Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1   II,     5.  2.  2|            the WHO MONICA Project assessed in 37 populations of 21
 2   II,     5.  4.  3|          pressure. The percentage assessed by EUCID varies between
 3   II,     5.  5.  3|        adolescents). Findings are assessed through cross-sectional
 4   II,     5.  5.  3|      current quality standards as assessed by the AGREE (Appraisal
 5   II,     5.  5.  3|   location and whether cases were assessed prospectively or retrospectively.
 6   II,     5.  5.  3|        regions have been multiply assessed. The overall prevalence
 7   II,     5.  5.  3|            Costs, retrospectively assessed, were presented as total
 8   II,     5.  5.  3|          precise scores cannot be assessed in historical or cross-sectional
 9   II,     5.  6.  3|          such as bone turnover as assessed by bone markers. Frailty
10   II,     5.  7.  5|      related to population needs, assessed at regional level. In 2004
11   II,     5.  8.  3|          bronchitis and COPD were assessed at 22% and 12% in never-smokers (
12   II,     5.  8.  3|         Disease (NICECOPD) study, assessed the prevalence of obstructive
13   II,     5.  8.  3|               The Po Delta survey assessed the prevalence of GOLD-COPD
14   II,     5.  8.  4|          bronchitis and COPD were assessed at 42% and 32%, respectively,
15   II,     5.  9.  2|          and 13-15 years old were assessed through a self administered
16   II,     5.  9.  2|        large number of countries) assessed the prevalence of objective
17   II,     5.  9.  4| sensitization to each allergen as assessed by skin tests.~ ~Table 5.
18   II,     5.  9.  4|        each allergen by centre as assessed by skin tests~ ~ ~ ~Centre~
19   II,     5.  9.  6|  Baiardini et al, 2006). HRQoL is assessed by means of validated questionnaires,
20   II,     5. 10.  5|        the level of allergenicity assessed by the EFSA for the relevant
21   II,     5. 11.  4|  considered. Various studies have assessed the economic impact of specific
22   II,     5. 14.  1| populations that still have to be assessed and whose risk factors are
23   II,     8.  2.  2|    programmes; the need should be assessed for education and awareness
24   II,     9.  3.  1|          people are not routinely assessed for osteoporosis and may
25   II,     9.  3.  1|         Prostate status should be assessed by PSA analysis and digital
26   II,     9.  3.  2|         of healthcare quality, as assessed by mothers themselves.~ ~
27  III,    10.  2.  1|       adult smoking prevalence is assessed from the standard questionnaire
28  III,    10.  2.  1|     behaviour was less frequently assessed and the results were inconsistent (
29  III,    10.  2.  1|       environments, are often not assessed. Health impact assessment
30  III,    10.  2.  1|          10 European countries as assessed by 24-hour dietary recalls.
31  III,    10.  4.  2|      Scientific Committee on Food assessed the risk of dioxin-like
32  III,    10.  4.  2|           before 01/09/2008 to be assessed within one year (Deadline:
33  III,    10.  4.  2|           active substances to be assessed;~· each active substance
34  III,    10.  4.  2|        414 after 01/09/2008 to be assessed individually. (Deadline:
35  III,    10.  4.  2|          and the benefit(s) to be assessed and to formulate clearly
36  III,    10.  4.  2|     confidence in the way risk is assessed. EFSA uses a variety of
37  III,    10.  5.  1|       urban conditions, cannot be assessed in general terms, as it
38  III,    10.  5.  3|         the European workforce as assessed by the 2005 European Union
39  III,    10.  5.  3|   European Member States. This is assessed by the EWCS composite index
40   IV,    11.  1.  3|           the health system being assessed, the availability and reliability
41   IV,    12. 10    |         home facilities for those assessed as in need of nursing home
42   IV,    12. 10    |         group that systematically assessed the evidence on the effectiveness