Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1   II,     5. 10.Acr|      Authority~EU~European Union~FA~Food Allergy~FHS~Food Hypersensitivity~
 2   II,     5. 10.  1|          confirmed food allergy (FA), which has been roughly
 3   II,     5. 10.  1|           Health consequences of FA range from mild symptoms
 4   II,     5. 10.  1|       general, the occurrence of FA is governed by complex interactions
 5   II,     5. 10.  1|         identified foods causing FA shows a geographical variation
 6   II,     5. 10.  1|        geographical variation in FA lies in the level of exposure
 7   II,     5. 10.  1|         The only way of managing FA is avoiding the incriminated
 8   II,     5. 10.  2|        are lacking, however, for FA. At present, available data
 9   II,     5. 10.  2|       present, available data on FA prevalence come from individual
10   II,     5. 10.  2| sensitive individuals among whom FA are more common than in
11   II,     5. 10.  2|         and clinically diagnosed FA may be substantial and age-dependant (
12   II,     5. 10.  2|          diagnostic criteria for FA questionnaires on self-reported
13   II,     5. 10.  2|  questionnaires on self-reported FA (which usually do not differentiate
14   II,     5. 10.  2|        not differentiate between FA and food intolerance) and/
15   II,     5. 10.  2| clinically relevant IgE-mediated FA and to underestimate the
16   II,     5. 10.  2|  underestimate the prevalence of FA non IgE-mediated (Woods
17   II,     5. 10.  2|       prevalence of IgE-mediated FA across Europe in infants,
18   II,     5. 10.  2|       prevalence of IgE-mediated FA to the foods that are responsible
19   II,     5. 10.  2|  responsible for the majority of FA episodes (peanut, milk,
20   II,     5. 10.  2|     method used for diagnosis of FA (Rona et al, 2007). For
21   II,     5. 10.  2|      review of available data on FA prevalence across Europe
22   II,     5. 10.  3|       prevalence of IgE-mediated FA in Europe has been roughly
23   II,     5. 10.  3|       prevalence of IgE-mediated FA to individual food items
24   II,     5. 10.  4|        of the real prevalence of FA and intolerance among specific
25   II,     5. 10.  4|       food and over-diagnosis of FA and intolerance due to inadequate
26   II,     5. 10.  4|      women.~The social burden of FA and intolerance goes far
27   II,     5. 10.  6|       first step in dealing with FA and intolerance in the community
28   IV,    12. 10    |  products~http ~ ~2006 Campaign: FA C T S A N D A D V I C E~