Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1    I,     2. 10.  3|                   interoperability, trust & confidence, SME take-up and regulatory
 2   II,     5.  1.  3|               achieve awareness, knowledge, confidence and skills which could help
 3   II,     5.  5.  1|                     2. Odds ratio (with 95% confidence interval) for a score of
 4   II,     5.  5.  1|                     3. Odds ratio (with 95% confidence interval) for a score MH<
 5   II,     5.  5.  1|                     4. Odds ratio (with 95% confidence interval) for a score MH<
 6   II,     5.  9.  4| rhino-conjunctivitis symptoms was 0.50 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38-0.65)
 7   II,     5. 10.  3|                    prevalence rates and 95% Confidence Intervals per country in
 8   II,     5. 11.  1|                    unwelcome and to have no confidence in one’s appearance. In
 9   II,     5. 14.  5|                 significantly improve their confidence in managing the oral health
10   II,     5. 15.  3|                    1 000 inhabitants with a confidence interval of 1-9. This estimation
11   II,     9.  2.  3|                deeply flawed. Nevertheless, confidence in immunisation over and
12   II,     9.  5.  3|                     self-esteem and lack of confidence cause anxiety and lack of
13  III,    10.  4.  2|                    crises for both consumer confidence and trade, a number of key
14  III,    10.  4.  2|                    much to restore consumer confidence in the European food supply.
15  III,    10.  4.  2|               restore and maintain consumer confidence in the European food supply,
16  III,    10.  4.  2|                including the:~ ~· crisis in confidence due to the lack of functional
17  III,    10.  4.  2|              necessary to increase consumer confidence in food law. Transparency
18  III,    10.  4.  2|                    in building this greater confidence.~ ~The GFL also establishes
19  III,    10.  4.  2|                 safety and restore consumer confidence.~ ~These measures, based
20  III,    10.  4.  2|                      that threatened public confidence in existing food legislation
21  III,    10.  4.  2|                   that, in order to provide confidence in the outcome of a risk-benefit
22  III,    10.  4.  2|                  Europe and building public confidence in the risks in a open and
23  III,    10.  4.  2|               Europe and in building public confidence in the way risk is assessed.
24  III,    10.  6.  1|                    effects and increase the confidence of residents at night-time (
25  III,    10.  6.  3|                    effects and increase the confidence of residents at night-time.~ ~ ~ ~
26   IV,    11.  1.  5|                 groups, most Europeans have confidence that their doctor, medical
27   IV,    11.  1.  5|                There are varying degrees of confidence amongst the EU25 for doctors
28   IV,    11.  1.  5|                   have the highest level of confidence in both categories (as well
29   IV,    11.  1.  5|                    of respondents expressed confidence in health professionals,
30   IV,    11.  1.  6|             reasonable cost to maintain the confidence of patients. Fee-for-service