Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1    I,     2. 10.  5|           studies with the aim of assessing the relative effectiveness
 2   II,     5.  4.  6|        currently no benchmark for assessing the level of implementation
 3   II,     5.  4.  6|        provided by Member States, assessing the extent to which the
 4   II,     5.  5.  3|          appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical
 5   II,     5.  9.  3|      Marco et al, 2002), aimed at assessing the incidence and remission
 6   II,     5. 15.  6|          Ubel P, Rovira J (2007): Assessing the economic challenges
 7   II,     8.  2.  1|           of the Mini PAS-ADD for assessing psychiatric disorders in
 8   II,     9.  1    |     provides an evidence base for assessing the efficacy of technology
 9   II,     9.  2.  2|   quantitative. For example, when assessing a child’s experience, it
10   II,     9.  3.  1|       progress in the methods for assessing the risk of osteoporotic
11   II,     9.  3.  3|          young adults in Finland: Assessing risk and protective behaviour
12  III,    10.  1.  1|         limitations of accurately assessing energy expenditure and intake
13  III,    10.  2.  1|         to measure activity (e.g. assessing the time spent in and the
14  III,    10.  2.  1|    activity) and inactivity (e.g. assessing the hours spent sitting).~ ~
15  III,    10.  2.  5|          complicating factor when assessing impact of chemical, biological
16  III,    10.  3.  1|         criteria commonly used in assessing causality (particularly
17  III,    10.  3.  1|     Commission published a report assessing the existing Community framework
18  III,    10.  3.  2|          complicating factor when assessing the impact of chemicals
19  III,    10.  3.  2|       Barton, H.A. et al. (2005): Assessing susceptibility from early-life
20  III,    10.  4.  2|         tools that can be used in assessing the safety and quality of
21  III,    10.  4.  2|         190 active substances for assessing the actual exposures of
22  III,    10.  5.  1|        owners are responsible for assessing the quality of the water.
23  III,    10.  5.  1|          smoke from solid fuels - Assessing the burden of disease at
24   IV,    11.  1.  3| measurement remains difficult. In assessing the contribution to health
25   IV,    11.  1.  3|    efforts – is a key element for assessing the performance of health
26   IV,    11.  1.  5| particular interventions and with assessing the spillover effects of
27   IV,    11.  1.  5|             Other challenges with assessing the effects of financial
28   IV,    11.  1.  5|         universal underreporting, assessing the actual size of medical
29   IV,    11.  1.  6|      insurance markets related to assessing risk, setting premiums,
30   IV,    11.  4    |        everyone to collaborate on assessing new health technologies
31   IV,    11.  6.  4|     management costs, rather than assessing outcomes. However, Decision
32   IV,    11.  6.  4|          probabilistic models for assessing performance in terms of
33   IV,    11.  6.  5|         for deriving criteria for assessing the quality of medical care."
34   IV,    11.  6.  5|           On PopulationsHealth: Assessing The Evidence." Health Affairs
35   IV,    12.  2    |          these bodies in terms of assessing what is needed and what
36   IV,    12.  2    |        currently no benchmark for assessing the level of implementation
37   IV,    12.  8    |      could be launched, including assessing the impact of the enlargement
38   IV,    12. 10    |      government for preparing and assessing the public health goals:
39   IV,    13.  2    |                             13.2. Assessing priorities through estimation
40   IV,    13.  6.  1|           much work to be done in assessing systematically this overall
41   IV,    13.  6.  2|          measure. But in general, assessing the quality of these services
42   IV,    13.  7.  2|    emphasis is shifting away from assessing what can be done to improve