Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 II, 5. 3. 5| with GDP (Figure 5.3.25) possibly due to the diffusion of
2 II, 5. 3. 6| in survival can often be possibly related to advances in treatment.
3 II, 5. 4. 1| may also induce cataract possibly leading to blindness;~Kidneys:
4 II, 5. 4. 4| also is more biases related possibly due to the use different
5 II, 5. 5. 3| in the more recent years possibly mediated by deinstitutionalization
6 II, 5. 6. 3| functional impairment and possibly a loss of independence if
7 II, 5. 9. FB| dermatitis topically, and possibly with systemic pharmacotherapy,
8 II, 5. 10. 6| increase sensitivity and possibly overcome food matrix issues,
9 II, 5. 14. 1| permanent molars, and might possibly create serious orthodontic
10 II, 6. 3. 3| 2004, but this increase may possibly be a surveillance artefact.
11 II, 6. 3. 5| show a sustained decrease possibly due to the introduction
12 II, 8. 2. 3| hypothyroidism, diabetes, and possibly hyperlipidemia, among others.~ ~
13 II, 9. 1. 2| neural tube defects, and possibly other anomalies also (Botto
14 II, 9. 2. 2| and this appears a sad but possibly realistic expression of
15 III, 10. 1. 1| life of growing children possibly leading to social, psychological
16 III, 10. 2. 1| than that of HCV markers, possibly due to differences in vaccination
17 III, 10. 2. 1| substances identified as having possibly played a role in deaths
18 III, 10. 2. 1| gum health is improving, possibly due to the improved dental
19 III, 10. 2. 1| symptoms of depression and, possibly, stress and anxiety. Moreover,
20 III, 10. 2. 1| mental disturbances and possibly some forms of cancer. Adequate
21 III, 10. 3. 1| category 2B carcinogen (possibly carcinogenic) in 2001, mainly
22 III, 10. 3. 1| exposure limits. Reports on possibly hypersensitive individuals
23 III, 10. 4. 2| pesticides residues~ ~EFSA is possibly involved in the development
24 III, 10. 4. 2| should contain a means( possibly a quantitative one) to compare/
25 III, 10. 4. 5| coastal and inland waters and possibly by climate changes, not
26 III, 10. 4. 5| of adverse health effects possibly associated to well managed
27 III, 10. 4. 5| non Hodgkin’s lymphomas, possibly related to exposure to 2,
28 III, 10. 5. 3| prevalence, early onset and possibly unfavourable long-term course
29 IV, 11. 1. 3| a single estimate could possibly capture the multitude of
30 IV, 11. 3. 1| Greek calculations, and possibly of the exclusion of private
31 IV, 11. 3. 1| to be effective, although possibly more costly (Simoens and
32 IV, 13. 6. 1| loss of parental time, but possibly by a reduced range of family
33 IV, 13. 6. 1| Anxiety, stress, and possibly loss of earning of the parent(
