Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 II, 5. 2. 6| sector, and monitoring and evaluating progress and outcomes.~ ~
2 II, 5. 3. 2| general population.~ ~· Evaluating the impact of environmental
3 II, 5. 3. 2| living in rich areas; and~ ~· Evaluating the quality of cancer care
4 II, 5. 5. 3| factors underline the need of evaluating detailed mortality data
5 II, 5. 5. 3| commonly used measures in evaluating the burden of MS in health
6 II, 5. 5. 3| disability in MS, aimed at evaluating the efficacy of interventional
7 II, 5. 7. 7| chronic kidney disease -- evaluating risk factors and therapeutic
8 II, 5. 10. 7| development of methodology for evaluating the human allergenic potential
9 II, 5. 10. 7| Privalle L, Vieths S (2007): Evaluating the effect of food processing
10 II, 6. 4. 1| preventive programmes and for evaluating preventive programmes and
11 II, 7. 4. 7| planning, implementing and evaluating violence prevention projects.~ ~
12 II, 9. 1. 1| information is very important for evaluating perinatal health outcomes.
13 II, 9. 1. 1| indicator set for monitoring and evaluating perinatal health in Europe:
14 II, 9. 3. 2| indicator set for monitoring and evaluating perinatal health in Europe:
15 II, 9. 5. 4| alcohol-related harm, implementing and evaluating effective strategies and
16 III, 10. 2. 1| health. It is a tool for evaluating the health effects of all
17 III, 10. 2. 5| project for developing and evaluating early mother and child interaction
18 III, 10. 3. 2| Criteria 237. Principles for evaluating health risks in children
19 III, 10. 4. 2| Regulation, submitted by the Evaluating Member State (EMS in not
20 III, 10. 5. 3| implementation of adopted texts and evaluating the evolving future needs:~-
21 III, 10. 6. 2| these services aimed at evaluating the physical and psychological
22 III, 10. 6. 3| planning, implementing and evaluating violence prevention projects.
23 IV, 11. 1. 3| important to consider when evaluating a country’s health system,
24 IV, 11. 1. 5| The former are directed at evaluating the organization of care
25 IV, 11. 6. 4| emphasis has been placed on evaluating the process and the accessibility
26 IV, 12. 5 | exercises and tests of, evaluating and revising general contingency
27 IV, 12. 10 | Outcome~Study in Ireland - Evaluating Drug Treatment Effectiveness)
28 IV, 12. 10 | methods of monitoring and evaluating health promotion, as well
29 IV, 13. 8 | players in monitoring and evaluating the application of Community
