Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1   II,     5.  5.  2|          people over 85. A DELPHI consensus method was used. This is
 2   II,     5.  5.  2|  prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study. The Lancet, Vol.
 3   II,     5.  5.  3|           MS;~· It signposts core consensus documents and materials
 4   II,     5.  5.  3|        the EU Member States.~ ~EU Consensus documents and reference
 5   II,     5.  5.  3|    Immunomodulatory Therapy of MS Consensus PaperCurrent therapeutic
 6   II,     5.  5.  3|        multiple sclerosis therapy consensus group (MSTCG) critically
 7   II,     5.  5.  3|             Symptomatic Therapies Consensus Paper based on the German
 8   II,     5.  5.  3|           developed and published consensus guidelines based on the
 9   II,     5.  5.  3|           of MS neurologists. The Consensus paper includes treatment
10   II,     5.  5.  3|           policy developments and consensus papers in the field. In
11   II,     5.  5.  3|        Multiple Sclerosis Therapy Consensus Group (MSTCG) of the German
12   II,     5.  5.  3|        Multiple sclerosis therapy consensus group) and Rieckmann P (
13   II,     5.  5.  3|        Multiple sclerosis therapy consensus group) (2007): “Escalating
14   II,     5.  5.  3|    Immunomodulatory Therapy of MS Consensus Paper , Revised version
15   II,     5.  5.  3|        Multiple Sclerosis Therapy Consensus Group~PML~Progressive Multifocal
16   II,     5.  9.  5| indicators; and agree on and gain consensus with local physician champions
17   II,     9.  1.  1|         indicators using a DELPHI consensus process with scientific
18   II,     9.  1.  1|          evidence, as well as the consensus of epidemiologists, clinicians
19   II,     9.  2.  2|           national systems, hence consensus of topics and definitions
20   II,     9.  2.  2|  immensely complicated to reach a consensus on common instruments for
21   II,     9.  3.  1|      sequelae. There is a lack of consensus as to whether changes in
22   II,     9.  3.  1|  immensely complicated to reach a consensus on common instruments for
23   II,     9.  3.  1|           varies widely. There is consensus about the marked temporal
24   II,     9.  3.  1|       male sexual function.’ (NIH consensus development panel, 1992).
25   II,     9.  3.  1|            Whilst there is little consensus over the actual numbers
26   II,     9.  3.  1|  Currently, there is no universal consensus on the hormonal and clinical
27   II,     9.  3.  1|     Disorders, 71(1-3):1-9.~ ~NIH Consensus Development Program (1992)
28   II,     9.  3.  1|     National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement.
29   II,     9.  3.  1|            Available from: http://consensus.nih.gov/1992/1992Impotence091html.
30   II,     9.  3.  2|     developed since it requires a consensus on conditions to include
31  III,    10.  2.  1|        measures. There is a broad consensus on the effectiveness of
32  III,    10.  2.  1|           society. There is broad consensus on the effectiveness of
33  III,    10.  2.  1|         Europe (1999): Gothenburg Consensus Paper. Health impact assessment:
34  III,    10.  4.  2|           PCBs~ ~There is general consensus on the science of dioxin
35  III,    10.  4.  2|           EFSA. There was general consensus that a risk-benefit analysis
36  III,    10.  4.  5|      community autonomy and build consensus.~ ~Since the cost of hazardous
37  III,    10.  5.  3|       enterprises. The scientific consensus is that preventive measures
38   IV,    11.  1.  3|          has brought to a growing consensus towards the concept that
39   IV,    11.  1.  3|     population health outcomes; a consensus supported and in part driven
40   IV,    11.  1.  5|     systematic framework, or even consensus, on how to define quality
41   IV,    11.  1.  5|      countries was developed, and consensus recommendations of an international
42   IV,    11.  5.  1|          diseases, establishing a consensus about common basic guidelines
43   IV,    11.  5.  3|      Figure 11.16 shows, there is consensus in the use of a number of
44   IV,    11.  5.  6|         to contribute to create a consensus on European common standards
45   IV,    11.  5.  6|       organ donation – a European consensus document~1997Recom 16 on
46   IV,    12.  7    |           to the development of a consensus on the approaches to assess
47   IV,    13.  3    |           at European level, of a consensus methodological approach