthermore,
45  III,    10.  2.  1|   Statistics (2004): HIS CIR 2002: sample survey of the health status
46  III,    10.  4.  2|          all screening data from a sample, with interpretation limited
47  III,    10.  6.  1|           sampling method. The net sample sizes were about 1000 per
48  III,    10.  6.  3| comparative measurement of a large sample of the European public.
49   IV,    11.  1.  5|          professionals, a sizeable sample did not. Although patients