Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 I, 3. 4 | Population: An English Selection, Vol. 21, No. 4: 303-316~ ~
2 II, 5. 3. 1| cancers combined and on a selection of major cancer sites: lung
3 II, 5. 4. 2| self-motivation can be very prone to selection bias. Furthermore, only
4 II, 5. 4. 4| also prone to differential selection, as blind patients are harder
5 II, 5. 5. 3| in case ascertainment and selection bias. However, the most
6 II, 5. 7. 3| at least in part, due to selection bias, the survival of RRT
7 II, 5. 8. 4| methods used for patients selection and classification. Despite
8 II, 5. 14. 5| indicators, operating a selection is not an easy task. The
9 II, 5. 15. 3| mutations occur rarely and selection forces prevent their wide
10 II, 6. 3. 2| promote the emergence and selection of resistant bacteria.~ ~
11 II, 6. 4. 1| and the criteria for their selection. The network's main task
12 II, 8. 2. 2| low vision~ ~A review and selection, based on predefined criteria,
13 II, 8. 2. 2| Description~ ~A review and selection, based on predefined criteria,
14 II, 9 | antiepileptic drugs) but a careful selection of the type of drug is needed
15 II, 9. 1. 2| antiepileptic drugs) but a careful selection of the type of drug is needed
16 II, 9. 3. 1| important determinant in patient selection for treatment or intervention
17 II, 9. 5. 6| Janlert U (2005): Health selection in a 14-year follow-up study -
18 III, 10. 1. 1| 2005; Titchenal, 1988).~ ~Selection of macronutrients (carbohydrate,
19 III, 10. 2. 1| surveillance in Europe. A selection of essential indicators
20 III, 10. 2. 1| ranges as well as a wide selection of ready-to-eat meals, including
21 III, 10. 3. 1| of building material and selection of radium free materials
22 III, 10. 4. 1| years lost annually in a selection of European cities (WHO,
23 IV, 11. 1. 6| study in Copenhagen of a selection of GPs changing from a full
24 IV, 11. 5. 3| criteria for cadaver organ selection are regulated by technical
25 IV, 11. 5. 3| only nine having binding selection criteria in place. For the
26 IV, 11. 6. 4| reduces incentives for risk selection (in social health insurance
27 IV, 11. 6. 4| sickness funds engaging in risk selection and to shift the financial
28 IV, 11. 6. 4| implemented to prevent risk selection amongst competing sickness
29 IV, 11. 6. 4| is some evidence of risk selection activities (van de Ven et
30 IV, 11. 6. 4| increased evidence of risk selection therefore undermining some
31 IV, 11. 6. 5| Risk adjustment and risk selection on the sickness fund insurance
32 IV, 13. 2. 3| factors~Environmental~factors~Selection from Public Health Status
33 IV, 13. 7. 5| an approach will, through selection bias, seriously jeopardise
