Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 I, 2. 6 | European Commission, 2006).~ ~Considering the large increase of life
2 I, 2. 7 | compromises to be made, and considering the role of determining
3 I, 2. 10. 4| expired or in excess17. Considering that inventory management
4 I, 3. 3 | obviously of importance when considering the financing of long-term
5 II, 5. 4. 6| and hyperlipidaemia. When considering population-based screening,
6 II, 5. 4. 6| epidemiological evidence by considering the establishment of standardised
7 II, 5. 4. 6| working effectively, and considering the need for further action;~·
8 II, 5. 5. 3| number of EU-countries. Considering in-patients per 1,000 populations (
9 II, 5. 5. 3| factors very difficult. Considering the ongoing collection of
10 II, 5. 6. 3| operationalized this concept by considering osteoporosis to be present
11 II, 5. 6. 4| need to be considered when considering the economic impact of musculoskeletal
12 II, 5. 7. 3| In the Swedish study (considering children and adolescents
13 II, 5. 8. 3| in 1998-2002 showed that, considering the total cost for treatment
14 II, 5. 11. 3| increased morbidity) when considering skin disease only from a
15 II, 5. 11. 4| limited. This is surprising considering skin disease is so common
16 II, 5. 14. 5| systems is an added challenge, considering that this should be done
17 II, 5. 15. 1| There is a clear answer when considering the prevalence of the disease
18 II, 5. 15. 1| not the only reason for considering RD from a public health
19 II, 6. 3. 2| Primary prevention~ ~Considering the mechanisms behind the
20 II, 6. 3. 7| infectivity (most VHF), etc. Considering the type of diseases and
21 II, 7. 3. 4| scope can be estimated by considering all unintentional fatalities
22 II, 8. 2. 1| taken into account when considering the health of the individuals
23 II, 9. 1. 2| Some European countries are considering folic acid fortification
24 II, 9. 2. 2| limited value placed on considering children as a group in their
25 II, 9. 2. 5| there seems to be scope for considering impartially and scientifically
26 II, 9. 2. 6| Commission thrust towards considering Health in All Policies,
27 II, 9. 3. 1| testosterone towards lower levels. Considering the population ageing trend
28 III, 10. 2. 1| very conservative estimate, considering the fact that only two major
29 III, 10. 2. 1| females, especially when considering regular drug use. The routes
30 III, 10. 2. 1| significant public health issue considering the lifetime impact of lack
31 III, 10. 2. 1| subjects compared to omnivores. Considering the high prevalence of cardiovascular
32 III, 10. 2. 1| osteoporosis and this is of concern considering that the elderly are prone
33 III, 10. 2. 1| generally underestimated and considering the increasing proportion
34 III, 10. 2. 4| health and particularly considering the economic, ethical, legal
35 III, 10. 2. 4| effects. Furthermore, by considering only phenotype data instead
36 III, 10. 2. 4| Health and particularly considering the economic, ethical, legal
37 III, 10. 3. 2| extremely difficult to assess, considering both confirmed and perceived
38 III, 10. 4. 1| are typical examples. When considering human health and the quality
39 III, 10. 4. 2| pesticide residues via food, considering the different food consumption
40 III, 10. 4. 2| in European Commission, considering that emerging risks are
41 III, 10. 4. 5| incinerators are less polluting, considering both public health and contribution
42 III, 10. 4. 5| airborne pollutant levels.~ ~Considering the current increase of
43 III, 10. 4. 5| exposure pathways, before considering site specific epidemiological
44 III, 10. 6. 1| and their children. When considering all age groups, daily contact
45 IV, 11. 1. 4| visit, and many more when considering total number of GP visits
46 IV, 12. 10 | still in the process of considering mergers. Almost 300 municipalities
47 IV, 13. 7. 4| controversial ethical issue considering that many countries that
