Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1    I,     2.  2        |          2005 (the same as in the USA and double that of Japan
 2    I,     2.  3        |        immigrants compared to the USA, Australia and Canada, while
 3    I,     2.  5        |        immigrants compared to the USA, Australia and Canada, while
 4    I,     2. 10.  4(20)|           June 2006, Minneapolis, Usa~
 5   II,     4.  1        |         United States of America (USA) and Japan, our main economic
 6   II,     4.  1        |  expectancy at birth in the EU27, USA and Japan in 1995 and in
 7   II,     4.  1        |         United States of America (USA) and in Japan in 1995 and
 8   II,     4.  1        |          identical for men in the USA and in EU27 but that LE
 9   II,     4.  1        |      higher than in both EU27 and USA. Women’s LE at birth is
10   II,     4.  1        |          the EU27 compared to the USA but three years lower than
11   II,     4.  1        |       range from 5.2 years in the USA to 7 years in Japan. Finally,
12   II,     4.  1        |          been promoted within the USA through the development
13   II,     4.  1        | indicators between the EU and the USA are further developed in
14   II,     4.  3        |            Aldershot - Brookfield USA - Singapore - Sydney, Ashgate:
15   II,     5.  4.  1    |          China with 39.8 million, USA, Russia, Germany, Japan,
16   II,     5.  5.  3    |      Member States as well as the USA and Canada participated (
17   II,     5.  5.  3    |    Portugal, Republic of Ireland, USA, Macedonia, Netherlands,
18   II,     5.  5.  3    |            RAP) programmes in the USA. In some European Countries
19   II,     5.  5.  3    |       Multiple Sclerosis Society (USA): Advisory Committee on
20   II,     5.  6.  3    |       have been found also in the USA.~ ~It is estimated that
21   II,     5.  7.  1    |          per case per year in the USA (Smith et al, 2004). A considerable
22   II,     5.  7.  3    |   Communities (ARIC) Study in the USA, a study which enrolled
23   II,     5.  7.  3    |     survey made in Norway. In the USA, the incidence of ESRD appears
24   II,     5.  7.  3    |         current prevalence in the USA (11%). This contrasts with
25   II,     5.  7.  3    |      periodic surveys made in the USA (NHANES III and NHANES IV
26   II,     5.  8.  3    |       different countries (Spain, USA, Sweden, The Netherlands,
27   II,     5.  9.  3    |         and elsewhere (Australia, USA), that the rising trends
28   II,     5.  9.  4    |     pollen was low (except in the USA), but this was expected
29   II,     5.  9.  4    |           High~–~High~High~–~High~USA~ Portland~High~High~High~
30   II,     5. 11.  3    |         and W Uter, 2003). In the USA, where no nickel regulation
31   II,     6.  3.  7    |        most imported cases is the USA, where an increasing number
32   II,     9.  1.  1    |          in singleton gestations: USA, 1995-2000. J Matern Fetal
33   II,     9.  3.  2    |          in singleton gestations: USA, 1995-2000. J Matern Fetal
34  III,    10.  1.  3    |          5 ed. Pacific Grove, CA, USA: Duxbury.~Schmitt NM, Wagner
35  III,    10.  2.  1    |       approved both in Europe and USA, is a partial nicotine agonist
36  III,    10.  2.  1    |    Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA, USA) (2006): Research report
37  III,    10.  2.  1    |          of the World such as the USA. It has been shown that
38  III,    10.  4.  1    |            Several studies in the USA and Canada (6-city study,
39  III,    10.  4.  1    |         Olympic games in Atlanta, USA in which the impact of changes
40  III,    10.  4.  2    |          United Kingdom, Germany, USA, Canada). The public health
41  III,    10.  4.  2    |            definition used in the USA, but modified to take into
42   IV,    12.  2        |       approved both in Europe and USA, is a partial nicotine agonist