Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1   II,     5.  2.  7|           M, Tuomilehto J (2000): Estimation of contribution of changes
 2   II,     5.  2.  7|        WHO MONICA Project (2000): Estimation of contributions of changes
 3   II,     5.  5.  2|  impossible to obtain an accurate estimation of the number of people
 4   II,     5.  5.  3|         Lauer L, Kobelt G (2007): Estimation of the cost of MS in Europe:
 5   II,     5.  5.  3|           Parkinson’s disease. An estimation based on a 3-month prospective
 6   II,     5.  5.  3|     Porsius AJ, de Boer A (2001): Estimation of incidence and prevalence
 7   II,     5.  6.  3|         OA by agreed criteria. An estimation of the incidence of severe
 8   II,     5.  8.  7|         emphysema: a pan-European estimation. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2007;
 9   II,     5.  8.  7|       pulmonary disease in Spain. Estimation from a population-based
10   II,     5.  9.  3|          et al, 1996) provided an estimation of the proportion of direct
11   II,     5. 10.  4|          discussion~ ~An accurate estimation of the real prevalence of
12   II,     5. 15.  3|  confidence interval of 1-9. This estimation is lower than the prevalence
13   II,     8.  2.  2|        from visual impairment. An estimation of the visual impairment
14   II,     8.  2.  2|        from visual impairment. An estimation of the visual impairment
15   II,     8.  2.  3|        not been considered in the estimation of the burden of disability
16  III,    10.  2.  1|         of Member States. A crude estimation made by EMCDDA in 2004,
17  III,    10.  2.  1|            For countries where an estimation of the coverage of substitution
18  III,    10.  2.  1|         method to be used for the estimation of intake of foods, nutrients
19  III,    10.  3.  1|         every year. Most probable estimation is 800 extra cases. In Sweden (
20  III,    10.  3.  1|        Dose-effect Curve and Risk Estimation. Umweltbundesambt. WaBoLu
21  III,    10.  4.  2|          substances40. As a rough estimation about 7.5 millions of individual
22  III,    10.  4.  2|        water scenarios; the FOCUS estimation of persistence and degradation
23  III,    10.  4.  5|        based on hazard detection, estimation of the size of the exposed
24   IV,    11.  6.  3| unreliable, along with the use of estimation rather than explicit calculation
25   IV,    13.  2    |      Assessing priorities through estimation of the burden of disease~ ~