Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 I, 2. 8 | disposal is a "must" for policy makers. The market price of energy
2 I, 2. 10. 1| healthcare systems, policy makers and industries are not prepared
3 I, 2. 10. 5| solving and helping division makers in their task is great and
4 II, 4. 1 | the near future and policy makers will have more experience
5 II, 5. 1. 2| national level, health decision makers are also following the recommendations
6 II, 5. 4. 4| should serve to inform policy makers that, on average, a town
7 II, 5. 5.Int| professionals and Government policy makers in finding key facts and
8 II, 5. 5. 2| great importance to policy makers responsible for organising
9 II, 5. 5. 2| national and European policy makers to consider these recommendations
10 II, 5. 5. 3| practice. Furthermore, policy makers should regularly review
11 II, 5. 5. 3| by MS, including policy makers and administrators, the
12 II, 5. 6. 4| economic burden for policy makers when prioritizing resources
13 II, 5. 7. 6| data will assist policy makers and other stakeholders in
14 II, 5. 10. 6| food industry and policy makers to prevent adverse effects
15 II, 5. 14. 1| among public health policy makers is that some special groups
16 II, 5. 14. 5| among public health policy makers is that some special groups
17 II, 7. 4. 5| Valuable information for policy makers on the safety of products
18 II, 7. 5 | information between policy makers, researchers and practitioners
19 II, 7. 5 | Support for policy makers on the “seven priorities”
20 II, 8. 2. 1| rightfully expect that policy makers at Community level as well
21 II, 9. 4. 1| new challenges for policy makers and the resources available
22 II, 9. 4. 2| 2. Data sources~ ~Policy makers should not assume that all
23 II, 9. 4. 2| response to demands by policy makers and scientists for a greater
24 III, 10. 2. 1| most effective.~ ~Policy makers can therefore build on a
25 III, 10. 2. 1| booklets reach out to policy makers with strong advocacy messages
26 III, 10. 2. 1| messages and address policy makers to raise awareness about
27 III, 10. 2. 4| Health care systems, policy makers and industries are struggling
28 III, 10. 2. 4| information sources provide policy makers and researchers with piecemeal
29 III, 10. 2. 4| as physicians and policy makers are empowered to stratify
30 III, 10. 4. 2| management phase, the decision makers need to consider a range
31 III, 10. 4. 2| circumstances, decision makers or risk managers, may take
32 III, 10. 4. 4| Valuable information for policy makers on the safety of products
33 III, 10. 5. 3| policy fields.~Decision makers and advisers in the field
34 III, 10. 5. 3| point for action, policy makers should bear in mind some
35 III, 10. 5. 3| to migrants.~ ~Decision makers and advisers in the field
36 III, 10. 6. 2| This evidence puts policy makers before a challenge. Reducing
37 III, 10. 6. 2| approaches among policy makers and practitioners, so that
38 IV, 11. 1. 3| be popular among policy makers, those based on a single
39 IV, 11. 1. 5| much attention for policy makers, medical professional and
40 IV, 11. 2. 2| to better inform policy makers (Kelly et al, 2005). One
41 IV, 12. 4 | information for health policy makers (Table 12.7). Working as
42 IV, 12. 5 | stakeholders and policy makers, develop consultation mechanisms
43 IV, 12. 10 | reports, addressing policy makers as well as other stakeholders
44 IV, 13. 3 | facing public health decision makers. More research is needed
45 IV, 13. 3 | to better inform policy makers. Within this context, the
46 IV, 13. 8 | the ways in which policy makers understand and respond to
47 IV, 13. 8 | direct contacts with policy makers. These are activities most
48 IV, 13. 8 | policy advice. Decision makers give priority not to claims
49 IV, 13. 8 | Regular dialogues with policy makers can produce many positive
