Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1   II,     5.  1.  3|          account in the long-term follow-up. Medical schools are lagging
 2   II,     5.  2.  3|           and then referred for a follow-up admission for CABG. As it
 3   II,     5.  3.  2|         number of interval cases, follow-up of cases after migration
 4   II,     5.  3.  7|          diagnosis, treatment and follow-up, and palliative care. The
 5   II,     5.  3.  8|           demand for resources to follow-up cancer patients and identify
 6   II,     5.  3.  8|           demand for resources to follow-up cancer patients and identify
 7   II,     5.  4.  8| computerized health screening and follow-up system in diabetes mellitus,
 8   II,     5.  5.  2|       Alzheimer’s disease;~· As a follow-up to the Paris declaration,
 9   II,     5.  5.  3|         that several studies were follow-up measurements of 5 or 10
10   II,     5.  5.  3|        cohort study with a 5 year follow-up for Goteborg shows that
11   II,     5.  5.  3|           epilepsy in children: a follow-up study three years after
12   II,     5.  5.  3|          persisted over a 30-year follow-up period, with the highest
13   II,     5.  5.  3|           et al (2006): A 50-year follow-up of the incidence of multiple
14   II,     5.  5.  3|     Sclerosis Registry: a 50-year follow-up. Mult Scler 5:293-296.~Koch-Henriksen
15   II,     5.  7.  2|           and type of RRT. During follow-up of the patients the changes
16   II,     5.  7.  7|           the general population: follow-up of cross sectional health
17   II,     5.  8.  3|        never smokers, in a 9-year follow-up of a general population
18   II,     5.  8.  3|          41% was directed to COPD follow-up, 25% to COPD complications
19   II,     5.  8.  4|          et al, 2006). During the follow-up, subjects with chronic bronchitis
20   II,     5.  8.  7|          and 40-year mortality: a follow-up in middle-aged rural men.
21   II,     5.  9. FB|          system to ensure regular follow-up. An early and accurate diagnosis
22   II,     5.  9.  2|           ECRHS II is a nine year follow-up prospective survey of more
23   II,     5. 10.  2|   allergenic foods in Europe~ ~As follow-up of discussions in Codex
24   II,     5. 11.  3|     Nickel on the Swedish market. Follow-up after implementation of
25   II,     6.  3.  1|         in suggesting methods for follow-up of interventions made. Also
26   II,     9.  1.  2|    Longitudinal and retrospective follow-up studies of children with
27   II,     9.  1.  2|           is needed in systematic follow-up of medicinal drugs and assisted
28   II,     9.  3.  2|          on home care and routine follow-up services.~ ~Figure 9.3.2.
29   II,     9.  5.  6|     Health selection in a 14-year follow-up study - a question of gendered
30  III,    10.  2.  1|          intervention at six year follow-up.~ ~There is extensive evidence
31  III,    10.  2.  1|        for the EU27 as one of the follow-up actions of the European
32  III,    10.  3.  1|        extension of the mortality follow-up of the Newfoundland Fluorspar
33  III,    10.  4.  1|        Air Pollutionanswers to follow-up questions from CAFE, Report
34  III,    10.  4.  2|       Immediate notifications and follow-up reports are published under
35  III,    10.  4.  2| environment (EU 2002). During the follow-up of this incident, Swedish
36  III,    10.  5.  1|      Swedish fourteen-year cohort follow-up . Scandinavian Journal of
37  III,    10.  5.  2|    diagnosed childhood asthma and follow-up of symptoms in a Swedish
38   IV,    12.  2    |          diagnosis, treatment and follow-up, and palliative care. The
39   IV,    12.  2    |          intervention at six year follow-up. There is extensive evidence
40   IV,    12.  5    |   appropriate coordination of and follow-up to Community initiatives
41   IV,    12.  6    |       back to the Forum about the follow-up given to its positions and